Q.-Q. Huang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 5386–5391
5391
(MIC ranged between 32 and >128 lg/ml, data not
References and notes
shown) in comparison with Gatifloxacin. Compound 7
was the better one against Gram-negative bacteria,
while compound 1 was slightly better against Gram-
positive bacteria, but there was no significance difference
(P > 0. 05) among these compounds.
1. Bradshaw, R. A.; Brickey, W. W.; Walker, K. W. Trends
Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23, 263.
2. Chen, S.; Vetro, J. A.; Chang, Y. H. Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 2002, 398, 87.
3. Griffith, E. C.; Su, Z.; Niwayama, S.; Ramsay, C. A.;
Chang, Y. H.; Liu, J. O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
1998, 95, 15183.
Chemical modifications of the Mn(II)-form-selective
lead compounds 1–3 and subsequent biological evalua-
tion of these compounds on Co(II)-, Mn(II)-, Ni(II)-
and Fe(II)-forms of EcMetAP have provided valuable
information on the structural elements responsible for
their potency and metalloform selectivity. A small
hydrophobic substitution at the 2-position of the phenyl
ring is required for inhibitory activity, consistent with
the non-coplanar conformation of the two aromatic
rings of inhibitor 1 found at the enzyme active site.
However, although various substitutions on the phenyl
ring changed their potency, there was no change in their
metalloform selectivity. It is likely that the superb metal-
loform selectivity displayed by inhibitors such as 1 is
achieved primarily by coordination of the carboxyl
group to the metal ions. Changing the carboxyl to
hydroxamate alters the ability to bind and discriminate
different metal ions, and the hydroxamate derivative 7,
although it is still potent, becomes non-selective among
the metalloforms tested. Although no significant anti-
bacterial activity was observed, the present compounds
are MetAP inhibitors with unique metalloform selectiv-
ity. At this time when the physiologically relevant metal-
loform remains to be defined, these metalloform-
selective inhibitors, as well as the non-selective inhibi-
tors, will be valuable tools for current research and po-
tential leads for future drug development.
4. Griffith, E. C.; Su, Z.; Turk, B. E.; Chen, S.; Chang, Y. H.;
Wu, Z.; Biemann, K.; Liu, J. O. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 461.
5. Towbin, H.; Bair, K. W.; DeCaprio, J. A.; Eck, M. J.;
Kim, S.; Kinder, F. R.; Morollo, A.; Mueller, D. R.;
Schindler, P.; Song, H. K.; van Oostrum, J.; Versace, R.
W.; Voshol, H.; Wood, J.; Zabludoff, S.; Phillips, P. E.
J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 52964.
6. Chang, S. Y.; McGary, E. C.; Chang, S. J. Bacteriol. 1989,
171, 4071.
7. Miller, C. G.; Kukral, A. M.; Miller, J. L.; Movva, N. R.
J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 5215.
8. Vaughan, M. D.; Sampson, P. B.; Honek, J. F. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2002, 9, 385.
9. Lowther, W. T.; Matthews, B. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
2000, 1477, 157.
10. Li, J. Y.; Chen, L. L.; Cui, Y. M.; Luo, Q. L.; Li, J.; Nan,
F. J.; Ye, Q. Z. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003,
307, 172.
11. Walker, K. W.; Bradshaw, R. A. Y. Protein Sci. 1998, 7,
2684.
12. DÕSouza, V. M.; Holz, R. C. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 11079.
13. DÕSouza, V. M.; Bennett, B.; Copik, A. J.; Holz, R. C.
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 3817.
14. DÕSouza, V. M.; Swierczek, S. I.; Cosper, N. J.; Meng, L.;
Ruebush, S.; Copik, A. J.; Scott, R. A.; Holz, R. C.
Biochemistry 2002, 41, 13096.
15. Cottrell, G. S.; Hooper, N. M.; Turner, A. J. Biochemistry
2000, 39, 15121.
16. Wang, J.; Sheppard, G. S.; Lou, P.; Kawai, M.; Park, C.;
Egan, D. A.; Schneider, A.; Bouska, J.; Lesniewski, R.;
Henkin, J. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 5035.
17. Garrabrant, T.; Tuman, R. W.; Ludovici, D.; Tomino-
vich, R.; Simoneaux, R. L.; Galemmo, R. A., Jr.; Johnson,
D. L. Angiogenesis 2004, 7, 91.
18. Ye, Q. Z.; Xie, S. X.; Huang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Lu, J. P.;
Ma, Z. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13940.
19. Kaltenbronn, J. S.; Rhee, T. O. J. Med. Chem. 1968, 11,
902.
20. Yang, G.; Kirkpatrick, R. B.; Ho, T.; Zhang, G. F.; Liang,
P. H.; Johanson, K. O.; Casper, D. J.; Doyle, M. L.;
Marino, J. P., Jr.; Thompson, S. K.; Chen, W.; Tew, D.
G.; Meek, T. D. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 10645.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China Grants 30271528 (F.-J.N.)
and 39725032 (Q.-Z.Y.), the Qi Ming Xing Foundation
of Shanghai Ministry of Science and Technology Grant
02QB14013 (F.-J.N.), the 863 Hi-Tech Program Grant
2001AA234011 (F.-J.N.), and the NIH Grants R01
AI065898, P20 RR15563 from the COBRE program
and P20 RR16475 from the INBRE program of the
National Center for Research Resources (Q.-Z.Y.).