C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Mixtures of disk fractions 0.54 e φ2 e 0.60 show a second
transition in the DSC traces between the glass transition and the
clearing temperature; see II and III in Figure 2d. The small transition
is not associated with a change of the optical texture, even after
prolonged annealing. Preliminary X-ray studies show only diffuse
halos in the wide and the small angle region, indicating the absence
of any positional order and, hence, excluding the assignment to
smectic or columnar phase structures.13
As no demixing could be observed experimentally, the assign-
ment of the extra NX phase to a NB phase correlates the achieve-
ments of theory and the experiment best. Demixing would have
pointed toward a phase separation process into two uniaxial phases,
predicted by theoretical models8,15 to occur at temperatures below
the NB phase or instead of the NB phase.
In conclusion, these results indicate that it is possible to
synthesize molecules which are completely miscible in the nematic
phase with rod-shaped and disk-shaped molecules. To the best of
our knowledge, we presented the first experimentally obtained phase
diagram of thermotropic discotic and calamitic mesogens. The
construction of such a phase diagram is a major step forward in
the design and development of future materials exhibiting a nematic
biaxial phase. As theory for the NB phase predicts, the mixtures
exhibit a minimum in the transition enthalpies when approaching
the minimum nematic to isotropic transition. Furthermore, a
subsequent nematic-nematic transition can be observed, in line
with theoretical predictions, thus requiring further investigations
(e.g., solid state NMR on systematically deuterated samples) to
confirm phase biaxiallity.
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. D. Photinos, Patras, Greece
for helpful discussions, and the Ramsay Memorial Fund and the
EU (contract HPRN-CT2000-00016) for financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
phase diagrams, OPM and XRD data of mixtures (PDF). This material
References
(1) Freiser, M. J. Phys ReV. Lett. 1970, 24, 1041.
(2) (a) Straley, J. P. Phys ReV. A 1973, 10, 1881. (b) De Gennes, P. G.; Prost,
J. The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1993.
(3) (a) Yu, L. J.; Saupe, A. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1980, 45, 1000. (b) De Melo
Filho, A. A.; Laverde, A.; Fujiwara, F. Y. Langmuir 2003, 19, 1127.
(4) Leube, H. F.; Finkelmann, H. Makromol. Chem. 1991, 192, 1317.
(5) (a) Luckhurst, G. R. Thin Solid Films 2001, 393, 40 and references therein.
(b) Praefcke, K. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2001, 364, 15 and references
therein.
(6) Shih, C. S.; Alben, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 55, 3055. (b) Alben, R. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 1973, 30, 7781; Phys. ReV. Lett. 1973, 30, 778.
(7) Stroobants, A.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 3669.
(8) (a) Vanakaras, A. G.; Photinos, D. J. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1997, 299,
65. (b) Vanakaras, A. G.; McGrother, S. C.; Jackson, G.; Photinos, D. J.
Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1998, 323, 199. (c) Vanakaras, A. G.; Terzis, A.
F.; Photinos, D. J. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2001, 367, 67.
(9) Palffy-Muhoray, P.; De Bruyn, J. R.; Dunmur, D. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1985,
82, 1985.
(10) (a) Hunt, J. J.; Date, R. W.; Timini, B. A.; Luckhurst, G. R.; Bruce, D.
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10115. (b) Fletcher, I. D.; Luckhurst,
G. R. Liq. Cryst. 1995, 18, 175. (c) Date, R. W.; Bruce, D. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc., in press.
(11) Kouwer, P. H. J.; Mehl, G. H. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2003, 397, 301.
(12) Kouwer, P. H. J.; Jager, W. F.; Mijs, W. J.; Picken, S. J. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 4322.
(13) Further details are provided in the Supporting Information.
(14) It is noted that the contact sample of 2 and 3 showed a large isotropic
interface, also at low temperatures.
Figure 2. (a) Phase diagrams of 1 and 3. (b) Phase diagrams of 1 and 2.
Experimental data (symbols) are obtained from DSC studies, apart from
the mixtures showing the Nu+I biphasic area (data from OPM). The lines
are a guide to the eye. DSC traces of mixtures I-IV are shown in diagram
d. (c) Latent heat values for the Nu-I and NX-Nu transitions of 1:2 mixtures.
The dotted line represents the maximum resolution of the DSC for
integrating phase transitions unambiguously. The inset shows a magnifica-
tion from the data in the box. (d) Normalized DSC traces of mixtures 1:2
(at the NX phase region) in ratios: (I) 0.50:0.50; (II) 0.46:0.54; (III) 0.43:
0.57; and (IV) 0.37:0.63. The arrows indicate the maxima of the phase
transitions.
estimated to be the maximum resolution for reliable quantitative
evaluation of the instrument used. Further increasing the fraction
of 2 results in a small increase in the latent heat. Smearing out the
small transitions in the bistable N+I area hampered quantitative
evaluation of the isotropization enthalpy in that region, approaching
the limit of the sensitivity of the instrumentation used.
(15) (a) Wensink, H. H.; Vroege, G. J.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Phys. ReV. E
2002, 66, 41704. (b) Van Roy, R.; Mulder, B. J. Phys. II 1994, 2, 1763.
JA037075Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 37, 2003 11173