substantial flexibility for further transformations. Finally, the
operational convenience of these reactions is noteworthy as
they are carried out at ambient temperature, in water, and
open to air.
Table 1. Initial Catalyst Screening
Scheme 2. Catalyst Formation
entrya
R
R1, R2
conversion %b
ee %c
1
2
3
4
5
6
p-Tol
F5C6
F5C6
p-Tol
CF3
-(CH2)4-
Cy
-(CH2)4-
Ph
Ph
Ph
46
0
<5
81
>90
>90
15
ND
ND
84
90
94
F5C6
a Reactions were carried out with 0.5 mmol of ketone. b Determined by
1H NMR of crude reaction after workup. c Enantiomeric excess was
determined by chiral HPLC.
Recent studies by Ogo, Fukuzumi, and colleagues have
yielded water-soluble pH-dependent catalysts that perform
achiral reductions in aqueous medium.4 We were intrigued
at the prospect of utilizing chiral aqua complexes derived
from iridium(III) trihydrate precatalysts4a for the catalytic,
enantioselective reduction of ketones (Scheme 2). Asym-
metric reductions with such catalysts would be beneficial
on several fronts, including both cost of reductant (HCO2H)
and solvent (H2O), as well as ease of operation. The advantage
with regard to safety of formic acid as compared to molecular
hydrogen is also apparent when considering conducting large-
scale reactions. The benefits of working with water as a reaction
medium is also noteworthy, and processes utilizing water as a
reaction medium are on the rise.5
leads for further optimization (Table 1, entry 4). A screen
of sulfonamides with a broad range of steric and electronic
properties proved fruitful. Ligands bearing strong electron-
deficient sulfonamides yielded catalysts with improved
selectivity and reactivity. Perfluorinated sulfonamides in
particular displayed remarkable reactivity, which is in
contrast to what has been observed with Ru(II) based
catalysts (Table 1, entries 5 and 6).2b
Examination of the scope of R-cyano ketones indicated a
well-tolerated reaction at pH ) 3.5 (Table 2). In many cases
catalyst loadings as low as 0.25 mol % proved sufficient for
Initial catalyst screening and optimization relied upon
preparation of chiral iridium(III) complexes such as 3
(Scheme 2). These catalysts are prepared by combining
the known Ir(III) trihydrate complex 1 with a ligand of
choice in a water/methanol solution at ambient tempera-
ture. Removal of the solvent yielded aqua complexes as
air-stable solids in quantitative yields. After screening a
broad selection of bidentate ligands for the reduction of
a standard R-cyano ketone 3-oxo-3-phenylpropanenitrile
4, it was clear that monosulfonylated 1,2-diphenyl di-
amines,6 such as Noyori’s Ts-DPEN ligand, served as
Table 2. Scope of R-Substituted Ketones
entrya b
Ar
X
mol % cat. yield %c ee %d
,
1
2
3
4
C6H5
m-Cl-C6H4
m-CH3O-C6H4 CN
p-F-C6H4
p-CH3-C6H4
2-naphthyl
2-furyl
2-thiophenyl
p-CN-C6H4
C6H5
p-tBu-C6H4
m-Br-C6H4
m-Cl-C6H4
2-naphthyl
o-CH3O-C6H4
C6H5
CN
CN
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.5
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.25
96
90
96
95
96
95
83
94
97
94
92
54
95
53
93
93
94
90
95
91
93
96
96
92
86
93
99
91
95
93
83
91
(4) (a) Ogo, S.; Makihara, N.; Watanabe, Y. Organometallics 1999, 18,
5470. (b) Ogo, S.; Makihara, N.; Kaneko, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Organometallics
2001, 20, 4903. (c) Abura, T.; Ogo, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4149. (d) Ogo, S.; Uehara, K.; Abura, T.; Fukuzumi,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3020.
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
5
6e
7
(5) For discussions of water as a reaction medium, see: (a) Lindstro¨m,
U. M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 2751. (b) Li, C. J. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105,
3095. For examples of ATH in water, see: . (c) Soltani, O.; Ariger, M. A.;
Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4196. (d) Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Zanotti-
Gerosa, A.; Hancock, F.; Vinci, D.; Ruan, J.; Xiao, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 6718. (e) Li, X.; Blacker, J.; Houson, I.; Wu, X.; Xiao, J.
Synlett 2006, 8, 1155. (f) Wu, X.; Li, X; King, F.; Xiao, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3407. (g) Wu, X.; Li, X.; Hems, W.; King, F.; Xiao, J.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1818. (h) Wu, J.; Wang, F.; Ma, Y.; Cui, X.;
Cun, L.; Zhu, J.; Deng, J.; Yu, B. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1766.
(6) (a) Pederson, S. F.; Roskamp, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
3152. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Su, X.; Nishigaichi, Y.; Coe, D. M.; Wong, K.
-T.; Winter, S. B. D.; Choi, J. Y. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1958. (c) Busacca,
C. A.; Grossbach, D.; Campbell, S. C.; Dong, Y.; Eriksson, M. C.; Harris,
R. E.; Jones, P. J.; Kim, J. Y.; Lorenz, J. C.; McKellop, K. B.; O’Brien,
E. M.; Qiu, F.; Simpson, R. D.; Smith, L.; So, R. C.; Spinelli, E. M.; Vitous,
J.; Zavattaro, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5187. (d) Kim, H.; Nguyen, Y.;
Yen, C. P-H.; Chagal, L.; Lough, A. J.; Kim, B. M.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 12184.
8
9
CN
10
11
12
13
14e
15
16
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
Cl
a Reactions were carried out with 0.5 mmol of ketone. b For X ) CN,
Cl, pH ) 3.5; for X ) NO2, pH ) 2.0. c Isolated yield, d Enantiomeric
excess was determined by chiral HPLC. e Addition of 10 mol %
hexafluoroisopropanol.
2894
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 13, 2010