1
In a newly developed reaction, we could achieve 1,1-re-
ductive elimination of the Pt(dppp) “corners” from bismetalla-
cycle 3 under simultaneous C–C bond formation and preserva-
tion of the cyclic structure by treatment of 3 with 2 eq. of iodine.
100% conversion of the starting material took place at an
optimum temperature of 60 °C and a reaction time of 24 hours
in THF. After chromatographic separation from polymeric by-
products and Pt(dppp)I2 the cyclodimeric terthiophene-diyne 4
was isolated in 54% yield as a stable red microcrystalline solid
(Scheme 1). It represents the smallest (26-memb.) macrocycle
in the homologous series which, however, could never be
detected in the previous random cyclooligomerization reac-
tions. Due to the highly symmetrical structure, 1H and 13C NMR
spectra consist of only few signals which are directly compara-
ble to those of the corresponding higher members in the series.
The cyclic structure of 4 is finally, unambiguously proven by a
molecular mass of m/z = 1036.7 in the MALDI-TOF mass
spectra.
conjugated cyclo[n]thiophenes came from H and 13C NMR
spectra, which are very simple due to the high symmetry of the
molecule, and MALDI-TOF mass spectra exhibiting molecular
ions at m/z = 1104.5. Very recently, the synthesis and structural
characterization of a comparable cyclo[8]pyrrole have been
reported.15
In summary, we have developed a very effective method for
the synthesis of conjugated macrocycles involving supramo-
lecular formation of platino-macrocycles and subsequent C–C
bond formation through elimination of the transition metal units
by means of an oxidant. In the meanwhile, we successfully used
this protocol for the synthesis of other macrocyclic systems,
indicating a more general applicability of the method.
We are grateful to the German Research Foundation (SFB
569) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for their financial
support of this work, Dr. E. Mena-Osteritz and Dr. P. Kilickiran
(Dept OCII, Ulm) for valuable discussions and Dr. M.
Wunderlin (Division of Mass Spectrometry, Ulm) for various
MALDI-TOF mass spectra.
A more detailed characterization of 4 was possible by X-ray
structure analysis of single crystals which could be obtained by
slow evaporation from chloroform solutions.12 The top view of
an individual molecule (including atomic labelling) shows a
nearly perfect circular shape comprising all-syn-oriented ter-
thiophene moieties which are connected by concavely bowed
butadiyne units indicating considerable ring strain (Fig. 1). The
bond angles of the butadiyne fragments (C1A–C19–C17 163.2°,
C19–C17–C15 167.7°, C17–C15–C13 167.4° and C15–C13–
C11 160.3°) are severely distorted and largely deviate from the
normal linear geometry. They are under the smallest values
reported for strained dehydroannulenes13 or cyclophanes.14 The
alternating carbon–carbon bond lengths are quite typical for
strained macrocycles (C1A–C19 1.416 Å, C19–C17 1.205 Å,
C17–C15 1.368 Å, C15–C13 1.203 Å, C13–C11 1.417 Å). Due
to the steric interactions of the butyl side chains adjacent
thiophene rings are distorted by 13.80° (T1, T2) and 229.09°
(T2, T3), a phenomenon which was also detected in the X-ray
structure analyses of the less strained next larger members in the
homologous series, the cyclotrimeric5b and cyclotetrameric
terthiophene diynes.4a The nonbonding distances S1…S1A and
S1A…S3 are 11.04 Å (largest) and 8.06 Å (smallest), re-
spectively. The space filling model of the 26-membered ring
suggests an interior cavity of about 35 Å2. Despite the distortion
of the thiophene rings and the butadiyne units, the 32p-electron
perimeter shows remarkable conjugation. In the 1H-NMR
spectrum a substantial up-field shift of the thiophene b-protons
in comparison to those of the next larger members in the series
(Dd = 40.2 ppm) shows antiaromatic behaviour.
Notes and references
crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
1 (a) C. Grave and A. D. Schlüter, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 3075–3098;
(b) S. Höger, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 1999, 37,
2685–2698.
2 J. R. Nitschke and T. D. Tilley, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40,
2142–2145.
3 (a) B. J. Holliday and C. Mirkin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40,
2076–2098 and ref. cited therein. S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk and P. J.
Stang, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 853–908 and ref. cited therein (b) M.
Fujita, J. Yazaki and K. Ogura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
5645–5647.
4 (a) J. Krömer, I. Rios-Carreras, G. Fuhrmann, C. Musch, M. Wunderlin,
T. Debaerdemaeker, E. Mena-Osteritz and P. Bäuerle, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3481–3486; (b) G. Fuhrmann, J. Krömer and P.
Bäuerle, Synth. Met., 2001, 119, 125–126.
5 (a) E. Mena-Osteritz, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 609–616; (b) E. Mena-
Osteritz and P. Bäuerle, Adv. Mater., 2001, 13, 243–246.
6 (a) H. Jiang, A. Hu and W. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2003, 96–97; (b) S.
J. Lee, A. Hu and W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 12948–12949;
(c) F. Diederich, Chem. Commun., 2001, 219–227; (d) P. Siemsen, U.
Gubler, C. Bosshard, P. Günter and F. Diederich, Chem. Eur. J., 2001,
7, 1333–1341; (e) E. Bosch and C. L. Barnes, Organometallics, 2000,
19, 5522–5524; (f) W. J. Youngs, C. A. Tessier and J. D. Bradshaw,
Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 3153–3180; (g) S. M. AlQaisi, K. J. Galat, M.
Chai, D. G. Ray III, P. L. Rinaldi, C. A. Tessier and W. J. Youngs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 12149–12150; (h) R. Faust, F. Diederich, V.
Gramlich and P. Seiler, Chem. Eur. J., 1995, 1, 111–117.
7 K. Sonogashira, Y. Tohda and N. Hagihara, Tetrahedron Lett., 1975, 16,
4467–4470.
8 (a) R. Rossi, A. Carpita and C. Bigelli, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26,
523–526; (b) Q. Liu and D. J. Burton, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38,
4371–4374.
9 (a) J. M. Brown and N. A. Cooley, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 1031–1046;
(b) E. Negishi, T. Takahashi and K. Akiyoshi, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1987, 334, 181–194; (c) J. J. Low and W. A. Goddard, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1986, 108, 6115–6116.
Cyclodimeric terthiophene-diyne 4 was finally reacted with
disodium sulfide in xylene/2-methoxyethanol at 140 °C to give
octabutyl-cyclo[8]thiophene 5 which after chromatography was
isolated in 19% yield as a stable red microcrystalline solid. The
modest yield in this reaction might be due to the ring strain in 4
and the high reaction temperature which cause partial destruc-
tion of the cycle. Structural proof of this smallest member of
10 (a) G. Brent Young and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978,
100, 5808–5815; (b) P. S. Braterman, R. J. Cross and G. Brent Young,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1976, 1310–1314.
11 M. Sato and E. Mogi, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3157–3159.
12 X-Ray single-crystal diffraction data for 4 were collected on a STOE-
IPDS image-plate diffractometer. Crystal data: C64H76S6, M = 1037.6,
monoclinic, space group P21/a, a = 9.073(1), b = 20.222(2), c =
16.503(2) Å, b = 104.87(2)°, V = 2926.6(6) Å3, Z = 2, rcalcd = 1.177
g cm23, m(MoKa) = 0.272. Least square refinement based on 3949
reflections with I42s(I) and 468 parameters led to convergence, with a
final R1 = 0.0331, wR2 = 0.0755, and GOF = 0.945. ‡.
13 Modern Acetylene Chemistry, P. J. Stang, F. Diederich (eds.), Verlag
Chemie, Weinheim, 1995.
14 S. K. Collins, G. P. A. Yan and A. G. Fallis, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 11–14
(and references cited therein).
15 D. Seidel, V. Lynch and J. L. Sessler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
1480–1483.
Fig. 1 POVRAY top view of cyclodimeric terthiophenediyne 4.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 948–949
949