2970
P. Furet et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 2967–2971
6. Boyer, S. J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 973.
7. Adams, J.; Huang, P.; Patrick, D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2002, 6, 486.
8. Bold, G.; Altmann, K.-H.; Frei, J.; Lang, M.; Manley,
P. W.; Traxler, P.; Wietfeld, B.; Brueggen, J.; Buchdunger, E.;
Cozens, R.; Ferrari, S.; Furet, P.; Hofmann, F.; Martiny-
Baron, G.; Mestan, J.; Roesel, J.; Sills, M.; Stover, D.; Ace-
moglu, F.; Boss, E.; Emmenegger, R.; Laesser, L.; Masso, E.;
Roth, R.; Schlachter, C.; Vetterli, W.; Wyss, D.; Wood, J. M.
J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2310.
9. Bold, G.; Frei, J.; Furet, P.; Manley, P. W.; Bruggen, J;
Cozens, R.; Ferrari, S.; Hofmann, F.; Martiny-Baron, G.;
Mestan, J.; Meyer, T.; Wood, J. M. Drugs Future 2002, 27, 43.
10. Manley, P. W.; Furet, P.; Bold, G.; Bruggen, J.; Mestan,
J.; Meyer, T.; Schnell, C. R.; Wood, J.; Haberey, M.; Huth,
A.; Kruger, M.; Menrad, A.; Ottow, E.; Seidelmann, D.; Sie-
meister, G.; Thierauch, K.-H. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5687.
11. The conformational analysis of 1 was performed in Mac-
romodel30 using the Monte-Carlo/energy minimization
method (automatic set up-standard protocol) and the
AMBER* force field in conjunction with the GB/SA water
solvation model. The ab initio calculations (restricted Har-
tree–Fock) were performed in Gaussian 92 using the 3-21G
basis set and full geometry optimization.
12. Toledo, L. M.; Lydon, N. B.; Elbaum, D. Curr. Med.
Chem. 1999, 6, 775.
13. Traxler, P.; Furet, P. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82, 195.
14. Furet, P.; Meyer, T.; Strauss, A.; Raccuglia, S.; Rondeau,
J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 221.
15. Zhu, X.; Kim, J. L.; Newcomb, J. R.; Rose, P. E.; Stover,
D. R.; Toledo, L. M.; Zhao, H.; Morgenstern, K. A. Structure
1999, 7, 651.
16. Mohammadi, M.; Froum, S.; Hamby, J. M.; Schroeder,
M. C.; Panek, R. L.; Lu, G. H.; Eliseenkova, A. V.; Green, D.;
Schlessinger, J.; Hubbard, S. R. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 5896.
17. Bostrom, J.; Norrby, P.-O.; Liljefors, T. J. Comput.-Aided
Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 383.
18. A search of the Cambridge crystallographic database
using the anthralinic acid amide moiety shown in Figure 3 as
substructure query returned 14 X-ray crystal structures of
small organic molecules presenting this motif. In all of them,
an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the amine and keto
functionalities was present. Representative structures of this
type have the following entry codes in the database: YEG-
WUC, YEGWOW, TIDNAV and MAMBIL. Ab initio cal-
culations using the 3–21 G basis set indicate that the global
conformational minimum of the molecular fragment shown on
the right hand side of Figure 2 is the conformer presenting the
intramolecular hydrogen bond. The next conformational
minimum is less stable by around 5 kcal/mol.
19. In Figure 2, the molecular electrostatic potential displayed
as isovalue contour lines on the van der Waals surface31 was
calculated using the Coulomb formula with atomic point
charges. These were obtained in MOPAC (version 6.0)32 by
fitting the molecular electrostatic potential calculated from a
wavefunction in the MNDO approximation.
20. Enzyme Inhibition Assays. For the tyrosine kinases, inhi-
bition assays were performed as filter binding assays using
recombinant GST-fused kinase domains of the receptors
expressed in baculovirus and purified over glutathione
sepharose. [33P]-ATP was used as the phosphate donor and the
polyGluTyr (4:1) peptide was used as the acceptor (for details
see ref 8). The CDK1 and PKA assays are described in refs 28
and 29, respectively. Assays were performed under conditions
optimized for each kinase and with ATP concentrations simi-
lar to the Km of the respective enzyme towards ATP: 8.0 mM
(KDR, Flt-1), 1.0 mM (c-Kit, c-Met), 2.0 mM (EGF-R), 20 mM
(c-Src), 30 mM (IGF-1R), 7.5 mM (CDK1) and 50 mM (PKA).
21. A comparison of he KDR inhibitory activity of the first
two compounds reported in Table 3 of ref 8 shows the bene-
ficial effect of this chlorine atom.
22. 3 like 1 is a potent inhibitor for KDR, Flt-1 and kinases of
the PDGF-R family like c-Kit. It is inactive on kinases of the
AGC family (PKA), cyclin-dependent kinase family (CDK1)
and other tyrosine kinase families like ErbB (EGFR) and
c-Src.
23. The following abbreviations are used in the descriptions of
experimental chemistry procedures: AcOEt, ethyl acetate;
AcOH, acetic acid; BOC2O, di-tert-butyl-dicarbonate; DIPE,
di-iso-propylether; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide; FC, flash
chromatography; HBTU, (O-benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N0,N0-
tetramethyluronium-hexafluorophosphate; MeOH, methanol;
Mp, melting point; NMM, N-methyl morpholine; i-PrOH, iso-
propanol; rt, room temperature. All starting materials were
purchased from commercial suppliers and used without fur-
ther purification. Solvents were of reagent grade purity and
used as purchased without any additional distillation. FC was
performed on Merck silica gel 60 (0.043–0.060 mm). NMR
spectra were recorded on a 200-MHz Varian Gemini-200
instrument. Electrospray mass spectra were obtained with a
Fisons Instruments VG Platform II. Melting points were
recorded on a Buchi model 535 melting point apparatus and
are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were performed at Solvias
AG, Basel, Switzerland.
24. Synthesis of 4, 2-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino-benzoic acid.
To a solution of 40 g (0.292 mol) of anthranilic acid in 1 L of
DMF were added 86.6 g (0.397 mol) of BOC2O and the reac-
tion mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The
solvent was then evaporated, the residue re-dissolved in
CH2Cl2 and the solution extracted with 10% citric acid and
saline. The combined aqueous extracts were twice re-extracted
with CH2Cl2, the organic extracts combined, dried over
Na2SO4, and the solvent evaporated. The resulting yellow oil
was re-dissolved in CH2Cl2 and the product precipitated with
DIPE. Reprecipitation from CH2Cl2/DIPE gave 33.6
g
(48.5%) of the title compound as white crystals. From the
mother liquor two additional crops of 3.2 g (white crystals)
and 3.9 g (light yellow crystals), respectively, were 155–156 ꢁC.
C, H, N (237.26): C 60.71%, H 6.42%, N 5.88%, O 26.72%
1
(calcd C 60.75%, H 6.37%, N 5.90%, O 26.97%). H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3) d 10.0 (s, 1H); 8.45 (d, 1H); 8.11 (dd, 1H);
7.53 (dt, 1H); 7.04 (dt, 1H); 1.55 (s, 9H).
25. Synthesis of 5, [2-(4-chloro-phenylcarbamoyl)-phenyl]-
carbamic acid-tert-butyl ester. To a solution of 33.6 g of 4
(0.142 mol) and 36.2 g (0.283 mol) of p-chloro aniline in 660
mL of DMF were added 39.2 mL (0.355 mol) of NMM and
64.3 g (0.170 mol) of HBTU and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was then
evaporated, the residue re-dissolved in CH2Cl2 and the solu-
tion extracted with 10% citric acid, satd aq NaHCO3, and
saline. The aqueous extracts were re-extracted with CH2Cl2,
the organic extracts combined, dried over Na2SO4, and the
solvent evaporated. Treatment of the resulting orange-colored
oil with CH2Cl2 resulted in formation of an orange-colored
precipitate, which was discarded. Evaporation of the filtrate,
dissolution of the residue in CH2Cl2 and precipitation with
ꢁ
DIPE gave 16.9 g (35%) of 5 as white crystals. Mp ꢂ215 C
(dec.). C, H, N (337.81): C 62.23%, H 5.55%, N 8.13%, Cl
10.12%, O 14.23% (calcd C 62.34%, H 5.52%, N 8.08%, Cl,
1
10.22%, O 13.84%). H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 10.5
(s, 1H); 9.85 (s, 1H); 8.08 (d, 1H); 7.77 (dt, 1H); 7.75 (d, 2H);
7.52 (dt, 1H); 7.42 (d, 2H); 7.1 (t, 1H); 1.45 (s, 9H). EI–MS:
247 (100% [MꢀBOC]).
26. Synthesis of 6, 2-amino-N-(4-chloro-phenyl)-benzamide-
hydrochloride. To a suspension of 16.5 g (47.6 mmol) of 5 in
660 mL of MeOH were added 40 mL of 4 N HCl/dioxane (N2-
atmosphere). After 30 min a clear yellow solution had formed
and after 3.5 h the mixture was concentrated to ca. 50% of its