204
A.J. Martínez-Martínez et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 382 (2012) 203–206
Cl
Details of the crystal data and structure refinement of the complex
are listed in Table 1.
PdCl2 + PPh3 + XyNC
Cl Pd CNXy
PPh3
1
3. Results and discussion
Scheme 1. Synthesis of complex 1 from PdCl2, PPh3 and XyNC.
3.1. Synthetic aspects and general properties
2.3. Synthesis of cis-[PdCl2(CNXy)(PPh3)] (1) and VT 1H and 31P NMR
study of the equilibrium. 2ꢁcis-[PdCl2(CNXy)(PPh3)] ¡ cis-
[PdCl2(CNXy)2] + trans-[PdCl2(PPh3)2]
The method here described for the synthesis of complex 1, from
equimolar amounts of PdCl2, XyNC and PPh3 (Scheme 1) is more
straightforward and atom-efficient than any of those previously
described for complexes of this type, some of them being rather
cumbersome. In fact, with respect to the more efficient ones,
[PdCl2(CNR)2] + phosphine or [PdCl2(phosphine)2] + RNC, our
method not only avoids one step but also saves one equivalent of
isocyanide or phosphine, respectively.
To a suspension of PdCl2 (162.5 mg, 1.39 mmol) in acetone
(20 mL) were successively added XyNC (182 mg, 1.39 mmol) and
PPh3 (364 mg, 1.39 mmol). After 1 h of stirring, the resulting green-
ish-yellow suspension was filtered. The solid collected was dis-
solved in CHCl3 (10 mL), filtered through a short pad of Celite,
concentrated under vacuum (5 mL), and Et2O (25 mL) was added.
The suspension was filtered and the solid collected was dried, first
by suction and then in an oven at 70 °C for 7 h, to give cis-
[PdCl2(PPh3)(CNXy)] (1) as a pale yellow solid. Yield: 542 mg,
When we did the reaction in acetone, 1 precipitated from the
reaction mixture and was isolated in 70% yield after recrystalliza-
tion from CHCl3/Et2O, which was necessary in order to separate a
small amount of PdCl2. In spite of the fact that the variable
temperature NMR study described below proves that an equilib-
rium exists in CDCl3 solution between the mixed ligand complex
1, cis-[PdCl2(CNXy)2] (2) and trans-[PdCl2(PPh3)2] (3), the proce-
dure described in Section 2 leads to the precipitation of pure 1,
as shown by the coincidence of its melting point and IR spectrum
with those previously reported [18], and also with those obtained
from a crop of single crystals that we dried in an oven at 70 °C for
0.95 mmol, 70%. Mp: 232 °C (dec). IR (Nujol, cmꢀ1):
m(C„N) 2206
(strong),
m
(Pd–Cl) 347 (medium), 298 (strong). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d 1.95 (s, 6H, Me), 6.98 (d, 2H,
3
3JHH = 7.6 Hz, meta-Xy), 7.18 (t, 1H, JHH = 7.6 Hz, para-Xy), 7.35–
7.50 (various m, 9 H, PPh3), 7.72 (‘‘d’’, 6H, ortho-PPh3, 3JHH = 7.2 Hz).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ꢀ50 °C, TMS): cis-[PdCl2(CNXy)(PPh3)]
3
7 h (margin of error:
DMp, 3 °C; Dm
, 3 cmꢀ1). The purity of the iso-
(1, 71.4%) d: 1.97 (s, 6H, Me), 7.03 (d, 2H, JHH = 7.6 Hz, meta-Xy),
7.23 (t, 1H, 3JHH = 7.6 Hz, para-Xy, overlapped with para-Xy of com-
plex 2), 7.46–7.55 (various m, 9H, meta- + para-PPh3, overlapped
with the homologous resonances in 3), 7.78 (dd, 6H, ortho-PPh3,
lated complex 1 could be attributed to the fact that 1 is the major
species in the reaction mixture (1:2:3 = 10:1:1 in CDCl3 at ꢀ50 °C)
and/or to differences in solubility. In fact, 1 was the only species
that crystallized when Et2O was layered over a solution of the
reaction mixture in CH2Cl2.
4
3JHH = 7.8 Hz, JHH = 4.8 Hz); cis-[PdCl2(CNXy)2] (2, 14.3%): 1.65 (s,
3
3H, Me), 6.95 (d, 2H, meta-Xy, JHH = 7.6 Hz), 7.20 (t, 1H, para-Xy,
3JHH = 7.6 Hz, overlapped with para-Xy of complex 1); trans-
[PdCl2(PPh3)2] (3, 14.3%): 7.46–7.55 (various m, 9H, meta- + para-
PPh3, overlapped with the homologous resonances in 1), 7.69 (m,
6H, ortho-PPh3). 13C{1H} APT NMR (100.8 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C,
TMS): d 18.2 (Me), 127.9 (meta-Xy), 128.8 (br s, meta-Ph, PPh3),
130.3 (para-Xy), 131.8 (br s, para-Ph, PPh3), 134.4 (br s, ortho-Ph,
PPh3), 135.6 (ortho-Xy). Pd–CNXy and ipso-Ph(PPh3) not observed.
13C{1H} APT NMR (100.8 MHz, CDCl3, ꢀ50 °C, TMS): cis-
[PdCl2(CNXy)(PPh3)] (1) d: 18.1 (Me), 124.5 (Pd–CN), 127.7
(meta-Xy, coincident with meta-Xy for complex 2), 128.0 (d, ipso-
PPh3, JCP = 58.5 Hz), 128.6 (d, meta-PPh3, JCP = 12 Hz), 130.3 (para-
Xy), 131.9 (d, para-PPh3, JCP = 2 Hz), 134.0 (d, ortho-PPh3,
JCP = 11.0 Hz), 135.4 (ortho-Xy); cis-[PdCl2(CNXy)2] (2): d 17.8
(Me), 123.3 (Pd–CNXy), 127.7 (meta-Xy, coincident with meta-Xy
for complex 1), 130.9 (para-Xy), 134.3 (ortho-Xy); trans-
[PdCl2(PPh3)2] (3): d 126.8 (‘‘t’’, ipso-PPh3, N = 54.0 Hz), 129.0 (‘‘t’’,
meta-PPh3, N = 11 Hz), 132.1 (s, para-PPh3), 133.7 (‘‘t’’, ortho-PPh3,
N = 12 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (162.3 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): d 26.2 (v br
3.2. Structure description
The crystal structure of 1 (Fig. 1 and Table 1) shows the
palladium atom in a slightly distorted square planar environment,
coordinated to a PPh3, a XyNC and two chloro ligands in mutually
cis-disposition. The bond distances and angles are similar to those
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinement of complex 1.
Formula
Formula weight
T (K)
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
C27H24Cl2NPPd
570.74
100(2)
triclinic
ꢀ
P1
9.8101(6)
11.8776(7)
12.0372(7)
87.239(2)
67.363(2)
78.693(2)
1268.82(13)
2
1.494
1.020
576
0.14 ꢂ 0.09 ꢂ 0.02
1.83–28.18
14774
5704 (0.0316)
0.9799–0.8555
0/291
b (Å)
c (Å)
s).
31P{1H}
NMR
(162.3 MHz,
CDCl3,
ꢀ50 °C):
cis-
a
(°)
b (°)
[PdCl2(CNXy)(PPh3)] (1): d 29.3; trans-[PdCl2(PPh3)2] (3): d 22.8.
Crystals of 1 suitable for an X-ray diffraction study grew at 4 °C
after layering Et2O over a CH2Cl2 solution containing an equimolar
mixture of PdCl2, PPh3 and XyNC. After drying the crystals in an
oven at 70 °C for 7 h, the melting point and IR spectrum coincided
with those of the crude material.
c
(°)
V (Å3)
Z
qcalcd (Mg mꢀ3
)
l
(Mo K
a
) (mmꢀ1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
h (°)
Number of reflections collected
Number of independent reflections (Rint
Transmission
2.4. X-ray crystallography
)
Complex 1 was measured on a Bruker Smart APEX machine.
Restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F2
1.057
0.0373
0.0820
0.802/ꢀ0.526
Data were collected using monochromated Mo K
a radiation. The
R1 (I > 2
wR2 (all reflections)
Largest difference in peak and hole (eÅꢀ3
r(I))
structure was solved by direct methods. It was refined anisotropi-
cally on F2. The methyl groups were refined using rigid groups, and
the other hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model.
)