5332 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 16, 2001
Laali et al.
gens as a broad singlet at δ 3.60; corroboratory 13C NMR
evidence, in particular low field resonances at δ 228.3
(C), 174.2 (C), and 132.1 (CH)]. Quenching gave a mixture
of 2,7-dimethyl-4,5,9,10-tetrahydropyrene (13a ); 2,7-di-
methyl-4,5-dihydropyrene (13b); and 2,7-dimethylpyrene
(13c) in variable amounts in different reactions but with
13a always predominating.14
15a 2+ is especially appealing since the methyls are in the
correct position to stabilize the charge.16,17
Under surprisingly mild conditions, the [e]-ring benz-
annelated derivative of Boekelheide’s DMDHP is dipro-
2+
tonated at the adjacent C-4/C-5 positions to give 6H2
and subsequently undergoes slow two-electron oxidation
to give 62+. The observed double protonation (6H22+) on
adjacent positions (C-4/C-5) in the DMDHP skeleton is
Sta ble Ion Stu d y of th e [e]-Rin g Ben za n n ela ted
Der iva tive 6 a n d Com p a r ison w ith 5. Annulene 6
reacted with FSO3H/SO2ClF at dry ice/acetone temper-
ature to produce a dark-red solution whose NMR spectral
data are fully consistent with the formation of the
2+
unprecedented. Dication 6H2
may be viewed as a
dimethyldihydrotriphenylene dication with an ethano
bridge and represents a benzannelated analogue of 142+
.
Although the direction of shielding and deshielding in
62+ is similar to the dianion 32-, its magnitude is
significantly less.
2+
symmetrical diprotonation dication 6H2 as the major
component (ca. 90%),15a with double protonation occurring
at the adjacent C-4/C-5 positions (Scheme 1, Figure 3).
Relative NMR assignments for the C-4/C-5 methylene
protons is unambiguous because the pseudoaxial protons
gave NOE with the internal methyls, whereas the pseu-
doequatorial ones exhibited NOE with the H-3 ring
protons. The internal methyls move from -1.56 ppm in
the precursor to 0.69 ppm in 6H22+ and show deshielded
ring protons (at δ 9.06 and 8.41) (Figure 3). Positive
charge is highly localized into the two cyclohexadienyl
rings, giving remarkably large ∆δ13C values for C-2/C-7,
C-3a/C-5a, and C-8a/C-12b carbons (between 68 and 40
ppm), with relatively minor delocalization into the an-
nelated [e]-ring. Storing the sample at dry ice/acetone
temperature led to the formation of 62+ at the expense
of 6H22+, such that their ratio reached 4:1 after 1 week.15b
The two-electron oxidation dication 62+ exhibits three
shielded annulene proton singlets with strongly deshield-
ed internal methyls (by 6.32 ppm) (Figure 3). The charge
Mode of benzannelation coupled to the inductively
stabilizing effect of the But groups appear to have a sig-
nificant influence on the ability of the annulene core to
become doubly charged (via diprotonation or two-electron
oxidation), since 5 behaved very differently under the
same set of conditions. A significant feature is reversal
of the ring-current effects between the 14π- (4n + 2)
dication, 6H22+, and the 16π- (4n) oxidation dication, 62+
.
Exp er im en ta l Section
The [2.2]metacyclophane monoenes and benzannelated di-
methyldihydropyrenes were available from previous studies
(in R.H.M.’s laboratory).2,18FSO3H (Allied and Aldrich) and
SbF5 (Fluorochem and Aldrich) were distilled in an all-glass
distillation unit under a dry nitrogen atmosphere and stored
in Nalgene bottles with Teflon caps. Standard procedures were
used for the preparation of superacid solutions and for
synthesis and purification of SO2ClF.19
NMR spectra were recorded at 500 MHz between -70 and
-50 °C. Complete assignments were achieved using 1H, 13C,
H/H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC aided by NOED spectra.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Sta ble Ion Gen er a tion . SO2ClF
(ca. 0.4 mL) was distilled into a 5-mm NMR tube containing
the substrate (10 mg) cooled to dry ice/acetone temperature.
To the resulting cold suspension, precooled superacid was
carefully added (2-3 drops) with efficient (vortex) mixing.
Then 2 drops of cold CD2Cl2 was added on top of the solution,
and the mixture was thoroughly mixed until homogeneous.
Qu en ch in g Exp er im en ts. The superacid solution was
carefully poured into ice/bicarbonate, and the mixture was
extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed (10%
NaCl) and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure, and the residue was analyzed by NMR.
2+
delocalization mode in 62+ and 6H2 is rather similar,
with the three carbon resonances due to C-2/C-7, C-3a/
C-5a, and C-8a/C-12a being the most deshielded. Quench-
ing of 62+ returned the skeletally intact 6. Interestingly,
protonation of the unsubstituted benz[e]annelated de-
rivative 5 under a similar set of conditions gave a mixture
of at least three monoprotonated [12]annulenium cations
(a green solution) with no evidence for diprotonation or
dication formation.
Mech a n istic In sigh t. The hitherto unknown 10π-
dications 142+ and 152+ were generated from methylated
[2.2]metacyclophane monoenes 10 and 11 and character-
ized by NMR. These anti-dimethyldihydroethanophenan-
threnium dications are equivalent to C-4/C-5 diprotonat-
ed trans-dimethyldihydropyrenes. A process involving
ene protonation, transannular ring closure, and oxidation
(loss of hydride) is envisioned for their formation. Alter-
natively, doubly ipso-protonated dications 15a 2+ and
14a 2+ (Scheme 1) may be the initially formed species that
rapidly convert to 142+ and 152+ by oxidation (H2 loss)
and transannular bond formation. Initial formation of
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported in part
by the NCI of NIH (R15 CA78235-01A1).
Su p p or t in g In for m a t ion Ava ila b le: 1H NMR and 13C
NMR spectra for 142+; H/H COSY and 13C NMR spectra for
6H22+; and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for 62+. This material is
J O0100594
(16) AM1 predicts however that 10f142+ and 11f152+ conversions
have lower ∆∆Hf than the corresponding 10f14a 2+ and 11f15a 2+
conversions.
(14) (a) Maxfield, M.; Bloch, A. N.; Cowan, D. O. J . Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 1789. (b) Mehta, G.; Shah, S. R. Indian J . Chem. 1990, 29B, 101.
(c) Reynders, P.; Kuhnle, W.; Zachariasse, K. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 3929.
(17) One of the reviewers suggested an alternative mechanism for
consideration involving initial “hydride abstraction” at the ethano
bridge, followed by transannular cyclization and protonation. Although
there is precedent for generation of certain carbocations by hydride
abstraction (i.e., trityl and tropylium using NO+ salts; see, for
example: Olah, G. A.; Laali, K. K.; Wang, X.; Prakash, G. K. S. Onium
Ions; Wiley: New York, 1998; p 42), it is difficult to visualize hydride
abstraction here as the “first step” for reactive substrates, such as 10
and 11, in protic superacids (instead of initial rapid protonation).
(18) (a) Mitchell, R. H.; Ward, T. R.; Wang, Y.; Dibble, P. W. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2601. (b) Mitchell, R. H.; Ward, T. R. Tetrahe-
dron 2001, 57, 3689.
(15) (a) Unidentified byproducts account for the remaining ∼10%.
(b) Formation of 6H2 and 62+ are envisaged in the following way:
2+
[formation of 62+ is a slower process whose contribution to the mixture
increases over time at the expense of 6H22+; competing oxidation is
probably due to minor equilibrium formation of 6 on prolonged storage].
(19) Laali, K. K.; Okazaki, T.; Coombs, M. M. J . Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 7399.