thermodynamic acidity constants of the buffer acids from the
literature and activity coefficients recommended by Bates.12
These rate profiles show acid-catalyzed and uncatalyzed
portions; the data were therefore analyzed using the rate law
of [eqn. (8)]. Least squares fitting gave the results
component and is consequently normal (kH/kD > 1) rather
than inverse; that on the ketonization of mandelic acid enol,
for example, is kH+/kD+ ¼ 3.3.15
The form of buffer catalysis is also different for quinone
methide decay from that for enol ketonization. In the quinone
methide reaction, the buffer base acts as a nucleophile, adding
directly to the methide methylene group.4b,d The strength of
the buffer reaction therefore depends on the nucleophilic
strength of the buffer base, and because acetate ion is a weak
nucleophile, buffer catalysis in acetic acid buffers is weak, as
observed here for o-quinone a-carbomethoxy-methide. Enol
ketonization, on the other hand, being a rate-determining
hydron transfer reaction, is catalyzed by buffers with buffer
catalysis increasing in proportion to the acid strength of the
buffer acid. Since acetic acid is a moderately strong general
acid, it is a good catalyst, and enol ketonization is catalyzed
strongly by acetic acid buffers, unlike the weak catalysis
observed here for o-quinone a-carbomethoxymethide. The
absence of general acid catalysis found here is, of course, also
consistent with a quinone methide reaction and not with an
enol ketonization.
þ
þ
kprof ¼ kuc þ kL ½L ꢄ
ð8Þ
kH+ ¼ (3.14 ꢃ 0.05) ꢁ 102 Mꢂ1
s
ꢂ1, kH+/kD+ ¼ 0.391 ꢃ 0.009,
(kuc)H O ¼ (5.40 ꢃ 0.08) ꢁ 10ꢂ1sꢂ1,(kuc)H O/(kuc)D O ¼ 1.22 ꢃ 0.03.
2
2
2
The slopes of the buffer dilution plots, kbuff , were separated
into their general acid, kHA , and general base, kB , components
with the aid of the relationship shown as [eqn. (9)], in which fA
is the fraction of buffer present in the acid form.
kbuff ¼ kB þ ðkHA ꢂ kBÞf A
ð9Þ
Least squares analysis showed that in the acetic acid solutions
the buffer reaction was wholly of the general base type, in both
H2O and D2O, with (kB)H O ¼ (2.27 ꢃ 0.14) ꢁ 101 Mꢂ1 sꢂ1 and
2
(kB)H O/(kB)D O ¼ 0.92 ꢃ 0.08. A similar analysis could not be
2
2
carried out for the biphosphate buffer solutions because mea-
surements were made at only one buffer ratio.
Additional support for identification of the presently
observed intermediate species as a quinone methide rather
than an enol comes from its UV absorbance. Quinone
methides have a cyclohexadienone structure which produces
a relatively long wavelength absorption band. o-Quinone
methide itself, for example, has lmax ffi 400 nm, not unlike
lmax ¼ 420 nm observed for the present intermediate species.
b-Phenylsubstituted enols, such as that which might be formed
from methyl 2-hydroxyphenyldiazoacetate, will have a styrene-
type chromophore with an absorption band at considerably
lower wavelengths; for example, lmax ¼ 268 nm for b,b-
dimethoxystyrene,16 and lmax ¼ 275 for the enol of methyl
mandelate.3
Rates of o-quinone a-carbomethoxymethide, 9, decay were
also measured using methyl 2-hydroxymandelate, 10, and
methyl 20-acetoxy-2-hydroxyphenylacetate, 11, as the photo-
chemical substrates. These measurements were made in dilute
aqueous (H2O) perchloric acid only, and the ionic strength
was maintained at 0.10 M by adding sodium perchlorate as
required. These data are summarized in Tables S3 and S4 of
the ESI.z
Discussion
We have shown in previous studies4b–c that the hydration of
quinone methides in aqueous solution occurs by acid-catalyzed
and uncatalyzed routes. The ketonization of enols, such as
those formed by conjugate addition of water to a-carbonyl-
carbenes in the photolysis of a-carbonyldiazo compounds
illustrated in eqn. (3), also occurs by acid-catalyzed and unca-
talyzed routes. The mechanisms of the two reactions, however,
are quite different, and that gives them distinctive kinetic signa-
tures by which they can easily be distinguished.
Quinone methide hydration catalyzed by the hydronium ion
occurs through rapid pre-equilibrium protonation of the qui-
none carbonyl oxygen atom followed by rate-determining cap-
ture of the carbocation so formed by a water molecule [eqn.
(10)].4b–c
Perhaps the strongest evidence of all supporting assignment
of a quinone methide structure to the intermediate species
observed here upon photolysis of methyl 2-hydroxyphenyldia-
zoacetate, 8, comes from the results obtained by flash photoly-
sis of methyl 2-hydroxymandelate, 10, and its acetate
derivative, methyl 20-acetoxy-2-hydroxyphenylacetate, 11.
Benzyl alcohols such as 10 are probably the most commonly
used substrates for photochemical generation of quinone
methides, and their acetate derivatives, such as 11, are even
better quinone methide precursors.4 It is not surprising, there-
fore, that flash photolysis of the benzyl alcohol 10 and its acet-
ate 11 produced a short-lived transient species with a UV
spectral band at lmax ¼ 420 nm, just like the transient
observed upon flash photolysis of the diazo substrate 8. Fig. 2
ð10Þ
Because the oxygen–hydrogen bonds of the water molecule
formed in the pre-equilibrium step are tighter than those of
the hydronium ion reactant,13 this produces an inverse solvent
isotope effect, just like that, kH+/kD+ ¼ 0.39 observed here.
The corresponding isotope effect on the hydration of the par-
ent o-quinone methide itself is kH+/kD+ ¼ 0.42.4b The hydro-
nium-ion catalyzed ketonization of enols, on the other hand,
occurs by rate-determining hydron transfer from the hydro-
nium ion to the b-carbon atom of the enol.14 The solvent
isotope effect on this process therefore contains a primary
Fig. 2 Comparison of rates of decay of o-quinone a-carbomethoxy-
methide generated from methyl 2-hydroxyphenyldiazoacetate, 8, (—);
methyl 2-hydroxymandelate, 10, (O); and methyl 20-acetoxy-2-hydro-
xyphenylacetate, 11, (D) in aqueous solution at 25 ꢀC.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 1039–1042
1041