Organic Process Research & Development
Article
various products were identified by coupling GC−MS and by
comparison with commercial products.
The various activity was calculated as defined: A (mmol/h/g)
= F*y/weight of catalyst with F: flow of the reactant (mmol/h),
y: yield of each product (mol %). The activity in mmol/h/
mmol metal was obtained by dividing the activity by the total
amount of metal.
The trichloromethoxylbenzene18 (0.125 mol) and the
catalyst (2.5 mmol) were introduced into the autoclave.12
The reaction then took place with continuous stirring, at the 50
°C during 1 h. At the end of the reaction, the autoclave was
cooled down and vented with dry dinitrogen in order to
eliminate the HCl and the unreacted HF. The content was
quenched with 30 mL of water/decane mixture (50/50), using
a stainless steel tank. After extraction with decane, the organic
phase was dried with MgSO4 and analysed by GC. The
fluorinated products and the chlorinated reactant were
quantified by gas chromatography using an internal standard
quantification method with decane as the internal standard.
The yield corresponds to the mol % of trichloromethox-
ylbenzene transformed into chlorodifluoromethoxybenzene
plus trifluoromethoxybenzene. The chromatograph was a
Varian 3800 equipped with 25 m BP1 capillary column
(SGE) with a temperature program from 50 to 240 °C.
The transformation of CF3CH2Cl into CF3CH2F19 was
carried out under atmospheric pressure in a fixed bed reactor at
380 °C.10,11
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My thanks to Arkema (Eric Lacroix) and Solvay (Franco
Metz) companies for their financial support and many fruitful
■
̧
is
discussions.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Brunet, S. Actual. Chim. 2006, 301−302, 73−77.
(2) Manzer, L. E. Catal. Today 1992, 13, 13−22.
(3) (Uddeholms Aktiebolag). FR 2079137 A5, 1971.
(4) Brunet, S.; Batiot, C.; Moriceau, P.; Thybaud, N. J. Mol. Catal., A:
Chem. 1999, 142, 183−186.
The commercial alumina was fluorinated by HF at 400 °C in
order to obtain a partial fluorinated support which was
stabilized under fluorination conditions with a surface area of
around 45 m2/g.10,11
(5) Brunet, S.; Requieme, B.; Colnay, E.; Barrault, J.; Blanchard, M.
Appl. Catal., B 1995, 5, 305−317.
(6) Brunet, S.; Boussand, B.; Martin, D. J. Catal. 1997, 171, 287−292.
́
(7) Brunet, S.; Boussand, B.; Rousset, A.; Andre, D. Appl. Catal., A
Zinc-doped chromium oxide catalysts supported over
partially fluorinated alumina (55% of AlF3) were prepared by
wetness impregnation of the fluorinated alumina with an
aqueous solution of chromic anhydride, zinc chloride, and
methanol. The reduction of CrVI into CrIII was carried out in
the presence of methanol. The impregnation of AlF3 was
carried out at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The
quantities of chromium and zinc corresponded to a total
amount of added components Zn+Cr) of around 10 wt % and
atomic ratios of Zn/(Zn+Cr) varying from 0 to 1. Then the
various catalysts were dried at 110 °C during one night under
atmospheric pressure. The precursors were decomposed during
the fluorination of the catalyst by HF at 380 °C during 2 h in a
dynamic flow reactor to produce the corresponding fluorinated
or oxyfluorinated materials. Chemical analyses of the elements
(chromium, zinc) were carried out after the fluorination step.
No significant variation of the specific surface could be noticed
whatever the catalyst after the treatment by HF during 2 h, as
reported in a previous paper.11 All the reactants were diluted in
helium. The flow rate of CF3CH2Cl was regulated at 50 °C (to
avoid any condensation) by a Brooks mass flowmeter. The
helium, O2, and HCl feeds were regulated at room temperature
by a Brooks mass flowmeter. The catalyst (sieved to a diameter
between 0.250 mm and 0.315 mm) was mixed with 6 cm3 of
Lonza graphite. When the reaction products emerged from the
reactor they were washed successively in two flasks containing
water and then in one containing potassium hydroxide (1 M)
to neutralize the unreacted hydrogen fluoride and HCl
produced by Cl/F exchanges. They were then dried on a 4 Å
molecular sieve. The organic reaction products were analyzed
online with a gas chromatograph (Varian GC 3400) equipped
with a flame ionization detector and a DB5 capillary column (J
and W Scientific). O2, HCl, and Cl2 were analyzed online with a
gas chromatograph equipped with a catharometer detector and
a DB5 capillary column (J and W Scientific). HCl and dioxygen
were injected into stoichiometric (HCl/O2 = 4) ratio.
1998, 168, 57−61.
(8) (Daikin Kogyo). BF 2.433.500, 1980.
(9) (Allied Signal Inc.). WO 97/07084, 1997.
(10) Loustaunau, A.; Fayolle-Romelaer, R.; Celerier, S.; Brunet, S. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2011, 132, 1262−1265.
(11) Loustaunau, A.; Fayolle-Romelaer, R.; Celerier, S.; D’Huysser,
A.; Gengembre, L.; Brunet, S. Catal. Lett. 2010, 138, 215−220.
(12) Salome, J.; Mauger, C.; Brunet, S.; Schanen, V. J. Fluorine Chem.
2004, 125, 1947−1950.
(13) Olah, G. A.; Welch, J. T.; Vankar, Y. D.; Nojima, M.; Kerekes, I.;
Olah, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44 (22), 3872−3881.
(14) Piou, A.; Celerier, S.; Brunet, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131,
1241−1246.
(15) Piou, A.; Celerier, S.; Brunet, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 2012, 134,
103−106.
(16) Baasner, B.; Klauke, E. J. Fluorine Chem. 1982, 19, 553−564.
(17) Salome, J.; Bachmann, C.; De Oliveira-Vigier, K.; Brunet, S.;
Lopez, J. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008, 279, 119−127.
(18) Iijima, A.; Amii, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6013−6015.
(19) Koroniak, H.; Walkowiak, J.; Grys, K.; Rajchel, A.; Alty, A.;
Boisson, R. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 1245−1251.
E
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500182w | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX