8694
B. Alcaide et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 8693–8695
Table 1. N-Allyl cleavage of different-sized lactams
Starting substrates, N-allyl lactams 1a–h, were prepared
using standard methodology. N-Allyl lactams 1a–c
were obtained via reaction of the corresponding NH-
lactams with allyl bromide in the presence of sodium
hydride,14 while 2-azetidinones 1d–h were obtained
from the corresponding allyl imine, through Staudinger
reaction with the appropriate alkoxyacetyl chloride in
the presence of Et3N.15
Firstly, we tested as a model reaction the deprotection
of N-allyl l-valerolactam 1a. Treatment of allylic
amide 1a with Grubbs’ carbene Cl2(Cy3P)2RuꢁCHPh
under optimised reaction conditions (5 mol% catalyst,
0.03 M, toluene, 110°C)16 resulted in clean formation of
the corresponding enamide as an isomeric mixture (1:1)
E/Z in good isolated yield (71%) after chromatographic
purification. The catalytic scission of the internal CꢁC
was attained by using the system of RuCl3–NaIO4 in
1,2-dichloroethane–H2O (1:1), followed by an aqueous
work-up in slightly basic conditions (sat. aq. NaHCO3
containing a catalytic amount of Na2CO3). Thus, the
N-unsubstituted 2-piperidone 2a was obtained in a 70%
yield. Exposure of N-allyl g-butyrolactam 1b and N-
allyl -pyroglutamic acid ethyl ester (+)-1c to the above
L
sequential catalytic conditions smoothly afforded the
NH-lactams 2b and (+)-2c. Next, we decide to test the
N-allyl cleavage protocol in the strained four-mem-
bered lactam series. Racemic as well as enantiopure
allylic b-lactams 2d–h were conveniently deprotected to
the corresponding NH-b-lactams by using both ruthe-
nium catalysts (Table 1). Under the reaction conditions,
the intermediate N-formyl lactams accumulate in the
reaction mixture immediately after the RuCl3–NaIO4
system is added over the enamide, and can be isolated
under a neutral work-up. Importantly, the stereochemi-
cal integrity of the stereogenic centres at the lactam
rings, when applicable, remained unaltered during the
transformation of N-allyl compounds 1 into NH-prod-
ucts 2.
References
1. For pertinent reviews, see: (a) Kant, J.; Walker, D. G. In
the Organic Chemistry of i-Lactams; Georg, G. I., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1993; p. 121; (b) Durckheimer,
W.; Blumbach, J.; Lattrell, R.; Scheunemann, K. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 180.
2. Suffness, M. Taxol Science and Applications; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995.
3. (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999; (b)
Kocienski, P. J. Protecting Groups; Georg Thieme Verlag:
Stuttgart, New York, 1994.
4. Kronenthal, D. K.; Han, C. Y.; Taylor, M. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1982, 47, 2765.
5. A new solid-phase approach to NH-b-lactams has been
recently described: Dasgupta, S. K.; Banik, B. K. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9445.
This transformation tolerates different substituents at
the lactam ring, such as aryl, heteroaryl, alkoxy, sily-
loxy, dioxolanyl, and carboxyalkyl moieties. Of special
interest are the furan and electron-rich arene moieties,
both of them sensitive to oxidative deprotection condi-
tions, as well as the acid labile silyl ether and acetonide
groups.
In conclusion, we have presented a new convenient
methodology for the catalytic deprotection of N-allylic
lactams. This protocol is tolerant towards different
functionalities as well as the stereocentres present in the
ring.
6. It has been described very recently the radical-promoted
deprotection of N-Cbz derivatives of amides: Bennasar,
M.-L.; Roca, T.; Padulle´s, A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 569.
7. Guibe´, F. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2967.
8. (a) Cainelli, G.; DaCol, M.; Galletti, P.; Giacomini, D.
Synlett. 1997, 923; (b) Kanno, O.; Miyauchi, M.;
Kawamoto, I. Heterocycles 2000, 53, 173.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the DGI-MCYT (Project
BQU2000-0645) for financial support. J.M.A. thanks
the UCM for a predoctoral grant.