Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 6
ently achieved by conformational control of the C2-
Corresponding Author
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
appendage via strong interaction of its terminal carboxylate
with the conserved Arg395 and Arg413 (Fig. 2b). This confor-
mational control is thus believed to be the point where
MenD diverges from other ThDP-dependent enzymes (Fig.
4). In its absence, the ThDP-bound intermediate naturally
falls to an energy minima after decarboxylation by taking the
energetically favorable enamine structure and simultaneously
forming the C2α-OH to N4’ hydrogen bond in most known
ThDP-dependent
Zhihong Guo, E-mail: chguo@ust.hk.
Present Addresses
‖ School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North
Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, Scotland, UK.
⊥Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Bagley
Hall 425, Box 351700, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700, USA.
┬Section of Structural Biology, Department of Medicine, Im-
perial College London, South Kensington SW7 2AZ, UK.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2-
R1 =-CH2CH2OPO3-PO3
hydrogen-bonding
Arg395
O
Arg395
O
Arg413
O
Arg395
O
Arg413
O
Arg413
O
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
hydrogen bond/salt bridge
H
OH
S
OH
OH
MenD
OOC
H
N
R1
N
H
H
N
H
S
S
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
H
S
R1
R1
N
N
N
R1
N
H
α-KG
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
We thank Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF)
and National Center for Protein Science Shanghai (NCPSS)
for access to the beamlines BL17U and BL19U and the on-site
technical support. This work was supported by GRF601413
and N_HKUST621/13 from the RGC and SBI14SC05 from the
UGC of the HKSAR government. The coordinates and struc-
ture factors of the MenD complexes have been deposited in
the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 5EJ4, 5EJ5, 5EJ6,
5EJ7, 5EJ8, 5EJ9, and 5EJA.
activated ThDP
H
H
Intermediate II
Intermediate I
C2-C2α
xrotation
Arg395
Arg395
Arg413
Arg413
O
O
O
O
strain
strain
HO
HO
H
S
H
S
R1
R1
N
H
N H
N
N
N
N
N
REFERENCES
N
Acyl anion
Enamine
1.
2.
Kluger, R.; Tittmann, K. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1797–1833.
Fiedler, E.; Thorell, S.; Sandalova, T.; Golbik, R.; König, S.;
Schneider, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 591.
Nakai, T.; Nakagawa, N.; Maoka, N.; Masui, R.; Kuramitsu, S.;
Kamiya, N. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 1011.
Inaccessible intermediates
Figure 4. Proposed formation mechanism of the tetrahedral
intermediate in MenD catalysis. The strong interaction at the
terminal carboxylate is proposed to restrict the rotation
around C2-C2α so that no hydrogen bond is formed between
C2α-OH and N4’ of the cofactor throughout the reaction pro-
cess to disable formation of the enamine intermediate and
enable the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate. Inter-
mediates I and II are Model I and II (Fig. 2c), respectively.
3.
4. Wille, G.; Meyer, D.; Steinmetz, A.; Hinze, E.; Golbik, R.;
Tittmann, K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 324.
Wagner, T.; Barilone, N.; Alzari, P. M.; Bellinzoni, M. Bio-
chem. J. 2014, 457, 425.
5.
6. Meyer, D.; Neumann, P.; Koers, E.; Sjuts, H.; Lüdtke, S.; Shel-
drick, G. M.; Ficner, R.; Tittmann, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 2012, 109, 10867.
enzymes.2-5 Whereas in its presence in MenD, the intermedi-
ate is forced to retain the tetrahedral structure after decar-
boxylation, which is stabilized by protonation but remains
catalyticcally active due to the short distance between C2α-H
and N4’ of the neutral iminopyrimidine (Fig. 4). The role of
this conformational control is supported by more than 100-
fold activity decrease in Bacillus subtilis MenD mutated at
the equivalent residue of E. coli MenD Arg395.13
7.
Machius, M.; Wynn, R. M.; Chuang, J. L.; Li, J.; Kluger, R.; Yu,
D.; Tomchick, D. R.; Brautigam, C. A.; Chuang, D. T. Struc-
ture 2006, 14, 287.
8. Berthold, C. L. Toyota, C. G.; Moussatche, P.; Wood, M. D.;
Leeper, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Lindqvist, Y. Structure 2007, 15,
853.
9. Suzuki, R.; Katayama, T.; Kim, B.-J.; Wakagi, T.; Shoun, H.;
Ashida, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Fushinobu, S. J. Biol. Chem. 2010,
285, 34279.
10. Jiang, M.; Cao, Y.; Guo, Z. F.; Chen, M.; Chen, X.; Guo, Z. Bio-
chemistry 2007, 46, 10979.
11. Jiang, M.; Chen, M.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sze, K. H.; Chen, X.;
Guo, Z. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4765.
12. Dawson, A.; Fyfe, P. K.; Hunter, W. N. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 384,
1353.
13. Dawson, A.; Chen, M.; Fyfe, P. K.; Guo, Z.; Hunter, W. N. J.
Mol. Biol. 2010, 401, 253.
14. Malandrinos, G.; Louloudi, M.; Mitsopoulou, C. A.; Butler, I.
S.; Bau, R.; Hadjiliadis, N. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 437.
15. Berthold, C. L.; Gocke, D.; Wood, M. D.; Leeper, F.; Poh, M.;
Schneider, G. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2007, 63, 1217.
16. Versees, W.; Spaepen, S.; Wood, M. D.; Leeper, F. J.; Vander-
leyden, J.; Steyaert, J. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 35269.
17. Pei, X. Y.; Titman, C. M.; Frank, R. A.; Leeper, F. J.; Luisi, B. F.
Structure 2008, 16, 1860.
Besides being different from the enamine intermediate, the
tetrahedral MenD intermediate is also different from the
previously identified noncanonical enamine intermediates in
both structure and catalytic mode.6-9 It is strained and may
be required for the catalysis of the unique 1, 4-addition reac-
tion. Further studies are needed to better understand its dif-
ferences from the canonical enamine intermediate in reactiv-
ity and catalytic mechanism.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and additional results in Figures S1-
S6 and Table S1-S2. This material is available free of charge
18. Jordan, F. J. Org. Chem. 47, 2748–2753 (1982).
19. Bhasin, M.; Billinsky, J. L.; Palmer, D. R. J. Biochemistry 2003,
42, 13496.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
ACS Paragon Plus Environment