120
X.-J. Zhao et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 687 (2004) 119–124
(730 mg, 5.6 mmol) and the suspension was stirred for 1 h.
The suspension was then filtered and to the filtrate was
added Ni(ClO4)2·6H2O (36.6 mg, 0.1 mmol), resulting in a
clear light-green solution. The pH value of this solution was
adjusted to ca. 6–7 by further adding several drops of
triethylamine with stirring, and the solution turns yellow.
The stirring was continued for 1 h under reflux, and then the
resultant solution was filtered after cooling to room
temperature. Vapor diffusion of diethyl ether to this filtrate
yielded X-ray quality yellow block crystals in ca. 80% yield.
Found: C, 49.2; H, 5.1; N, 10.4. Calc. for C22H27N4ClO6Ni:
C, 49.5; H, 5.1; N, 10.2%. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm21): 3424s
(br), 2929w, 1624m, 1592w, 1577w, 1552w, 1496m,
1459m, 1446s, 1379w, 1321w, 1286w, 1226w, 1193w,
1156m, 1125vs, 1108vs, 1091vs, 1032m, 989s, 932s, 920s,
863s, 835s, 813s, 772s, 689s, 623s, 573m. lmax (nm) (1
(dm3 mol21 cm21)) (MeOH): 438 (287) and 315 (9500).
Caution. Although no problems were encountered in this
study, transition metal perchlorate complexes are poten-
tially explosive and should be handled with proper
precautions.
Chart 1.
presence of sodium bicarbonate according to the very
similar literature procedure [24]. All reagents for synthesis
and analysis were obtained commercially with analytical
grade and used as received. 1H NMR spectrum was recorded
on a Bruker AC-P 200 spectrometer (300 MHz) at 298 K
with tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. FT-IR
spectra (KBr pellets) were taken on a FT-IR 170SX
(Nicolet) spectrometer and electronic spectra with a Hitachi
UV-3010 spectrophotometer. Carbon, hydrogen and nitro-
gen analyses were performed on a Perkin–Elmer 240C
analyzer.
2.4. Crystallographic data collection and structure
determination
2.2. Synthesis of the ligand
A solution of DACO·2HBr (2.76 g, 10 mmol) and LiOH
(0.84 g, 20 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (40 ml) was stirred
severely for ca. 4 h and filtered at room temperature. Then,
4-chloroacetophenoneoxime (3.4 g, 20 mmol) was added
to the filtrate with stirring. After addition of NaHCO3
(1.68 g, 20 mmol), the mixture was stirred under ice-cooling
for 1 h (to keep the pH value of the mixture at 8–9 during
this period), and then at room temperature for an additional
2 days. The precipitated white solid was filtered off and
washed once with cold ethanol. The white solid was
suspended in methanol (100 ml) and stirred at ambient
temperature for 20 min and then filtered off. This process of
suspension and stirring in methanol was repeated altogether
four times. The solid was discarded and the combined
filtrate (,400 ml) was evaporated under reduced pressure
to yield the light-yellow pure ligand in its hydrochloride
form in 52% yield. Found: C, 58.1; H, 6.5; N, 12.4. Calc. for
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of complex 1 were
performed on a BRUKER SMART 1000 CCD diffract-
ometer equipped with a graphite crystal monochromator
situated in the incident beam for data collection. The
determination of unit cell parameters and data collections
˚
were performed with Mo Ka radiation (l ¼ 0.71073 A) by
4 scan mode in the range of 2:20 , u , 25:038 at
293(2) K. All data were corrected by semi-empirical
method using SADABS program. The program SAINT [27]
was used for integration of the diffraction profiles.
The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS
program of the SHELXL-97 package and refined with SHELXL
[28]. NiII center was located from the E-map and other non-
hydrogen atoms were located in successive difference
Fourier syntheses. The final refinement was performed by
full matrix least-squares methods with anisotropic thermal
parameters for non-hydrogen atoms on F2: The hydrogen
atoms of the ligand were placed in the geometrically
calculated positions (the hydrogen atom of the protonated
oxime group was first found in a difference electron density
map, and then placed in the calculated site) and included in
the final refinement in the riding model approximation with
displacement parameters derived from the parent atoms to
which they were bonded. The refinement converged to final
1
C22H28N4O2·2HCl: C, 58.3; H, 6.7; N, 12.4%. H NMR
(CD3OD): d 1.89–1.92 (m, 4H), 3.00 (t, J ¼ 5:6 Hz; 8H),
3.74 (s, 4H), 7.36–7.45 (m, 6H), 7.54–7.57 (m, 4H). IR
(KBr pellet, cm21): 3431s (br), 3187vs, 3055m, 2959w,
2933w, 2919w, 2812m, 1961vw, 1897vw, 1818vw, 1649m,
1601w, 1577w, 1494s, 1464vs, 1443s, 1415s, 1388m,
1290s, 1264m, 1192m, 1147m, 1104m, 1062m, 1042m,
1024m, 985vs, 926m, 876w, 849m, 801w, 767s, 733w,
699vs, 676s, 590m, 578m.
R ¼ 0.0549, wR ¼ 0.0801, S ¼ 0.988, ðD=sÞmax
¼
ðD=sÞmin ¼ 0:000: The ratio of minimum to maximum
apparent transmission is 0.7794. Molecular graphics were
drawn with the program package XP. Further crystal-
lographic data and experimental details for structural
analyses of the title complex are summarized in Table 1,
2.3. Synthesis of the title complex 1
[Ni(HL)]ClO4 (1). To methanol (20 ml) were added the
oxime ligand H2L·2HCl (45.3 mg, 0.1 mmol) and NaClO4