Decarbonylation of Aryl Ketones
Organometallics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2004 533
of 2-ethyl-5,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzophenone and [1,2,4-
tBu3CpRh(CO)]2. After that, unreacted 3,3′-bis(trifluorometh-
yl)benzophenone was eluted. Rf(3,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)-
biphenyl, hexanes) ) 0.39. Rf(2-ethyl-5,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)-
benzophenone, 4/1 hexanes/dichloromethane) ) 0.28. Rf([1,2,4-
t-Bu3CpRh(CO)]2, 4/1 hexanes/dichloromethane) ) 0.35. Rf-
(3,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzophenone, 4/1 hexanes/dichlo-
romethane) ) 0.19.
Deca r bon yla tion of Ben zop h en on e (10c). The ketone
was purchased from Aldrich. The following data points were
acquired (time, conversion to 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)(C2H4), con-
version to [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 with respect to 1,2,4-tBu3-
CpRh(C2H4)2, conversion to the known 2-ethylbenzophenone26
with respect to benzophenone: 1 h, 23%, 15%, 30%; 2 h, 19%,
25%, 38%; 3 h, 15%, 42%, no further change in the amount of
ethylated benzophenone; 4.5 h, 11%, 46%; 6.5 h, 8%, 50%; 10.5
h, <5%, 61%.
observed. The mixture was then heated at 150 °C for 18 h.
The color changed to greenish blue, and the formation of [1,2,4-
tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 (ca. 70% conversion) was observed by 1H
NMR. After that, the mixture was chromatographed on silica
gel with hexanes as eluent. After a trace of unreacted 2 and
7, stilbene (0.016 g) was eluted, contaminated with <5% of
bibenzyl. The column was dried out, and the residual mixture
was left on the silica gel for 1 day to decompose the rhodium
complexes. After that, elution with toluene/hexane (1/2) af-
forded a mixture of starting ketone with unidentified impuri-
ties followed by impure chalcone (0.027 g). The 1H NMR
spectra of chalcone and stilbene were compared with the
spectra of commercial materials (Aldrich). Rf(stilbene, hexanes)
) 0.34. Rf(chalcone, 1/1 hexanes/toluene) ) 0.15.
A mixture of chalcone (0.108 g, 0.52 mmol, Aldrich) and
1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(C2H4)2 (0.20 g, 0.52 mmol) was heated in
1
hexanes (1 mL) for 18 h at 120 °C. At this point assay by H
Deca r bon yla tion of 4,4′-Dim eth ylben zop h en on e (10d ).
The ketone was purchased from Aldrich. The following data
points were acquired (time, conversion to 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)-
(C2H4), conversion to [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 with respect to
1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(C2H4)2, conversion to 2-ethyl-4,4′-dimethyl-
benzophenone with respect to 4,4′-dimethylbenzophenone: 1
h, 20%, 16%, 28%; 2 h, 13%, 29%, 37%; 3 h, 11%, 33%, no
further change in the amount of ethylated benzophenone; 4.5
h, 9%, 35%; 6.5 h, 7%, 40%; 10.5 h, 5%, 50%.
Deca r bon yla tion of 4-(Tr iflu or om eth yl)a cetop h en on e
(10e). The ketone was purchased from Aldrich. The following
data points were acquired (time, conversion to 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh-
(CO)(C2H4), conversion to [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 with respect
to 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(C2H4)2, conversion to the mixture of 2-ethyl-
4-(trifluoromethyl)acetophenone and 2,6-diethyl-4-(trifluoro-
methyl)acetophenone with respect to 4-(trifluoromethyl)-
acetophenone: 1 h, <2%, <2%, 6%; 4 h, 11%, 4%, 16%; 7 h,
11%, 11%, 20%; 11 h, 10%, 20%, 25%; 15 h, 7%, 23%, 27%; 23
h, 4%, 30%, no further change in the amount of ethylated
acetophenones; 36 h, <2%, 34%.
After thermolysis the reaction mixture was chromato-
graphed (silica gel) in hexanes followed by 4/1 hexanes/toluene
and then 3/1 hexanes/toluene. [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 was
eluted, followed by a mixture of the known 2-ethyl-4-(trifluo-
romethyl)acetophenone and 2,6-diethyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)-
acetophenone.27 After that 4-(trifluoromethyl)acetophenone
was eluted. Rf(hexanes) ) 0.39. Rf(2-ethyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)-
acetophenone and 2,6-diethyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)acetophenone,
4/1 hexanes/toluene) ) 0.20. Rf([1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2, 4/1
hexanes/toluene) ) 0.38. Rf(4-(trifluoromethyl)acetophenone,
4/1 hexanes/toluene) ) 0.13. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)toluene was
not isolated due to volatility; it was observed in the crude
reaction mixture by NMR.
Deca r bon yla tion of Acetop h en on e (10f). The ketone was
purchased from Aldrich. The following data points were
acquired (time, conversion to 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)(C2H4), con-
version to [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 with respect to 1,2,4-tBu3-
CpRh(C2H4)2, conversion to 2-ethylacetophenone28 with respect
to acetophenone: 1 h, <2%, <2%, <2%; 4 h, <2%, <2%, <10%;
7 h, 7%, <2%, <10%; 11 h, 9%, 4%, ND; 15 h, 7%, 9%, ND; 23
h, 5%, 17%, ND; 36 h, <2%, 24%, 18%.
NMR showed >95% conversion to the product, which was
identical with the product obtained by the thermolysis of
â-phenylpropiophenone and 1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(C2H4)2 at 120 °C.
The reaction mixture was evaporated and the residue twice
recrystallized from acetone at -30 °C to afford 0.188 g (66.4%)
of rust-colored crystals. The structure was verified by X-ray
1
crystallography. H NMR (C6D12): 7.99-7.87 (m, 2H); 7.36-
7.19 (m, 5H); 7.14-7.04 (m, 2H); 7.02-6.92 (m, 1H); 5.95 (dd,
1H; J 1 ) 8.3 Hz, J 2 ) 0.8 Hz); 4.25 (d, J ) 1.9 Hz); 3.85 (d, J
) 1.9 Hz); 3.4 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz); 1.41 (s, 9H); 1.17 (s, 9H); 0.89
(s, 9H).
13C{1H} NMR (C6D12): 144.9; 139.1; 130.5 (d, J Rh-C
5.9 Hz; CdO); 129.6; 128.5; 128.1; 127.1; 125.5; 116.1 (d, J Rh-C
)
) 6.1 Hz); 114.1 (d, J Rh-C
) 7.4 Hz); 110.8 (d, J Rh-C ) 7.9 Hz);
81.7 (d, J Rh-C
) 5.4 Hz); 77.8 (d, J Rh-C ) 8.7 Hz); 71.9 (d, J Rh-C
) 6.6 Hz); 61.0 (d, J Rh-C
) 13.9 Hz); 34.1; 33.5; 33.3; 32.5; 31.4;
30.8. The signal of one aromatic carbon could not be located.
Anal. Calcd for C32H41RhO: C, 70.58; H, 7.59. Found: C, 70.41;
H, 7.65.
P r ep a r a tive-Sca le Deca r bon yla tion of 4,4′-Dim eth yl-
ben zop h en on e (10d ). In the glovebox a Teflon-stoppered
NMR tube (J . Young) was charged with the rhodium complex
2 (0.059 g, 0.15 mmol), 4,4′-dimethylbenzophenone (0.106 g,
0.50 mmol, Aldrich), and cyclohexane-d12 (0.5 mL) and heated
at 120 °C for 17 h. The reaction mixture was purified by
chromatography in hexanes as eluent to give 4,4′-dimethylbi-
phenyl (0.017 g, 62% based on 2). The elution was continued
using 3/1 hexanes/toluene to give [1,2,4-tBu3CpRh(CO)]2 (0.02
g, 37%). After that, elution was continued with 1/1 hexanes/
toluene to give 2-ethyl-4,4′-dimethylbenzophenone (0.047 g,
66%) and unreacted 4,4′-dimethylbenzophenone (0.029 g, 27%).
The 1H NMR spectrum of 4,4′-dimethylbiphenyl was compared
with the spectrum of the commercial material (Aldrich). Rf-
(4,4′-dimethylbiphenyl, hexanes) ) 0.28. Rf(2-ethyl-4,4′-dim-
ethylbenzophenone, toluene) ) 0.39. Rf(4,4′-dimethylbenzophe-
none, toluene) ) 0.31.
Characterization data for 2-ethyl-4,4′-dimethylbenzophe-
1
none are as follows. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.72-7.66 (m, 2H);
7.24-7.20 (m, 2H); 7.16 (d, 1H; J ) 7.7 Hz); 7.13 (s, 1H); 7.02
(d, 1H; J ) 7.7 Hz); 2.64 (q, 2H; J ) 7.5 Hz); 2.40 (s, 3H); 2.38
(s, 3H); 1.14 (t, 3H; J ) 7.5 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ
198.4; 143.8; 143.2; 140.2; 135.8; 135.7; 130.3; 130.2; 129.0;
128.7; 125.7; 26.4; 21.6; 21.4; 16.0. Anal. Calcd for C17H18O:
C, 85.67; H, 7.61. Found: C, 85.13; H, 7.62.
Deca r bon yla tion of â-P h en ylp r op iop h en on e: P r ep a -
r a tion of th e Ch a lcon e Ad d u ct 13. In the glovebox a Teflon-
stoppered NMR tube (J . Young) was charged with the rhodium
complex 2 (0.097 g, 0.25 mmol), â-phenylpropiophenone (0.052
g, 0.25 mmol, Lancaster), and cyclohexane-d12 (0.5 mL, Cam-
bridge Isotopes). The mixture was thermolyzed at 120 °C for
35 h. At that point the mixture was red-brown and an
incomplete conversion (ca. 50%) to intermediate 13 was
P r ep a r a tive-Sca le Deca r bon yla tion of 3,3′-Bis(tr iflu o-
r om eth yl)ben zop h en on e (10b). In the glovebox a Kontes
flask was charged with the rhodium complex 2 (0.098 g, 0.25
mmol), 3,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzophenone (0.318 g, 1.0
mmol, Aldrich), and toluene (3 mL). The reaction mixture was
heated at 135 °C for 23 h. Crude NMR showed the presence
of only 10b, 11b, 12b, 4, and 7 in the reaction mixture at that
point. The reaction mixture was purified by chromatography
in hexanes, eluting 3,3′-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl contami-
nated with 7 (0.07 g of impure material, contained 0.06 g of
biphenyl (82.2%) and 0.01 g of 7). The elution was continued
(26) Kobayashi, K.; Mannami, T.; Kawakita, M.; Tokimatsu, J .;
Konishi, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1994, 67, 582.
(27) Busch, S.; Leitner, W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 192.
(28) Fleming, I.; Morgan, I. T.; Sarkar, A. K. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 2749.