SYNTHESIS, ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES, AND REACTION KINETICS
2803
4. Xi, G.L. and Liu, Z.Q., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2013,
vol. 68, no. 10, p. 385. doi 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.06.059
5. Alisi, M.A., Brufani, M., Cazzolla, N., Ceccacci, F.,
Dragone, P., Felici, M., and Leonelli, F., Tetrahedron,
2012, vol. 68, no. 49, p. 10180. doi 10.1016/
j.tet.2012.09.098
6. Sharma, O.P. and Bhat, T.K., Food. Chem., 2009, vol. 113,
no. 4, p. 1202. doi 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.008
7. Jia, Z.S., Zhou, B., Yang, L., Wu, L.M., and Liu, Z.L.,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton. Trans., 1998, vol. 4, no. 4,
p. 911. doi 10.1039/A706691K
8. Kajiyama, T. and Ohkatsu, Y., Polym. Degrad. Stab.,
2001, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 445. doi 10.1016/S0141-3910
(00)00196-8
9. Penketh, G.E, J. Appl. Chem., 2007, vol. 7, no. 9,
p. 512. doi 10.1002/jctb.5010070907
10. Scott, G., Chem. Ind., 1963, no. 7, p. 271.
11. Osorio, M., Aravena, J., Vergara, A., Taborga, L.,
Baeza, E., Catalán, K., and Espinoza, L., Molecules,
2012, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 556. doi 10.3390/
molecules17010556
12. Loshadkin, D., Roginsky, V., and Pliss, E., Int. J. Chem.
Kinet., 2002, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 162. doi 10.1002/kin.10041
13. Bondet, V., Brand-Williams, W., and Berset, C., LWT-
Food. Sci. Technol., 1997, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 609. doi
10.1006/fstl.1997.0240.
14. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E., and Berset, C.L.W.T.,
LWT-Food. Sci. Technol., 1995, vol. 28, no. 95, p. 25.
doi 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
15. Viglianisi, C., Bartolozzi, M.G., Pedulli, G.F., Amorati, R.,
and Menichetti, S., Chem., 2011, vol. 17, no. 44,
p. 12396. doi 10.1002/chem.201101146.
16. Burton, G.W. and Ingold, K.U., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1981, vol. 103, no. 21, p. 6472. doi 10.1021/ja00411a035
17. Bebe, S., Yu, X., Hutchinson, R.A., and Broadbelt, L.,
J. Macromol. Symp., 2006, vol. 243, no. 1, p. 179.
18. Freyaldenhoven, M.A., Lehman, P.A., Franz, T.J.,
Lloyd, R.V., and Samokyszyn, V.M., Chem. Res.
Toxicol., 1998, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 102. doi 10.1021/
tx970044u
19. Kurechi, T. and Kato, T., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1982,
20. Cuvelier, M.E., Thèse en Sciences Alimentaires, ENSIA,
Massy, 1992, p. 64.
21. Russell K.E., J. Phys. Chem.,1954, no. 5, p. 437. doi
10.1021/j150515a014
22. Wang, J., Zhang, H. P., Li, C.Q., Yang, H.J., and
Di, X.H., Fine. Chem. Intermed., 2007, vol. 37, no. 5,
p. 61. doi 1009-9212(2007)05-0061-03
23. Mishra, K., Ojha, H., and Chaudhury, N.K., Good.
Chem., 2012, vol. 130, no. 4, p. 1036. doi 10.1016/
j.foodchem.2011.07.127
24. Villano, D., Fernández-Pachón, M.S., Moyá, M.L.,
Troncoso, A.M., and García-Parrilla, M.C., Talanta,
2007, vol. 71, no. 1, p. 230. doi 10.1016/
j.talanta.2006.03.050
supplied by decomposition of 2,2'-azodi(isobutyro-
nitrile) (AIBN) at 50°C. Briefly, the rate of oxygen
uptake was measured under the oxygen atmosphere in
a closed stainless steel autoclave. AIBN and the syn-
thesized hindered phenol antioxidants were dissolved
directly in toluene. The process of AIBN-induced
peroxidation of styrene was monitored by an oxygen
consumption apparatus equipped with an oxygen
pressure gauge sensitive to oxygen pressure. Styrene in
the toluene solution and antioxidant solution were
poured into a stainless steel autoclave which had been
filled in with dry nitrogen three times and then purged
by oxygen. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at 50°C.
The AIBN solution was injected to the mixture with a
syringe in order to initiate the peroxidation of styrene.
Initial concentrations of AIBN and styrene were 24 mM
and 0.765 M, respectively. All experiment were repeated
not less than three times with the standard deviation
within 10% and the final data were calculated as
average of three independent measurements.
CONCLUSIONS
Four hindered phenol antioxidants with aliphatic
diamines as the bridging groups were synthesized by
acylamidation. Radical scavenging activity of anti-
oxidants was tested by stable DPPH• and inhibiting
AIBN induced oxidation of styrene. The experimental
data indicated that the hindered phenols had high
scavenging ability on the DPPH radical that increased
with increasing concentration of an antioxidant and
decreased with higher length of bridging groups at the
same concentration. The scavenging effect of hindered
phenols on the ROO• radical was opposite to that of
the DPPH radical.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the financial founda-
tion of National Nature Science Foundation of China
(no. 51303020). We are grateful to State Key Lab of
Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, Jilin
University for the characterization work.
REFERENCES
1. Földes, E., Maloschik, E., Kriston, I., Staniek, P., and
Pukánszky, B., Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2006, vol. 91,
no. 3, p. 479. doi 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.03.024
2. Tátraaljai, D., Vámos, M., Orbán-Mester, Á., Staniek, P.,
Földes, E., and Pukánszky, B., Polym. Degrad. Stab.,
2014, vol. 99, no. 13, p. 196. doi 10.1016/
j.polymdegradstab.2013.11.005
3. Liu Z.Q., Chem. Rev., 2010, vol. 110, no. 10, p. 5675.
doi 10.1021/cr900302x
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 86 No. 12 2016