46
V. Alagarsamy et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2007, 340, 41–46
was administered with test compounds intraperitoneally in a
dose of 20 mg/kg. On the fourth day, pylorus was ligated as per
the method of Shay et al. [18]. Animals were fasted for 36 h before
the pylorus ligation procedure. Four hours after the ligation,
animals were sacrificed. The stomach was removed and opened
along with the greater curvature. Ulcer index was determined
by the method of Ganguly and Bhatnagar [19] and recorded in
Table 3.
Biological evaluation
The synthesized compounds were evaluated for analgesic, anti-
inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities and the ulcerogenic
index. Student t-test was performed to ascertain the significance
of all the exhibited activities. The test compounds and the stan-
dard drugs were administered in the form of a suspension (1%
carboxy methyl cellulose as a vehicle) by oral route of adminis-
tration for analgesic and anti-inflammatory but for ulcerogeni-
city studies intraperitoneally as suspension in 10% v/v Tween.
Each group consisted of six animals. The animals were procured
from the Tetrex Biological Center, Madurai, India, and were
maintained in colony cages at 25 l 28C, relative humidity of 45–
55%, under a 12 h light and dark cycle; they were fed standard
animal feed. All the animals were acclimatized for a week before
use. The Institutional Animal Ethics committee approved the
protocol adopted for the experimentation of animals.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the biological activity of the synthesized
compounds on animals was evaluated using a one-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA). In all cases, post-hoc comparisons of the
means of individual groups were performed using Tukey’s test.
A significance level of P a 0.05 denoted significance in all cases.
All values are expressed as mean l SD (standard deviations). For
statistical analysis, we have used GraphPad Prism 3.0 version.
(GraphPad Prism 3.0 version, GraphPad Software, Inc. San Diego,
CA, USA).
Analgesic activity
Test for analgesic activity was performed by Tail-Flick technique
[14, 15] using Wistar albino mice (25–35 gm) of either sex
selected by random sampling technique. Diclofenac sodium at a
dose level of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg was administered orally as
reference drug for comparison. The test compounds at two dose
levels (10, 20 mg/kg) were administered orally. The reaction
time was recorded at 30 min, 1, 2, and 3 h after the treatment,
and cut-off time was 10 sec. The percent analgesic activity (PAA)
was calculated by the following formula:
References
[1] J. R. Vane, R. M. Botting, Inflamm. Res. 1998, 47, 578–587.
[2] J. V. Ryn, G. TrummLitz, M. Pairet, Curr. Med. Chem. 2000,
7, 1145–1161.
[3] J. S. Carter, Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2000, 10, 1011–1020.
[4] M. Beuck, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 631–633.
ꢀ
ꢁ
T2 ꢀ T1
10 ꢀ T1
PAA ¼
6100
[5] V. Alagarsamy, S. Meena, R. Revathi, S. Vijayakumar, K. V.
Ramseshu, Pharmazie 2003, 58, 4–8.
where T1 is the reaction time (s) before treatment, and T2 is the
reaction time (s) after treatment.
[6] V. Alagarsamy, A. T. Thirupathy, S. C. Mandal, S. Rajase-
karan, et al., Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 68, 108–111.
[7] B. M. Srivastava, V. K. Bhalla, T. N. Shankar, Arzneim.
Forsch. 1993, 43, 595–600.
Anti-inflammatory activity
Anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated by carrageenan-
induced paw oedema test in rats [16]. Diclofenac sodium 10,
20 mg/kg was administered as a standard drug for comparison.
The test compounds were administered at two dose levels
(10 mg, 20 mg/kg). The paw volumes were measured using the
mercury displacement technique with the help of a plethysmo-
graph immediately before and 30 min, 1, 2, and 3 h after carra-
geenan injection. The percent inhibition of paw oedema was cal-
culated using the following formula:
[8] A. Hitkari, M. Saxena, A. K. Verma, M. Gupta, M. P. Shan-
kar, Bull. Chim. Farm. 1995, 134, 609–615.
[9] M. K. Ibrahim, Al Azhar, J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 22, 9–12.
[10] V. Alagarsamy, V. Raja salomon, G. Vanikavitha, V. Palu-
chamy, et al., Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 1432–1435.
[11] V. Alagarsamy, G. Murugananthan, R. Venkateshperu-
mal, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 1711–1714.
[12] V. Alagarsamy, R. Rajesh, R. Meena, S. Vijaykumar, et al.,
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 652–656.
Percent inhibition I = 100[1 – (a-x)/(b-y)].
Where x is the mean paw volume of rats before the adminis-
tration of carrageenan and test compounds or reference com-
pound (test group), a is the mean paw volume of rats after the
administration of carrageenan in the test group (drug treated), b
is the mean paw volume of rats after the administration of carra-
geenan in the control group, y is the mean paw volume of rats
before the administration of carrageenan in the control group.
[13] V. Alagarsamy, V. Muthukumar, N. Pavalarani, P.
Vasanthanathan, R. Revathi, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26,
557–559.
[14] S. K. Kulkarni, Life Sci. 1980, 27, 185–188.
[15] R. E. Amour, D. L. Smith, J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1941, 72, 74–
78.
[16] C. A. Winter, E. A. Risely, G. N. Nu, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.
1982, 111, 544–547.
Evaluation of ulcerogenicity index
Ulceration in rats was induced as described by Goyal et al. [17].
Albino rats of wistar strain weighing 150–200 g of either sex
were divided into various groups each of six animals. Control
group of animals were administered only with 10% v/v Tween 80
suspension intraperitoneally. One group was administered with
Aspirin (German Remedies) intraperitoneally in a dose of 20 mg/
kg once daily for three days. The remaining group of animals
[17] R. K. Goyal, A. Chakrabarthi, A. K. Sanyal, Planta Med.
1985, 29, 85–88.
[18] H. Shay, S. A. Komarov, S. E. Fels, D. Meraze, et al., Gastro-
enterology 1945, 5, 43–61.
[19] A. K. Ganguly, O. P. Bhatnagar, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
1973, 51, 748–750.
i 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim