3,5-dihydroxy-1-cyclopentene was the key step in Trost’s
synthesis of 2,3 while Miller employed a Diels-Alder
strategy using a chiral auxiliary4,7 or an enzyme kinetic
resolution8 process to obtain enantiomerically pure 2. To date,
the only asymmetric synthesis of 4-aminocyclopentenone (1,
NAc) is that described by Zwanenburg et al., which involved
the pyrolysis of tricyclic[5.2.1.02,6]decenyl enaminones.9 The
tricyclic decadienone system was prepared in a series of steps
and employed a dynamic kinetic resolution to give enan-
tiopure material.9,10 We describe here a new synthesis of (R)-
(+)-1 that is highlighted by a novel olefin-enone ring-closing
metathesis reaction and utilizes δ-amino â-ketophosphonates,
new sulfinimine-derived chiral building blocks.11
Scheme 2
Initially, we envisioned that (+)-1 could be prepared using
ring-closing olefin metathesis (RCM) with an appropriate
amino ketodiene;12 however, we found only a single example
of RCM leading to a cyclic enone with less than six-
carbons.13 We were also aware that the RCM reaction is
sensitive to the electronic and steric properties of the
alkene,12-14 as well as the substituent on nitrogen,12,15 so we
knew our amino ketodiene synthesis had to be flexible
enough to allow a variety of substituents to be easily installed
in the alkenes and at nitrogen. Sulfinimine-derived δ-amino
â-ketophosphonates appeared to meet these synthetic objec-
tives: diversely substituted sulfinimines are readily avail-
able16 and Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) chemistry
would provide the R,â-unsaturated keto portion (Scheme 2).
Although â-ketophosphonates are well-known, there are
few examples of enantiomerically pure δ-amino â-ketophos-
phonates.17 Nucleophilic ring opening of â-lactams with
methyl phosphonate anions has generally been employed for
the synthesis of enantiomerically pure samples;18,19 however,
this procedure lacks generality, and â-lactams with diverse
functionality are not easily available. We found that the
reaction of sulfinimine-derived â-amino esters20 with lithium
dimethyl methyl phosphonate produced N-sulfinyl δ-amino
â-ketophosphonates in excellent yield. Thus, treatment of
N-sulfinyl â-amino esters (SS,R)-(+)-4 with 5 equiv of
lithium dimethyl methylphosphonate afforded the corre-
sponding N-sulfinyl δ-amino â-ketophosphonates (SS,R)-
(+)-5 in 81-83% isolated yield (Scheme 2). Lesser amounts
of lithium phosphonate resulted in incomplete reaction.
Workup consisted of flash chromatography followed by
Kugelrohr distillation to remove the excess dimethyl meth-
ylphosphonate. Next (+)-5 was treated with 10 equiv of
acetaldehyde followed by DBU to afford the R,â-unsaturated
amino ketone (+)-6 in nearly quantitative yield. The 16.4
Hz coupling constant suggests that (+)-6 has the E geometry.
The â-amino ester (+)-4 was prepared by reaction of the
sulfinimine (S)-(+)-320 with an excess of the sodium enolate
of methyl acetate, as previously described.21
Initial studies aimed at ring closure using RCM were
performed using amino ketodienes (+)-6a (R ) H) and 6b
(R ) Me) with Grubb’s first-generation catalyst I (Scheme
3). With 2-30 mol % catalyst, for up to 40 h in refluxing
DCM, no reaction was observed and starting material was
quantitatively recovered (Table 1, entries 1 and 3). With the
second-generation catalyst II, 6a and 6b gave (+)-9 in 85
and 25% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 2 and 4).
Because we believed that the N-sulfinyl group may be
poisoning the catalyst, 6a and 6b were transformed into N-Ts
derivatives (-)-7a and 7b in 83 and 85% yields, respectively,
by m-CPBA oxidation. The N-Boc derivatives (-)-8 were
also prepared in 85-89% yield by reaction of (+)-6 with
(4) Ghosh, A.; Ritter, A. R.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5808.
(5) Mineno, T.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6591.
(6) Jung, M. E.; Rhee, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4719.
(7) Vogt, P. F.; Hansel, J.-G.; Miller, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
2803.
(8) Mulvihill, M. J.; Gage, J. L.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
3357.
(9) Ramesh, N. G.; Klunder, A. J. H.; Zwanenburg, B. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 3635.
(10) Bakkeren, F. J. A. D.; Ramesh, N. G.; de Goot, D.; Klunder, A. J.
H.; Zwanenburg, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8003.
(11) For leading references to sulfinimine derived chiral building blocks,
see: Davis, F. A.; Rao, A.; Carroll, P. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3855.
(12) For reviews and leading references on ring-closing metathesis, see:
(a) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413. (b) Hanessian,
S.; Margarita, R.; Hall, A.; Johnstone, S.; Tremblay, M.; Parlanti, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13342. (c) Felpin, F.-X.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 3693. (d) Chatterjee, A. K.; Choi, T.-L.; Sanders, D. P.;
Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11360.
(13) Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3783.
(14) Kirkland, T. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7310.
(15) (a) Chippindale, A. M.; Davies, S. G.; Iwamoto, K.; Parkin, R. M.;
Smethurst, C. A. P.; Smith, A. D.; Rodriguez-Solla, H. Tetrahedron 2003,
59, 3253 and references therein. (b) Miller, S. J.; Blackwell, H. E.; Grubbs,
R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9606.
(16) For reviews on the chemistry of sulfinimines, see: (a) Zhou, P.;
Chen, B.-C.; Davis, F. A. In AdVances in Sulfur Chemistry; Rayner, C. M.,
Ed.; JAI Press: Stamford, CT, 2000; Vol. 2, pp 249-282. (b) Davis, F.
A.; Zhou, P.; Chen, B.-C. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 13. (c) Ellman, J. A.;
Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984.
(17) For a review, see: McKenna, C. E.; Kashemirov, B. A. Top. Curr.
Chem. 2002, 220, 201.
(18) (a) Baldwin, J. E.; Adlington, R. M.; Russell, A. T.; Smith, M. L.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 4733. (b) Lee, H. K.; Kim, E.-K.; Pak, C. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9641.
(19) Rudisill, E. E.; Whitten, J. P. Synthesis 1994, 85.
(20) Davis, F. A.; Reddy, R. E.; Szewczyk, J. M.; Reddy, G. V.;
Portonovo, P. S.; Zhang, H.; Fanelli, D.; Reddy, T.; Zhou, P.; Carroll, P. J.
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2555.
(21) Davis, F. A.; Reddy, R. E.; Szewczyk, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 7037.
1270
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 8, 2004