alkenes react with 1O2 via the ene reaction, and mixtures of regio-
isomeric allylic hydroperoxides with a unique product distribution
are obtained.7 This is illustrated by the oxidation of simple acyclic
and cyclic alkyl-substituted alkenes such as 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene
(Entry 2), 2-methyl-2-heptene (Entry 3) and 1-methyl-1-cyclo-
hexene (Entry 4). These substrates typically require 3 to 5 equiv. of
H2O2 to reach complete conversion. Reduction of the allylic
hydroperoxides yields the corresponding allylic alcohols. Although
product mixtures are obtained in most cases, many of these
compounds are difficult to obtain by other synthetic procedures.
This work was supported by the European Commission
(SUSTOX project, G1RD-CT-2000-00347) and the Belgian
Government (IAP project on Supramolecular Chemistry and
Catalysis). JW acknowledges FWO Vlaanderen for a postdoctoral
fellowship.
Notes and references
{ Products were identified by GC-MS, 1H and 13C NMR and by
comparison with authentic samples prepared by photochemical oxidation
in the presence of tetraphenylporphine (chloroform) or rose bengal
(methanol) as photosensitizer. CAUTION: H2O2 and alkyl hydroperoxide
solutions are strongly oxidizing and should be handled with appropriate
precautions.
1
The regioselectivity of the reaction of O2 generated from Mo-
LDH-EG and H2O2 is similar to known solution photochemistry.
For example, 1-methyl-1-cyclohexene gave a hydroperoxide
mixture showing the same product distribution pattern as that
observed for photooxidations.8 Oxyfunctionalized alkenes such as
the monoterpene citronellol (Entry 5) cleanly yield the allylic
hydroperoxide products, no oxidation of the primary alcohol
functionality being observed. Photooxidation of citronellol is the
first step in the preparation of rose oxide, a well-known perfumery
ingredient used in rose and geranium perfumes.9 Reaction in
methanol as the solvent is somewhat slower and slightly less
efficient than in DMF (Entry 6). Using the unmodified Mo-LDH
catalyst instead of Mo-LDH-EG, twice as much H2O2 is required
to reach high conversions (Entry 7). For comparison, the
1 (a) F. van Laar, D. De Vos, D. Vanoppen, B. Sels, P. A. Jacobs,
A. Del Geurzo, F. Pierard and A. Kirsch-De Mesmaeker, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 267; (b) B. F. Sels, D. E. De Vos, P. J. Grobet,
F. Pierard, A. Kirsch-De Mesmaeker and P. A. Jacobs, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 1999, 103, 11114; (c) B. F. Sels, D. E. De Vos, P. J. Grobet and
P. A. Jacobs, Chem.–Eur. J., 2001, 7, 2547; (d) F. M. P. R. van Laar,
D. E. De Vos, F. Pierard, A. Kirsch-De Mesmaeker, L. Fiermans and
P. A. Jacobs, J. Catal., 2001, 197, 139; (e) D. E. De Vos, J. Wahlen,
B. F. Sels and P. A. Jacobs, Synlett, 2002, 367; (f) J. Wahlen, D. E.
De Vos, B. F. Sels, V. Nardello, J.-M. Aubry, P. L. Alsters and
P. A. Jacobs, Appl. Catal., A, 2005, 293, 120.
2 For studies on the quenching of 1O2 by silica gel, see: (a) K.-K. Iu and
J. K. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 3319; (b) E. L. Clennan
and M. F. Chen, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 6004.
3 J. L. Guimara˜es, R. Marangoni, L. P. Ramos and F. Wypych, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 2000, 227, 445.
peroxidation of citronellol in methanol using homogeneous
22
MoO4
requires 4 equiv. of H2O2 for complete conversion,
whereas in DMF, 6 equiv. are required to reach 80% conversion.10
Other heterogeneous catalysts such as La(OH)3 (12 equiv.)11 or
La-zeolites (8 equiv.)12 show far less efficient utilization of H2O2.
For linalool (Entry 8), a monoterpene containing an allylic alcohol
functionality, peroxidation occurs at the isolated, electron-rich 6,7-
double bond. Epoxidation of the less electron-rich, allylic double
bond was not observed. Using 5 equiv. of H2O2, full conversion of
linalool is obtained after 5 h (Entry 9). The derived allylic alcohols
are intermediates for 3,7-dimethyl-1,5,7-octatrien-3-ol, which can
be used as a perfume or flavouring component.13 Next, Mo-LDH-
EG was used for the peroxidation of allylic alcohols to the
corresponding hydroperoxy homoallylic alcohols.14 Mesitylol (4-
methyl-3-penten-2-ol, Entry 10) was selected as a typical allylic
alcohol showing relatively low reactivity towards 1O2. The photo-
oxygenation of mesitylol is the first step in the synthesis of 1,2,4-
trioxanes. Some of these compounds show high antimalarial
activity against Plasmodium falciparum.15 Use of 8 equiv. of H2O2
resulted in 90% conversion. Very high selectivity towards the
hydroperoxy homoallylic alcohols was observed. Notably, almost
no epoxidation of the double bond and no oxidation of the
secondary alcohol group were observed. Using the unmodified
Mo-LDH catalyst, twice as much H2O2 is required to reach similar
conversions in the peroxidation of mesitylol (Entry 11). Moreover,
the hydroperoxide selectivity is rather low due to competitive
epoxidation of the double bond. The stereoselectivities of the
peroxidation catalyzed by Mo-LDH-EG in aqueous DMF are in
accordance with known photochemical oxidations in polar organic
solvents.14 Thus, relatively low diastereoselectivities are observed
due to competitive hydrogen bonding of the allylic alcohol group
with DMF and water, rather than with the attacking 1O2.
4 T. Stanimirova and T. Hibino, Appl. Clay Sci., 2006, 31, 65.
5 For reports on the thermal treatment of aluminium hydroxide in glycols,
see: (a) M. Inoue, Y. Kondo and T. Inui, Chem. Lett., 1986, 1421; (b)
M. Inoue, Y. Kondo and T. Inui, Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 215.
6 The use of glycerol as a swelling agent for the preparation of LDH
intercalates with organic or inorganic anions is well known. For
example, see: (a) E. D. Dimotakis and T. J. Pinnavaia, Inorg. Chem.,
1990, 29, 2393; (b) H. C. B. Hansen and R. M. Taylor, Clay Miner.,
1991, 26, 311.
7 (a) M. Prein and W. Adam, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 477;
(b) E. L. Clennan, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 9151; (c) M. C. DeRosa and
R. J. Crutchley, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 233, 351; (d) J. Wahlen, D. E.
De Vos, P. A. Jacobs and P. L. Alsters, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2004, 346,
152; (e) E. L. Clennan and A. Pace, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 6665.
8 Y. Araki, D. C. Dobrowolski, T. E. Goyne, D. C. Hanson, Z. Q. Jiang,
K. J. Lee and C. S. Foote, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 4570.
9 (a) P. Esser, B. Pohlmann and H.-D. Scharf, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1994, 33, 2009; (b) K. Bauer, D. Garbe and H. Surburg, Common
Fragrance and Flavor Materials – Preparation, Properties and Uses,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997, p. 139; (c) P. Kraft, J. A. Bajgrowicz,
C. Denis and G. Fra´ter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2981.
10 V. Nardello, S. Bogaert, P. L. Alsters and J.-M. Aubry, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2002, 43, 8731.
11 V. Nardello, J. Barbillat, J. Marko, P. T. Witte, P. L. Alsters and
J.-M. Aubry, Chem.–Eur. J., 2003, 9, 435.
12 (a) J. Wahlen, D. De Vos, S. De Hertogh, V. Nardello, J.-M. Aubry,
P. Alsters and P. Jacobs, Chem. Commun., 2005, 927; (b) J. Wahlen,
S. De Hertogh, D. E. De Vos, V. Nardello, S. Bogaert, J.-M. Aubry,
P. L. Alsters and P. A. Jacobs, J. Catal., 2005, 233, 422.
13 G. Ohloff and W. Giersch, CH 596121, 1978.
14 (a) W. Adam and B. Nestler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 6549; (b)
W. Adam and B. Nestler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5041; (c)
W. Adam, H.-G. Bru¨nker, A. S. Kumar, E.-M. Peters, K. Peters,
U. Schneider and H. G. von Schnering, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
1899.
15 (a) A. G. Griesbeck, T. T. El-Idreesy, M. Fiege and R. Brun, Org. Lett.,
2002, 4, 4193; (b) G. Bez, B. Kalita, P. Sarmah, N. C. Barua and
D. K. Dutta, Curr. Org. Chem., 2003, 7, 1231; (c) A. G. Griesbeck,
T. T. El-Idreesy, L.-O. Ho¨inck, J. Lex and R. Brun, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2005, 15, 595.
In conclusion, pretreatment of Mo-LDHs in glycols yields
heterogeneous catalysts showing superior H2O2 efficiency com-
pared to the unmodified materials.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 2333–2335 | 2335