tion level (6.0 M solution), with 3 equiv of the branched
homoallylic alcohol 1a being added slowly to a stirred
solution of 1 equiv of 3-phenylpropanal and 0.1 equiv of
CSA for 120 h (Table 1, entry 8). This superior catalytic
efficiency exhibited by CSA prompted us to select this
Bro¨nsted acid for further explorations.
Scheme 1. Crotyl Transfer Reactions Furnishing Trans Linear
Homoallylic Alcohol
With these optimized conditions, we carried out crotyl
transfer reactions on various aldehydes. While the slightly
bulkier substrate3c (Table 2, entry 4) gave a moderate yield,
the linear ones offered excellent yields (Table 2, entries 2
and 3). Reactions of the dioxygenated substrates (Table 2,
entries 5-7) afforded the desired products with ee up to 99%
displaying the cis olefinic geometries almost predominantly.
This reaction can also be tolerated on other functional
groups. Using cis-hept-4-enal afforded fine yields with
comparable ee and cis olefinic geometry (>99% ee, 84% Z)
(Table 2, entry 8), while the R,â-unsaturated ethyl ester-
of enantiomerically cis linear homoallylic alcohols Z-2
(Scheme 1).
We recognized that if another chiral auxiliary6 can be
judiciously chosen to effectively present a steric environment,
in which the formation of the branched homoallylic alcohols
precursor is highly diastereometrically selective, stereo-
selective access to the linear homoallylic alcohols would be
achieved. It is hence predictable that this crotyl transfer
reaction can provide a valuable platform for the development
of a new highly stereoselective homoallylic alcohol protocol.
This plan was probed by allowing the diastereomic mixture
(syn/anti ) 70/30) of camphor7 branched homoallylic
alcohol, prepared from the addition of crotylmagnesium
bromide to (1R)-(+)-camphor,8 to react with 3-phenyl-
propanal under the catalysis of a series of Bro¨nsted and Lewis
acids. In accordance with the recent surge in interest in metal
triflates, indium(III) triflate has emerged as a promising
choice particularly in our research group.9 However, no
desired product was obtained for this crotyl transfer reaction
when In(OTf)3 was employed as the acid catalyst (Table 1,
entry 1).
Table 2. Catalyzed Allyl Transfer Reaction from 1a to Various
Aldehydes 3a,b
time yieldc
entry
3
(h)
(%)
% ee (% Z)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PhCH2CH2CHO
n-C5H11CHO
n-C8H17CHO
120 88
144 68
144 95
144 40
120 74
96 94
96 80
96 83
240 66
240 trace
240 trace
94 (99)d,g,h
97 (>99)f
90 (94)f
Optimal results were obtained when the reaction was
carried out at ambient temperature and at a higher concentra-
c-C6H11CHO
92 (96)e
BnO(CH2)2CHO
BnO(CH2)3CHO
BnO(CH2)4CHO
CH3CH2CHdCH(CH2)2CHO
EtO2CCHdCH(CH2)3CHO
PhCHO
97 (>99)d
99 (>99)d
98 (98)d
>99 (84)f
98 (99)f
Table 1. Allyl Transfera from 1ab to 3-Phenylpropanal with
Various Acids
10
11
2-NO2PhCHO
a Reactions were performed with branched homoallylic alcohol 1a (0.913
mmol), 2 (0.304 mmol), and CSA (0.03 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.1 mL), unless
otherwise stated. b Branched homoallylic alcohol used has a syn/anti ratio
of 70/30. c Combined yield based on 2. d Determined by chiral HPLC.
e Determined by HPLC of the 2,4-dinitrobenzoyl derivative. f Determined
by HPLC of the Mosher derivative. g Absolute stereochemistry was
determined by comparison with literature values. h Reactions of the (1S)-
(-)-camphor branched homoallylic alcohol with 2 furnished the other
enantiomer (60% yield; 93% ee; 99% Z).
entry
acid
T (°C)
time (h)
yield (%)
% ee (Z:E)
1c
2
3
4
5
6
7
8d
In(OTf)3
pTSA
TFA
CSA
CSA
CSA
Br-CSA
CSA
25
25
25
25
0
-78
25
25
18
18
18
18
18
10
120
120
<7
<7
25
20
15
77
88
96 (95:5)
94 (94:6)
93 (94:6)
93 (97:3)
93 (97:3)
95 (99:1)
94 (99:1)
type aldehyde needed a longer time to be depleted before
moderate yields were achieved with admirable ee and cis
olefinic geometry (>99% ee, 97% Z) (Table 2, entry 9). On
a Reactions were performed with branched homoallylic alcohol 1a (0.5
mmol), aldehyde (0.75 mmol), and acid (0.05 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL),
unless otherwise stated. b Branched homoallylic alcohol is synthesized by
Grignard reaction with a yield of 87% (syn:anti ) 70:30). c Desired product
not formed. d Reactions were performed with branched homoallylic alcohol
1a (0.913 mmol), aldehyde (0.304 mmol), and acid (0.03 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(0.1 mL).
(6) For an extensive list of chiral auxiliaries, see: (a) Rahmen, A. U.;
Shah, A. StereoselectiVe Synthesis in Organic Cheimstry; Springer: Berlin,
1993. (b) Seyden-Penne, I. Chiral Auxiliaries and Ligands in Asymmetric
Synthesis; Wiley: New York, 1995. (c) Ager, D. J.; Prakash, J.; Schaad,
D. R. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 835.
(7) For a review on camphor-based chiral auxiliaries, see: Oppolzer,
W. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 1969.
(8) Dimitrov, V.; Simova, S.; Kostova, K. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 1699.
1282
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 8, 2004