H.-Y. Yang et al. / Dyes and Pigments 136 (2017) 224e228
225
monomeric A
nents to form A
b
40 and A
b
42 peptides, which are the main compo-
a
400
300
200
100
400
300
200
100
b
fibrils, largely enhanced their fluorescence in a
YHY1
YHY1
concentration-dependent manner. We observed that the fluores-
cence enhancement of the D-A-D YHY2 (Fig. 1b) was stronger than
that of the D-A YHY1 (Fig. 1a) with both A
b
40 and A
b42. Both the
limit of detection (3 /k) and binding constant (Kd) of YHY2 for A
s
b42
were determined to be lower than that of YHY1 (Fig. S1 and
Table 1). The fluorescence enhancement is in agreement with the
property of similar types of DCM probes with a typical pull-push
motif, which is sensitive to the change of external environment
from hydrophilic to hydrophobic [17]. Next, we tested the binding
specificity of YHY2 with different fragments of A
fragments the probe showed the strongest affinity to A
major neurotoxic domain that impairs learning and memory in
Aβ(1-42)
Aβ(1-40)
0
0
560
640
720
800
560
640
720
800
b
. Of a range of
(25e35), a
b
400
400
b
YHY2
YHY2
300
200
100
0
300
200
100
0
rodents (Fig. 1c) [18]. This suggests that this specific fragment
might be a major (but not necessarily the sole) pocket of Ab for
YHY2 to bind, though more evidence is needed to scrutinize the
probe-peptide binding mode. A summary of the binding properties
Aβ(1-42)
Aβ(1-40)
of YHY1 and YHY2 to A
The pH working range of YHY1 and YHY2 in the absence and
presence of A peptides was tested, and the results suggest that the
b42 monomer is shown in Table 1.
b
sensitivity of probe was not compromised over a wide range of pH
(3e10) (Fig. S2). We also determined that the association of YHY2
560
640
720
800
560
640
720
800
Wavelength (nm)
Wavelength (nm)
with A
(Congo red, a known staining reagent for A
probe showed a larger fluorescence enhancement for A
b
42 is reversible in the presence of a competing species
) (Fig. S3a), and that the
42 fibril
c
b
2.4
1.6
0.8
0.0
2.4
1.6
0.8
0.0
YHY1
YHY2
b
(by incubating the monomer in a Tris-HCl buffer for seven days, pH
8.0, room temperature) [19] than monomers (Fig. S3b). A fluores-
cence kinetic study indicated that the fluorescence enhancement of
YHY2 quickly reached equilibrium (within 2 min) with Ab in its
various morphological forms including fibril, oligomer (by incu-
bating the monomer in a Tris-HCl buffer for three days, pH 8.0,
room temperature [19]) and monomer (Fig. 2). To test the imaging
ability of the D-A-D probe for A
confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used. Shown in
Fig. 3 are the CLSM images of A upon fibrogenesis with increasing
time. The results suggest that the gradual morphological change of
with time could be tangibly imaged by YHY2. Transmission
electron microscopy performed corroborated the morphology of
the different A species formed (Fig. 4).
With the promising properties of YHY2 determined, we tested
its ability for imaging A senile plaques using a transgenic mouse
b with different morphologies,
b
A
b
Fig. 1. Fluorescence titration of YHY1 and YHY2 (10
(a) A (1e40) (0e200 M) and (b) A (1e42) (0e200
ment of YHY1 and YHY2 (10 M) in the presence of different fragments of A
where I0 and I are the fluorescence intensity (IF) of probe in the absence and presence
of a peptide, respectively. All measurements were carried out in phosphate buffered
saline (0.01 M, pH 7.4, 20% DMSO) with excitation of 480 nm for both YHY1 and YHY2.
m
M) in the presence of increasing
M). (c) Fluorescence enhance-
(200 M),
b
b
m
b
m
m
b
m
b
with APPswe/PS 1dE9 mutations (APP/PS1 mouse) [20]. An in vitro
assay first showed that the senile deposits of the brain section
removed from APP/PS1 mouse could be imaged by YHY2, and the
fluorescent spots overlapped well with those produced by thio-
imaging (Fig. S4).
flavin S, a known Ab plaque staining agent (Fig. 5). We also deter-
mined that the probe was not toxic to a mouse fibroblast (NIH/3T3)
cell line with a concertation 10-fold higher than that used for
Eventually we examined the in vivo imaging ability of the probe
using a wild-type mouse as control. The results obtained from two
independent groups suggest that intravenous injection of YHY2
produced strong fluorescence of the probe in the brain of both mice
within 5 min, but the fluorescence quickly diminished in the con-
trol mice at 10 min. In contrast, the fluorescence of the D-A-D probe
retained significantly in the APP/PS1 mouse, but was faded at
15 min (Fig. 6). A following ex vivo assay on the mice brain taken
from above in vivo study showed that the probe could fluorescently
label the amyloid deposits in the cortex and hippocampus regions
of the brain of APP/PS1 mouse, whereas no such staining was
observed in the age-matched wild type control group (Fig. 7). The
ex vivo staining result was in good agreement with that produced
by the in vitro staining (Fig. 5). These pieces of data suggest that the
1
+
2
YHY1 (D-A)
probe could cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to stain Ab senile
plaques formed in transgenic live mice, and that it can be quickly
removed from the brain. To further corroborate that the BBB
permeability of the probe, the brain section of a normal mouse
YHY2 (D-A-D)
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: Piperidine and 1-propanol (molar ratio of 1 to
2 ¼ 1:1 and 1:2 for YHY1 and YHY2, respectively).