F. Li et al.
Carbohydrate Polymers 251 (2021) 117090
Table 2
Methylation analysis data for SLWPP-3.
Retention time
Methylated sugars
Mass fragments (m/z)
Molar ratio
Type of linkages
9.739
2,3,5-Me3-Araf
2,3-Me2-Araf
43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161
4.3
Araf-(1→
15.005
17.692
19.035
20.926
21.457
29.669
43,71,87,99,101,117,129,161,189
43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161,205
43,87,101,117,129,143,159,189
43,87,99,101,117,129,161,173,233
43,87,99,101,113,117,129,131,161,173,233
43,87,117,129,159,189,233
12.8
5.56
4.61
14.3
52.87
4.96
→5)-Araf-(1→
Galp-(1→
2,3,4,6-Me4-Galp
3-Me1-Rhap
→2,4)-Rhap-(1→
→3)-Galp-(1→
→4)-GalpAa /Galp-(1→
→3,6)-Galp-(1→
2,4,6-Me3-Galp
2,3,6-Me3-Galp
2,4-Me2-Galp
a
Dominate percentage in the mixture of 4-GalpA and 4-Galp.
3.76 ppm, and 3.65 ppm, respectively, based on the adjacent correlation
in the COSY spectrum (Fig. 3D), and the corresponding carbon signals
obtained using the HSQC spectrum (Fig. 3C) were δ 82.69 ppm, 77.90
ppm, 85.34 ppm, and 62.60 ppm for C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5, respectively.
In addition, the complete 1H and 13C chemical shifts of residue D were
consistent with the literature (Li et al., 2020), confirming that residue D
A, O-1 of residue E was linked to C-3 of residue J, and O-4 of residue B
was linked to C-1 of residue C, respectively. Hence, a hypothetical
structure for SLWPP-3 was proposed as Fig. 3F, considering the
comprehensive results of monosaccharide compositions, methylation
analysis, and NMR analyses.
was α-L-Araf-(1→.
3.2. Antioxidant activities of SLWPP-3 in vitro
The anomeric proton and carbon shifts at δ 4.47/104.85 ppm in the
HSQC spectroscopy were attributed to H-1 and C-1, indicating that
residue E was a β-configuration residue. Based on the COSY spectrum
(Fig. 3D), the chemical shifts of H-2 to H-6a/b were determined, and the
corresponding carbon signals was obtained from the HSQC spectrum
(Fig. 3C). The complete 1H and 13C chemical shifts for residues E and J
were shown in Table 3. Based on the literature (Li et al., 2020), the
proosed unit of residues E and J were →3,6)-β-D-Galp-(1→ and
→3)-β-D-Galp-(1→, respectively.
In this study, the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging capacities of
SLWPP-3, macromolecular crude polysaccharide and a positive control
(Vc) were investigated and the results are shown in Fig. 4.
All tested samples exhibited a concentration-dependent relationship
within the tested dosage range (0.2–1.0 mg/mL), and SLWPP-3
(17.5–43.7 %) displayed significantly stronger inhibitory effects than
the macromolecular crude polysaccharide (1.1–26.7 %), which was
significantly lower than the positive control acarbose (77.27–94.30 %)
as shown in Fig. 4. Furthermore, Wang, Liu et al. (2017) isolated a
polysaccharide with an average molecular mass of 21,100 Da from
Cucurbita moschata seeds with an inhibitory rate of 26.3 % at 1.0 mg/mL,
which was weaker than SLWPP-3 (43.7 %) at the same mass. As shown
in Fig. 4B, when the tested dosages were between 0.2 mg/mL and 1.0
mg/mL, the scavenging activities of all tested samples were
dose-dependent, and the SLWPP-3 scavenging rate (13.2–26.5 %)
increased more rapidly than did that of the macromolecular crude
polysaccharide (4–11.6 %), but showed a dramatically flat trend
compared with the Vc (66.4–92.8 %). The results of the two assays
revealed that SLWPP-3 exhibited better antioxidant potential compared
with the macromolecular polysaccharide at the same mass, which may
be associated with the SLWPP-3 molecular mass, including more
reducing terminal ends per unit mass for its low molecular mass (Yuan
et al., 2020).
The anomeric proton and carbon signals at δ 5.01/108.79 ppm were
described as H-1 and C-1, inferring residue F was the α-configuration
residue. All the chemical shifts from H-2 to H-6a were obtained from the
COSY spectrum (Fig. 3D), including H-2 (δ 3.93 ppm), H-3 (δ 3.83 ppm),
H-4 (δ 4.04 ppm), H-5 (δ 4.22 ppm), and H-6a (δ 4.29 ppm). Further-
more, the matching 13C chemical shifts were C-2 (δ 80.38 ppm), C-3 (δ
76.41 ppm), C-4 (δ 82.29 ppm), and C-5 (δ 66.93 ppm) in the HSQC
spectrum (Fig. 3C). The complete 1H and 13C chemical shifts for residue
F were consistent with the literature (Qin et al., 2019) and the downfield
shift in the C-5 of residue F at δ 80.14 ppm indicated that residue F was
→5)-
The cross peak at δ 1.19/16.79 ppm in the HSQC spectrum (Fig. 3C)
corresponds to H6/C6 (methyl group) of →2,4)- -L-Rhap-(1→. The cross
peaks at δ 5.24/93.56, 4.88/100.74 ppm (Fig. 3C) assigned as to H1/C1
of →4)- -D-Glcp, and -D-Galp-(1→, respectively. The complete proton
α-L-Araf-(1→.
α
α
α
chemical shifts of G, H, and I were obtained from the COSY (Fig. 3D)
spectrum, and the corresponding 13C signals were identified in the HSQC
spectrum (Fig. 3C). Their all signals were assigned by comparison with
the literature (Qin et al., 2019; Wu, Luo, Yao, & Yu, 2020). The NMR
data were summarized in Table 3.
3.3. Results of
α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition activities
The major strategy for decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia was
the inhibition of carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes such as α-glucosi-
The glycosidic linkage sequence determined among the SLWPP-3
residues based on the correlation peaks obtained in the HMBC spec-
trum (Fig. 3E). As observed, the correlation peak between residue F (H-
5) and residue D (C-1) at δ 4.22/110.71 ppm indicated the presence of
dase and a-amylase (Zhang, Zhao, Shang, Guo, & Chen, 2020). There-
fore, the inhibitory activities of SLWPP-3 and macromolecular crude
polysaccharide against α-glucosidase and α-amylase were evaluated in
vitro to determine their hypoglycemic properties. As shown in Fig. 5A,
all tested samples displayed inhibitory activity against -glucosidase in a
α
-L-Araf-(1→5)-α-L-Araf-(1→. Similarly, the cross-peaks at δ 5.01/80.38
α
ppm (FH-1/EC-3), 4.47/79.94 ppm (EH-1/AC-4; JH-1/AC-4), δ 5.01/
80.05 ppm (AH-1/CC-4), δ 5.07/69.17 ppm (CH-1/EC-6), δ 4.95/69.17
ppm (GH-1/EC-6), δ 5.01/66.93 ppm (FH-1/FC-5), δ 4.88/66.93 ppm
(IH-1/FC-5), δ 5.01/77.99 ppm (FH-1/GC-4), δ 5.07/79.94 ppm (CH-1/
AC-4), δ 101.08/4.16 ppm (CC-1/BH-4), δ 4.47/82.29 ppm, (EH-1/JC-
3), and δ 101.08/3.48 ppm (CC-1/HH-4) showed O-5 of residue E was
linked to C-1 of residue D, O-1 of residue F was linked to C-3 of residue E,
O-1 of residue E was linked to C-4 of residue A, O-1 of residue J was
linked to C-4 of residue A, O-1 of residue A was linked to C-4 of residue
C, O-1 of residue C was linked to C-6 of residue E, O-1 of residue G was
linked to C-6 of residue E, O-1 of residue F was linked to C-5 of residue F,
O-1 of residue I was linked to C-5 of residue F, O-1 of residue F was
linked to C-4 of residue G, O-1 of residue C was linked to C-4 of residue
dose-dependent manner; however, the positive control, acarbose,
showed significantly better inhibitory ability than SLWPP-3 and the
macromolecular crude polysaccharide. The inhibitory capacities of
SLWPP-3 and the macromolecular crude polysaccharide were 17.8 %
and 11.7 %, respectively, at a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL, which was
higher than SCP, a polysaccharide isolated from sweet corncobs that
exhibited inhibitory rates of 10.5 % at 6 mg/mL (Ma, Wang, Gao, &
Zhang, 2016)). The results showed that the inhibitory effects on
α
-glucosidase were in the decreasing order of SLWPP-3 > macromo-
lecular crude polysaccharide > SCP.
The α-amylase inhibitory rates of SLWPP-3, macromolecular crude
polysaccharide, and the positive control (acarbose) in the 0.2–2.0 mg/
mL range are shown in Fig. 5B. The inhibitory effects of the tested
6