C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
steadily increased over a time period of 35 min (Figure 3A). The
immobilized species was identified as GST-GEhAGT as it was
recognized by anti-GST antibody on the chip (Figure 3A). Im-
mobilization was specific because preincubation of the E. coli
extract with BG (100 µM) decreased the SPR signal by a factor of
50 (Figure 3A). Furthermore, no signal was observed from extracts
of E. coli expressing only GST without the attached hATG
(Supporting Information).
The results demonstrate a number of major advantages of the
hAGT-mediated immobilization procedure. (1) The attachment to
the surface is very gentle, and the fusion protein is exclusively
coupled via the hAGT moiety, leaving the protein of interest
accessible for interactions with other molecules. (2) The attachment
to the surface is covalent. This ensures that the protein remains
linked to the solid phase under a variety of different conditions.
(3) The immobilization on BG-covered surfaces is specific, enabling
the immobilization of hAGT fusion proteins without time-consum-
ing purification steps. BG shows no significant reactivity against
proteins other than hAGT. This makes it superior to the suicide
inhibitor 4-nitrophenyl phosphonate as an immobilization device,
because 4-nitrophenyl phosphonates are known to react with a
variety of proteases, lipases, and esterases.2d,8 (4) hAGT as a fusion
tag can be used both for the covalent immobilization and the
attachment of a variety of chemical or spectroscopic probes.4 This
versatility makes possible the use of once constructed hAGT fusion
proteins for very different investigations. All features combined
should establish hAGT fusions as unique tools in functional
proteomics.
Figure 3. Immobilization of hAGT fusion proteins out of cell extracts.
(A) SPR data for the immobilization of GST-GEhAGT on BG-covered sensor
chips out of cell extracts. HBS: 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl,
1% Tween 20. (1) Lysate (10 mg/mL total protein); (2) lysate (10 mg/mL
total protein) preincubated with BG (100 µM); (3) anti-GST antibody (0.1
mg/mL) after incubation of a chip with cell extract as in lane 1. (B) Lane
1: SDS-PAGE of cell extract of Xl1-Blue expressing GST-GEhAGT used
in (A) and subsequent staining with Coomassie Blue.
as calculated from the measured resonance units, decreased with
increasing surface density of immobilized GST-GEhAGT. GST-
GEhAGT densities as low as 0.7 ng/mm2 gave a 1:1 ratio of antibody
bound per GST-GEhAGT, whereas the ratio decreased to 1:6 at
densities of 17 ng/mm2. The density of the immobilized hAGT
fusion protein can be readily adjusted by controlling the reaction
time on the chip. Furthermore, chips covered with GST-GEhAGT
and anti-GST antibody were flushed with 10 mM HCl to remove
any noncovalently bound protein. Subsequent application of new
anti-GST antibody to this chip resulted again in a specific binding
signal, indicating that most of the immobilized GST-GEhAGT is
indeed covalently bound (Supporting Information). The intensity
of this signal was decreased by 30% as compared to the first
incubation with antibody. The observed decrease in the binding of
antibody after the HCl washing can be explained in two ways: (i)
GST forms a dimer, and not necessarily both halves of a GST-
GEhAGT dimer are covalently bound to the sensor chip; (ii) the
treatment with 10 mM HCl might denature a fraction of the GST,
thereby reducing the subsequent binding of the antibody.
To demonstrate that the hAGT-based immobilization does not
interfere with the biological activity of the protein of interest, we
measured the GST activity of GST-GEhAGT after its immobilization.
GST-GEhAGT was immobilized on agarose beads displaying 1, and
GST activity was measured by incubating the beads with glutathione
and 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB). GST catalyzes the ad-
dition of glutathione to CDNB, a reaction that can be followed at
345 nm.7 Incubating agarose beads displaying immobilized GST-
GEhAGT with a solution of glutathione and CDNB led to rapid
product formation, while agarose beads displaying no GST-GEhAGT
showed no such activity, demonstrating that GST-GEhAGT at least
partially retains its activity after immobilization (Supporting
Information).
Acknowledgment. This work was financed by the Swiss
National Science Foundation, the Bundesamt fuer Berufsbildung
und Technologie (CTI project 6255.1), and the Bundesamt fuer
Bildung und Wissenschaft (project X-TB). We thank Christoph
Bieri, Kirstin Leufgen, and Horst Vogel for advice and support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) For recent reviews: (a) Wilson, D. S.; Nock, S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2002, 6, 81-85. (b) MacBeath, G. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32 Suppl 2, 526-
532.
(2) For recent examples: (a) Lee, K. B.; Park, S. J.; Mirkin, C. A.; Smith, J.
C.; Mrksich, M. Science 2002, 295, 1702-1705. (b) MacBeath, G.;
Schreiber, S. L. Science (Washington, D. C.) 2000, 289, 1760-1763. (c)
Zhu, H.; Bilgin, M.; Bangham, R.; Hall, D.; Casamayor, A.; Bertone, P.;
Lan, N.; Jansen, R.; Bidlingmaier, S.; Houfek, T.; Mitchell, T.; Miller,
P.; Dean, R. A.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. Science 2001, 293, 2101-
2105. (d) Hodneland, C. D.; Lee, Y. S.; Min, D. H.; Mrksich, M. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5048-5052. (e) Lesaicherre, M. L.; Lue,
R. Y.; Chen, G. Y.; Zhu, Q.; Yao, S. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
8768-8769.
(3) Pegg, A. E. Mutat. Res. 2000, 462, 83-100.
(4) Keppler, A.; Gendreizig, S.; Gronemeyer, T.; Pick, H.; Vogel, H.;
Johnsson, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 86-89.
hAGT possesses a high activity against a substrate that is
otherwise chemically inert. To demonstrate that this feature can be
exploited to specifically immobilize hAGT fusion proteins directly
from crude protein preparations, GST-GEhAGT was immobilized
directly out of cell extracts of E. coli XL1-Blue expressing GST-
GEhAGT (Figure 3).
(5) GEhAGT possesses the mutations Asn157Gly and Ser159Glu: Juillerat,
A.; Gronemeyer, T.; Keppler, A.; Gendreizig, S.; Pick, H.; Vogel, H.;
Johnsson, K. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 313-317.
(6) Chips were purchased from Biacore (CM5-research grade).
(7) Habig, W. H.; Pabst, M. J.; Jakoby, W. B. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249,
7130-7139.
(8) (a) Becker, E. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1967, 147, 289-296. (b)
Bjorkling, F.; Dahl, A.; Patkar, S.; Zundel, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994,
2, 697-702.
E. coli lysates were applied to a BG-covered sensor chip, and a
strong signal from irreversibly bound protein was observed that
JA034145S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 26, 2003 7811