monoprotected resorcinols, which we prepare using o-
quinone methide chemistry developed in our group.19
Our synthesis of these substrates begins with bromination20
of the aldehyde 1 and subsequent bis-BOC protection, which
affords the bromo aldehyde 2 in greater than 70% yield
(Scheme 2). Reduction of the aldehyde 2 with NaBH4
Hydrogenation of p-quinol (+)-14 over rhodium (Rh/Al,
150 psi H2, THF) chemoselectively reduces the enone
functionality and affords the vinylogous ester (+)-20 in 70%
yield (Scheme 3). Subsequent hydrogenolysis of the bromine
Scheme 3. Cleavage of Directing Group
Scheme 2. Preparation of Resorcinol Precursors
atom and hydrogenation of the vinylogous ester in (+)-20
is accomplished with Pd/C (1 atm, 1.0 equiv of Hu¨nig’s base,
0.1 M EtOAc) and affords the lactone (+)-19 in quantitative
yield. The relative stereochemistry of the protons (Ha-Hd)
in (+)-19 was established by 2D-NOESY experiment. In our
experience, a two-step reduction protocol is preferred to a
single-pot reduction of (+)-13 with PtO2 (4 h, 1 atm H2)
because the yields of the latter procedure prove quite variable
(40-80%) and afford significant quantities of rearomatized
materials. Addition of solid KOTMS to (+)-19 (1.1 equiv,
0.1 M Et2O, rt) affords the enantiomerically enriched ketone
(+)-21 in >95% yield. Comparison with a racemic standard
by chiral GC analysis demonstrated that (+)-20 is obtained
in >99% ee by this eight-pot process. It should be noted
that â-elimination, which is necessary for formation of the
enone (+)-21, most likely does not occur until the lactone
undergoes ring opening and a subsequent ring-flip.
With regard to the diastereoselectivity of this process, it
appears that the major isomer arises from the boat transition
state B, while the chair transition state A leads to the minor
diastereomer (Figure 2). The boat transition state is not
objectionable because most sites in the forming and neigh-
boring six-membered ring are sp2 hybridized. The Weinreb
amide affords much higher diastereoselectivity than other
amides. Presumably, there is less steric interaction between
the -OMe and -Br in the Weinreb amide than the
corresponding interaction between an alkyl and -Br sub-
stituent in other amides in the transition state. The >25%
improvement in yields and reproducibility in this dearoma-
tization process as compared with earlier des-bromo des-
methyl examples18a can be attributed to a favorable steric
interaction that facilitates lactonization, as well as prevention
of undesired aryl couplings with the oxidant.18a,22 It appears
that a C2 substituent, such as bromine, limits the degrees of
provides the corresponding benzyl alcohol, which upon
treatment with an excess of a nucleophile generates an
o-quinone methide. A conjugate addition ensues and provides
the monoprotected 4-alkylated resorcinol derivatives 3-7 in
good yields (59-89%). These phenols undergo Mitsunobu
coupling with 2S-hydroxy-N-methoxy-N-methylpropiona-
mide (-)-821 and thereby afford phenols (9-13) upon
deprotection with ZnBr2 (4 equiv, 0.1 M in CH3NO2) in
>75% yield over the three steps.
As shown in Table 1, exposure of these readily prepared
chiral resorcinols (9-13) to 1.1 equiv of PhI(OCOCF3)2 (0.3
h, 0.1 M CH2Cl2:CH3NO2/1:2.5, 0 °C) followed by an
aqueous workup affords a series of chiral lactone scaffolds
(14-18) in good yields with excellent diastereoselectivity.
Because the protocol proves diastereoselective with a variety
of differently sized C4-substituents, the magnitude of asym-
metric induction afforded by the chiral amide appears
independent of the steric bulk of the C-4 substituent.
(17) Imbos, R.; Brilman, M. H. G.; Pineschi, M.; Feringa, B. L. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 623-625.
(18) (a) Van De Water, R. W.; Hoarau, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 5109-5113. (b) Pettus, L. H.; Van De Water, R. W.; Pettus,
T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 905-908.
(19) (a) Van De Water, R. W.; Magdziak, D. J.; Chau, J. N.; Pettus, T.
R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6502-6503. (b) Jones, R.; Van De
Water, R. W.; Lindsey, C.; Hoarau, C.; Ung; T.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 3435-3441. (c) Hoarau, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. Synlett 2003,
127. (d) Tuttle, K.; Pettus, T. R. R. Synlett 2003, 2234-2236. (e) Lindsey,
C.; Gomez-Diaz, C.; Villalba, J. M.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron 2002,
58, 4559-4565.
(20) Bui, E.; Bayle, J. P.; Perez, F.; Liebert, L.; Courtieu, J. Liquid
Crystals 1990, 8, 513-526.
(21) (a) Paterson, I.; Wallace, D. J.; Cowden, C. J. Synthesis 1998, 639-
652. (b) Less, S. L.; Leadlay, P. F.; Dutton, C. J.; Staunton, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 3519-3520.
(22) Murakata, M.; Yamada, K.; Hoshino, O. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1994, 443-445.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 10, 2004
1537