Scheme 1. Proposed Synthetic Route
protocols retains all of the benefits of bead-based chemistry
but offers a number of practical advantages. For example,
the internal structure of a monolith is found to have im-
proved flow characteristics when compared to traditional
polymer beads, allowing more efficient and higher-yielding
syntheses to be conducted.7 When the polymer is contained
within a column, the flow stream is forced to pass through the
monolith, whereas polymer beads are commonly observed to
suffer from solution channelling which reduces their effec-
tiveness. In addition, the rigid cross-linked morphology of
the monolith prevents significant volume changes due to
swelling or shrinking, allowing the use of a wider range of
solvents. Of particular importance from a synthetic point of
view is the possibility to rapidly generate customized func-
tionalized monoliths without recourse to the specialist equip-
ment that is required for the manufacture of bead-type
reagents, and thus they can be prepared at a much lower
cost. Indeed, monolithic reactors have already been prepared
and used to conduct a wide range of chemistries, having
demonstated particular value as reagent sources for flow
chemistry platforms.7ꢀ9
generate suitable monoliths of form M1, possessing high
porosity to reduce back-pressure and high stability to with-
stand prolonged processing under the flow conditions. The
optimized blend required a significant deviation from pre-
vious recipes,7,9 incorporating water and a low molecular
weight alcohol to accommodate the different solubility
characteristics of the hydrochloride monomer salt 3 and
the divinyl benzene cross-linker (Scheme 2). It should also
be noted that polymerization of this material to form gel-
phase beads would be difficult, since compound 3 is mainly
water-soluble and thus the usual biphasic solvent system
would be inappropriate.
Scheme 2. Preparation of the Functionalized Monolith M112
Aminopyrimidines related to 1 have been used previously
as targets for solid-supported synthesis10 due to their sig-
nificant value as building blocks. Here we propose a simple
sequence to prepare structures related to 1 (Scheme 1) which
we anticipated could be readily applied using solid-phase
monolithic reagents and flow chemistry techniques.11
Therefore, an investigation was first conducted to identify
a polymerization mixture that could be used to reproducibly
For the monolith preparation, the monomer, cross-
linker, and porogen mixture were homogenized under
gentle heating (<50 °C).12 The initiator was then added,
and the resulting mixture was transferred into glass
columns.13 The columns were sealed at both ends and
heated at 90 °C for 20 h in a multichannel convection
heater (Figure 1a). After cooling, the monoliths were
washed with ethanol at 60 °C to remove the porogen and
residual monomer, resulting in rigid white monoliths (M1)
that completely filled the glass columns (Figure 1b).
(7) Baumann, M.; Baxendale, I. R.; Ley, S. V.; Nikbin, N.; Smith,
C. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1587.
The monoliths could be prepared in a range of sizes,
allowing for small-scale monolithic reactors (3 mm column
diameter) for use with precious materials, or parallel use of
multiple columns with 15 mm diameter, currently the largest
diameter at which the temperature gradient across the col-
umn allows effective polymerization.7 The monoliths used in
this work had an average dry weight of 1.6 g (column size
7 cm ꢁ10 mm diameter), and elemental analysis indicated a
loading of 2.4 mmol/g isothiouronium chloride which was
(8) (a) Burguete, M. I.; Garcıa-Verdugo, E.; Karbass, N.; Luis, S. V.;
Sans, V.; Sokolova, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 1991. (b) Burguete,
M. I.; Cornejo, A.; Garcıa-Verdugo, E.; Gil, M. J.; Luis, S. V.; Mayoral,
J. A.; Martınez-Merino, V.; Sokolova, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4344.
(c) Mennecke, K.; Kirschning, A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5, 21.
(d) Mennecke, K.; Cecilia, R.; Glasnov, T. N.; Gruhl, S.; Vogt, C.;
Feldhoff, A.; Vargas, M. A. L.; Kappe, C. O.; Kunz, U.; Kirschning, A.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 717.
(9) (a) Smith, C. J.; Smith, C. D.; Nikbin, N.; Ley, S. V.; Baxendale,
I. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1927. (b) Lange, H.; Capener, M.;
Jones, A.; Smith, C.; Nikbin, N.; Baxendale, I.; Ley, S. Synlett 2011,
2011, 869. (c) Nikbin, N.; Ladlow, M.; Ley, S. V. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2007, 11, 458. (d) Roper, K. A.; Lange, H.; Polyzos, A.; Berry, M. B.;
Baxendale, I. R.; Ley, S. V. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1648.
(10) Masquelin, T.; Sprenger, D.; Baer, R.; Gerber, F.; Mercadal, Y.
Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 646.
(11) All flow reactions and monolith preparations described below
were carried out using Vapourtec R2þ and R4 units, available from
can be telescoped by sending a programmed sequence of commands to
the serial interface of the flow apparatus. For the first use of the
Vapourtec system within our group, see: Baumann, M.; Baxendale,
I. R.; Ley, S. V.; Smith, C. D.; Tranmer, G. K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5231.
(12) The optimized polymerization mixture developed for this work
consisted of the following: 4-(vinylbenzyl)isothiuronium chloride (3;
18.8% w/w); divinyl benzene (DVB cross-linker; 12.5% w/w); 1-propa-
nol (porogen; 57.5% w/w); water (porogen; 10.9% w/w); 1,10-azobis-
(cyclohexane carbonitrile) (ACHC initiator; 1% w/w relative to 3 þ
DVB).
(13) Commercially available Omnifit glass chromatography columns
with fixed end pieces, with 10 mm bore and 100 mm length. Website:
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 15, 2012
3921