Green Chemistry
Paper
1.8 × 10−4 mol L−1 and 1.73 × 10−3 mol L−1 and 1.65 × 10−4 Jain for help and technical discussions. D. S. thanks the
mol L−1 respectively in an aqueous solution of 1 mg mL−1 con- MHRD, New Delhi for her fellowship. Help from Mr Rajan
centration of s-GO.
Kumar and Prof. Raja Shunmugam is duly acknowledged.
Photocatalytic C–C coupling of benzylic hydrocarbon with
ketones
References
In a typical reaction, 0.5 mmol of the hydrocarbon substrate,
6 equivalents of cyclohexanone and 5 mg of s-CD were taken
in a tube, where cyclohexanone acted as both the reactant and
the solvent. The photocatalytic reactions were performed using
a 34 watt blue LED lamp (hν = 425 nm) at room temperature
under an O2 environment. Magnetic stirring was performed
throughout the reaction. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by TLC using ethyl acetate and hexane as the
eluent. After completion of the reaction, the resulting mixture
was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 ml) and washed with
water (1 × 15 ml). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous
sodium sulphate and evaporated under reduced pressure to
get the residue. The residue was purified using silica gel
column chromatography (100–200 mesh) where a mixture of
hexane and ethyl acetate was used as the eluent.
1 J. Pyun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 46–48.
2 F. Hu, M. Patel, F. Luo, C. Flach, R. Mendelsohn,
E. Garfunkel, H. He and M. Szostak, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2015, 137, 14473–14480.
3 S. Navalon, A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Alvaro and H. Garcia,
Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 6179–6212.
4 F. Zhang, H. Jiang, X. Li, X. Wu and H. Li, ACS Catal., 2014,
4, 394–401.
5 C. Su, M. Acik, K. Takai, J. Lu, S.-J. Hao, Y. Zheng, P. Wu,
Q. Bao, T. Enoki, Y. J. Chabal and K. P. Loh, Nat. Commun.,
2012, 3, 1298.
6 B. Majumdar, D. Sarma, T. Bhattacharya and T. K. Sarma,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 9286–9294.
7 H. Li, R. Liu, S. Lian, Y. Liu, H. Huang and Z. Kang,
Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 3289–3297.
8 D. Sarma, B. Majumdar and T. K. Sarma, ACS Sustainable
Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 16573–16585.
Detection of hydrogen peroxide in the catalytic reactions
To detect H2O2 during the catalytic reaction, a modified iodo-
metric method was employed. After 15 minutes of the reaction
9 T. J. Bandosz and C. O. Ania, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1800293.
between the 2-methoxyhydroperoxide intermediate with cyclo- 10 H. Li, X. He, Z. Kang, H. Huang, Y. Liu, J. Liu, S. Lian,
hexanone under thermal conditions (at 50 °C), an equal
volume of water and dichloromethane was added to extract the
C. H. A. Tsang, X. Yang and S.-T. Lee, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 4430–4434.
formed coupling product. The aqueous layer was acidified 11 K.-W. Chu, S. L. Lee, C.-J. Chang and L. Liu, Polymers, 2019,
with H2SO4 to pH ≈ 2 and 1 mL of a 10% solution of KI and 11, 689.
three drops of 3% solution of ammonium molybdate were 12 N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116,
added. In the presence of hydrogen peroxide I− is oxidised to
10075–10166.
I2, H2O2 + 2I− + 2H+ → 2H2O + I2, and with an excess of iodide 13 C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem.
ions, the tri-iodide ion is formed according to the reaction I2 Rev., 2013, 113, 5322–5363.
(aq.) + I− → I3−. The formation of I3− could be monitored by 14 L. Marzo, S. K. Pagire, O. Reiser and B. König, Angew.
UV-Visible spectroscopy at the wavelength of 353 nm.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 2–41.
15 T. P. Yoon, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 2307–2315.
16 B. Sahoo, M. N. Hopkinson and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2013, 135, 5505–5508.
17 J. Ahmed, S. Chakraborty, A. Jose, P. Sreejyothi and
S. K. Mandal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 8330–8339.
18 S. A. Girard, T. Knauber and C.-J. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2014, 53, 74–100.
19 C. S. Yeung and V. M. Dong, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1215–1292.
20 M. K. Lakshman and P. K. Vuram, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8,
5845–5888.
Author contributions
D. S. planned the experimental sessions and D. S. and
B. M. performed most of the experiments. D. S. and B. M. took
part in sample preparation and characterization. T. K. S. con-
ceived and supervised the research project and wrote the
manuscript with input from the other authors.
21 A. N. Campbell and S. S. Stahl, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45,
851–863.
Conflicts of interest
22 Z. Shi, C. Zhang, C. Tang and N. Jiao, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2012, 41, 3381–3430.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
23 C. J. Scheuermann, Chem. – Asian J., 2010, 5, 436–451.
24 C.-J. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 335–344.
25 A. Pinter, A. Sud, D. Sureshkumar and M. Klussmann,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5004–5007.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge IIT Indore for research funding and
SIC IIT Indore, SAIF, NEHU, Shillong, IIT Kanpur and IIT 26 A. Pinter and M. Klussmann, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012, 354,
Bombay for instrumentation facilities. We thank Mr Siddarth
701–711.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Green Chem., 2019, 21, 6717–6726 | 6725