Hydrocarbyl “Tuning” of the PtII/IV Redox Potential
most stable, platinum(IV) isomer, sym-LPtIVR2H+,3 eq 7a,
while in the case of the electron-poor platinum center in
LPtII(C6F5)2 the most stable product of its protonation should
be the (HL+)PtIIR2 species, eq 7b. In the case of R ) Ph,
platinum(II) and platinum(IV) redox isomers are formed, by
protonation at low temperature, in a 9:1 thermodynamic
ratio.2 Thus, increasing the electron-withdrawing character
and steric bulk of R thermodynamically favors the product
of reaction 6b (7b) over that of reaction 6a (7a).
Experimental Section
General Procedures. All manipulations were carried out under
purified argon using standard Schlenk and glovebox techniques.
Solvents were dried and distilled following standard protocols and
stored in gastight bulbs under argon. All reagents for which a
synthesis is not given are commercially available from Aldrich or
Pressure Chemicals and were used as received without further
purification. All NMR solvents were dried, vacuum-transferred, and
stored in an argon-filled glovebox. [2.1.1]-(2,6)-Pyridinophane1 and
14
PtII-HX Hydrogen Bonding in L′′PtIIR2 Complexes.
Another measure of the relative basicity of the PtII center in
LPtIIR2 species, besides the value of the equilibrium constant
of eq 3, might be the magnitude of the Pt-H coupling
constant in (HL+)PtIIR2. This decreases according to R )
Me > Ph > C6F5 and is the same trend for (HL+)PtIIR2,
becoming more dominant over the platinum(IV) isomer
LPtIVR2H+. There are several literature examples of anionic
pentafluorophenylplatinum(II) complexes [Pt(C6F5)3L′′]-,
with L′′ containing a potential hydrogen bond donor group
HX located in proximity to the metal atom.9,17 In the case
of structurally similar substituted pyridine ligands with
weakly acidic HX donors, such as H-C(sp3), H-C(sp2), and
H-O-C(sp3), no H-Pt coupling was observed, and thus,
no hydrogen bonding by this criterion was found in solu-
tion.17 In contrast, L′′ with the more acidic phenolic hydroxyl,
H-O-C(sp2), showed the presence of such an interaction.9
Since the pyridinium fragment NH+ is more acidic than the
phenolic OH, we can rationalize why the uncharged and less
electron-rich platinum(II) center in (HL+)PtII(C6F5)2 exhibits
Pt‚‚‚H hydrogen bonding. Some degree of flexibility of the
macrocycle L allows certain variation of the Pt-HN+
separation. The platinum(II) center in the case of R ) Me is
so electron-rich that the platinum(II) isomer, eq 3, is no
longer thermodynamically preferred and can be observed
only under conditions of kinetic control.
LPtMe2 have been synthesized according to the published
1
procedures. H and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on an Inova
700 spectrometer (1H, 400 MHz; 19F, 376.43 MHz). H and 19F
1
NMR chemical shifts are reported in parts per million and
referenced to residual solvent resonance peaks in the first two cases
or the BArF peak.
4
Synthesis of [(HL+)PtII(C6F5)2]BArF . A 2 mL Schlenk flask
equipped with a Kontes Teflon valve and magnetic stirring bar was
charged in an argon-filled glovebox with 20 mg of NaBArF (22
4
4
µmol), 20 µmol of LPtMe2, and 0.6 mL of a 3:1 CD2Cl2-
pentafluorobenzene mixture. The flask was then removed from the
glovebox and immersed into an acetone bath cooled to -95 °C.
The Teflon valve was replaced with a serum cap, and a solution of
3.0 mg of HSO3CF3 in 0.1 mL of CD2Cl2 (20 µmol) was added to
the stirred suspension dropwise with a syringe. After 5 min of
stirring at -95 °C the resulting liquid was warmed to room
temperature and transferred to a Teflon-sealed NMR tube. Reaction
1
was monitored by H NMR spectroscopy. In 1 day at 22 °C the
reaction was complete. Heating the reaction mixture at 80 °C in a
sealed NMR tube for 96 h did not change its composition. Colorless
crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by adding
cyclohexane and allowing the mixture to evaporate slowly. Yield:
90%.
[(HL)Pt(C6F5)2]BArF , Data for the Cationic Part. H NMR
1
4
(CD2Cl2, 22 °C): δ 3.31 (m, 1H, C2H4), 3.50 (ddd, J ) 3.1, 13.5,
2
19.8 Hz, 1H, C2H4), 4.11 (m, 1H, C2H4), 4.22 (d, JH-H ) 14.1
Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.54 (d, 2JH-H ) 15.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.81 (ddd, J )
2.9, 13.6, 15.9 Hz, 1H, C2H4), 5.46 (d, 2JH-H ) 14.0 Hz, 1H, CH2),
6.17 (d, 2JH-H ) 15.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 7.42 (d, 3JH-H ) 7.8 Hz, 1H,
m-CH, py), 7.54 (d, 3JH-H ) 7.8 Hz, 1H, m-CH, py), 7.59 (d, 3JH-H
Thus, the basicities of a platinum(II) center toward two
different acids, external H+ (as reflected by the position of
equilibrium 3) and NH+ (as reflected by the value of the
1JPt-H coupling constant in (HL+)PtR2 species), correlate one
with the other.
3
) 8.0 Hz, 1H, m-CH, py), 7.65 (d, JH-H ) 7.8 Hz, 1H, m-CH,
py), 7.66 (d, 3JH-H ) 7.9 Hz, 1H, m-CH, py), 7.83 (t, 3JH-H ) 7.9
3
Hz, 1H, p-CH, py), 7.86 (t, JH-H ) 7.8 Hz, 1H, p-CH, py), 8.19
(t, 3JH-H ) 8.0 Hz, 1H, p-CH, py), 16.33 (br s, 1H, NH). The NH+
proton signal is very broad at 22 °C (half-width of 57 Hz), thus
making locating platinum satellites unreliable. The narrower signal
of the NH+ proton observed at -40 °C (half-width of 21 Hz)
Conclusions
While this paper began by describing two distinct mecha-
nistic possibilities for C-H cleavage, eqs 1 and 2, the fact
that our compounds show equilibrium interconVersion
between the distinct products of these two mechanisms means
that we are unable to make a mechanistic determination in
our examples, from the available observations of CH bond
cleavage. However, the evidence that these products, PtII and
PtIV, are in hydrocarbyl-ligand-dependent equilibrium is an
exceptional case of intramolecular migration between two
redox states via bond breaking and making to H. Such redox
isomerization is certainly facilitated by the hydrogen bonding,
which in turn is another benefit of the “preorganized”
geometry of the pyridinophane ligand on PtII.1
1
resolved the value of JPt-H ) 63 Hz. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, -40
°C): δ -164.40 (ddd, J ) 8.1, 20.3, 29.7 Hz, 1F, m-CF), -164.09
(ddd, J ) 8.3, 20.6, 29.7 Hz, 1F, m-CF), -163.14 (ddd, J ) 8.3,
20.8, 29.2 Hz, 1F, m-CF), -162.90 (ddd, J ) 8.1, 20.5, 29.2 Hz,
3
1F, m-CF), -161.05 (t, JF-F ) 20.3 Hz, 1F, p-CF), -160.93 (t,
3JF-F ) 20.3 Hz, 1F, p-CF), -122.12 (d, JF-F ) 29.2 Hz, JPt-F
3
3
3
3
) 443 Hz, 1F, o-CF), -121.78 (d, JF-F ) 29.2 Hz, JPt-F ) 446
Hz, 1F, o-CF), -119.31 (m, 3JPt-F ) 408 Hz, 1F, o-CF), -118.68
3
(m, JPt-F ) 416 Hz, 1F, o-CF). 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 22 °C): δ
-164.17 (br m, 2F, m-CF), -163.22 (br m, 2F, m-CF), -160.96
3
3
(t, JF-F ) 20.0 Hz, 1F, p-CF), -160.79 (t, JF-F ) 20.0 Hz, 1F,
p-CF), -122.11 (br s, 3JPt-F ) 440 Hz, 2F, o-CF), -119.01 (br m,
3JPt-F ) 400 Hz, 2F, o-CF).
Attempted Reaction of [(HL+)PtII(C6F5)2]BArF4 with Cyclo-
pentane. In an argon-filled glovebox a Teflon-capped NMR tube
was charged with 16.8 mg of (HL+)Pt(C6F5)2BArF4 (10 µmol) and
(17) Casas, J. M.; Fornies, J.; Martin, A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1997, 1559.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2004 3645