Published on Web 05/14/2004
Anion-Directed Self-Assembly of Coordination Polymer into
Tunable Secondary Structure
Ho-Joong Kim,† Wang-Cheol Zin,‡ and Myongsoo Lee*,†
Contribution from the Center for Supramolecular Nano-Assembly and Department of Chemistry,
Yonsei UniVersity, Seoul 120-749, Korea, and Department of Materials Science and
Engineering, Pohang UniVersity of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea
Received January 12, 2004; E-mail: mslee@yonsei.ac.kr
Abstract: A bent-shaped bipyridine ligand containing a dendritic aliphatic side chain has been synthesized
as a ligand and complexed with silver ion through a self-assembling process. The resulting complexes
were observed to self-assemble into supramolecular structures that differ significantly as a function of the
counteranion size in the solid state, as confirmed by 1-D and 2-D X-ray diffraction experiments. The
secondary structure of a cationic coordination chain appears to be dependent on the size of the counteranion.
As the size of anion increases, the secondary structure of the coordination chain changes, from a helical
chain, via a dimeric cycle, to a zigzag chain in the solid state. Interestingly, dilute solutions of the complexes
exhibiting a columnar structure in polar solvents undergo spontaneous gelation and the resulting gels display
a significant Cotton effect in the chromophore of the aromatic unit. These results represent a significant
example that small variation in the anion size can provide a useful strategy to manipulate the secondary
structure of linear chain and thereby solid-state supramolecular structure.
Introduction
interactions into a helical object which, in turn, undergoes self-
assembly into a columnar entity.6-9 Relatively strong, directional
Self-assembly of designed molecules is a challenging topic
of research in the fields of chemical biology and materials
science because it provides the spontaneous generation of a well-
defined, discrete supramolecular architecture from molecular
components under thermodynamic equilibrium.1 In particular,
there is growing interest in the design of synthetic molecules
that are able to self-assemble into a polymeric chain with
compact helical conformations, analogous to the folded state
of natural proteins.2,3 Helical organization in synthetic self-
assembling systems has been achieved by a variety of strategies
including intramolecular hydrogen bonding,3-5 solvophobic
effects,6 and metal-ligand interactions.7 For example, discrete
oligomer chains based on the connection of aromatic moieties
in a meta geometry can fold through specific intramolecular
interactions, such as complexation between conformationally
restricted bent shaped ligands and transition metals that adopt
a linear coordination geometry, can also give rise to extended
polymeric chains with a helical secondary structure.10-12 The
crystal structure of the complex based on a bipyridyl ligand
derived from a 1,1′-binaphthyl unit and a Ni(II) ion, for example,
demonstrated the formation of an infinite helical chain in which
there are four ligands for each turn of the helix.11 Similar to
this, silver ion-mediated self-assembly of a ditopic pyridine
ligand has been reported to result in extended helical springs
with a tunable helix.12 In contrast, for a conformationally flex-
ible, bent shaped ligand, one can envisage the formation of linear
coordination chains that can adopt folded or unfolded secondary
structures, triggered by counteranion binding of cationic poly-
meric backbones through electrostatic interactions.13 Depending
on the size of the counteranion, one of these possibilities may
be favored because the internal binding site of a cationic scaffold
would be complementary in size to anionic guests. As a conse-
quence, the secondary structure of the coordination chain would
be tuned by variation in the size of the binding counteranion.
† Yonsei University.
‡ Pohang University of Science and Technology.
(1) (a) Lehn, J. M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and PerspectiVes;
VCH: Weiheim, Germany. 1995. (b) Antonietti, M.; Fo¨rster, S. AdV. Mater.
2003, 15, 1323-1333. (c) Sarikaya, M.; Tamerler, C.; Jen, A. K. Y.;
Schulten, K.; Baneyx, F. Nature Mater. 2003, 2, 577-585. (d) Lee, M.;
Cho, B.-K.; Zin, W.-C. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3869-3892.
(2) (a) Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem.
ReV. 2001, 101, 3893-4011. (b) Barboiu, M.; Lehn, J. M. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5201-5206. (c) Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.; Rowan, A.
E.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4039-
4070. (d) Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P.
Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4071-4097.
(8) (a) Jiang, H.; Leger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448-
3449. (b) Rowan, A. E.; Nolte, R. J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
63-68.
(3) Ky Hirschberg, J. H. K.; Brunsveld, L.; Ramzi, A.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.;
Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W. Nature 2000, 407, 167-170.
(4) Aggeli, A.; Bell, M.; Carrick, L. M.; Fishwick, C. W. G.; Harding, R.;
Mawer, P. J.; Radford, S. E.; Strong, A. E.; Boden, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 9619-9628.
(5) Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173-180.
(6) Nelson, J. C.; Saven, J. G.; Moore, J. S.; Wolynes, P. G. Science 1997,
277, 1793-1796.
(7) Prince, R. B.; Okada, T.; Moore, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
233-236.
(9) Berl, V.; Krische, M. J.; Huc, I.; Lehn, J.-M.; Schmutz, M.Chem. Eur. J.
2000, 6, 1938-1946.
(10) (a) Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Gudenberg, D. W. V.; Proserpio, D. M. Inorg.
Chem. 1997, 36, 3812-3813.
(11) Cui, Y.; Lee, S. J.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6014-6015.
(12) Jung, O.-S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Lee, Y.-A.; Park, J. K.; Chae, H.-K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 9921-9925.
(13) (a) Piguet, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Hopfgartner, G. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
2005-2026. (b) Hasenknopf, B.; Lehn, J.-M.; O. Kneisel, B.; Baum, G.;
Fenske, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1838-1840.
9
10.1021/ja049799v CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2004, 126, 7009-7014
7009