Communications
CH2-CH2P), 16.0 ppm (m, 1JP, C + 3JP, C = 38.7 Hz, PCH2-CH2-CH2P);
[6] S. Deblon, L. Liesum, J. Harmer, H. Schönberg, A. Schweiger,
H. Grützmacher, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 601 – 611.
[7] J. Dogan, J. B. Schulte, G. F. Schwiegers, S. B. Wild, J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 951 – 957.
31P NMR (162.0 MHz, CD2Cl2): d = 80.3 ppm (d, 1JRh,P = 170 Hz);
103Rh (12.7 MHz, CD2Cl2): d = ꢀ330 ppm (t); meso-6: M.p. > 2508C.
1
=
H NMR (400.13 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): d = 6.70 (m, 2H, CH), 6.57
=
(m, 2H, CH), 4.72 (m, 2H, CHP), 2.50 (m, 2H, PCHH-CH2-CHHP),
[8] rac-6·CH2Cl2: C93H78Cl2F6O6P4Rh2S2; monoclinic; P2(1); a =
1334.0(5), b = 1830.2(7), c = 1793.5(7) pm, b = 104.191(8); V=
2.19 (m, 1H, PCH2-CHH-CH2P), 1.86 (m, 2H, PCHH-CH2-CHHP),
0.89 ppm (m, 1H, PCH2-CHH-CH2P); 13C NMR (100.7 MHz,
4.25(1) nm3, Z = 2, 1calcd = 1.463 mgmꢀ3
, crystal dimensions:
2
CD2Cl2, 298 K): d = 84.6 (m, 2JP, C + JP’,C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 79.3 (m,
0.15 0.15 0.20 mm, diffractometer Siemens CCD 1k area
detector; MoKa radiation, 293 K, measurement range: 3.14 <
2V< 56.568, 20789 independent reflections, 43894 reflections
F > 4s(F), m = 0.644 mmꢀ1; direct methods; refinement against
full matrix (versus F2) with SHELXTL (Rel. 5.1) and SHELXL-
97; 1036 parameters, R1 = 0.0568 and wR2 (all data) = 0.1094,
max/min residual electron density: 916/ꢀ429 enmꢀ3. meso-6:
C53H46F3O3P2RhS; monoclinic; P2(1); a = 1109.6(1), b =
1841.8(1), c = 1189.2(1) pm, b = 111.523(6)8, V= 2.2609(3) nm3,
=
2JP, C + JP’,C = 13.7 Hz, CH), 51.2 (m, 1JP, C + JP’,C = 24.4 Hz, JP, C
=
2
3
2
=
9.0 Hz, CHP), 21.2 (m, 2JP, C + 4JP’,C = 37.2 Hz, PCH2-CH2-CH2P),
20.5 ppm (m, PCH2-CH2-CH2P); 31P NMR (162.0 MHz, CD2Cl2,
298 K): d = 72.0 ppm (d, 1JRh,P = 163 Hz); 103Rh NMR (12.7 MHz,
CD2Cl2, 298 K): d = ꢀ576 ppm (t).
rac-8/meso-8: Sodium (3 mg, 0.13 mmol) was added to a suspen-
sion of the complexes rac-6 and meso-6 (50 mg, 0.056 mmol) in THF
(5 mL). The reaction mixture was sonicated for 12 h at 258C, and
subsequently the resulting deep red reaction mixture was filtered. The
filtrate was evaporated to dryness and washed several times with
hexane leading to a deep red highly air-sensitive powder (45 mg,
67%). rac-8: 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, [D8]THF, 298 K): d = 4.35 (m,
Z = 2, 1calcd = 1.447 mgmꢀ3
, crystal dimensions: 0.12 0.11
0.10 mm, diffractometer Stoe IPDS II image plate system,
MoKa radiation, 293 K, measured range: 3.94 < 2V< 55.728,
9377 independent reflections, 15169 reflections F > 4s(F), m =
2H, CHP), 4.20 (m, 2H, CH), 2.83 (m, 2H, CH), 1.40 (m, 2H,
0.55 mmꢀ1
; direct methods; refinement against full matrix
=
=
PCHH-CH2-CHHP), 1.01 (m, 2H, PCH2-CH2-CH2P), 0.81 ppm (m,
(versus F2) with SHELXTL (Rel. 5.1) and SHELXL-97; 567
parameters; R1 = 0.0403 and wR2 (all data) = 0.0888, max/min
2H, PCHH-CH2-CHHP); 13C NMR (100.7 MHz, [D8]THF, 298 K):
2
d = 57.2 (m, CHP), 53.7 (m, CH), 40.3 (d, JP, C or 2JRh,C = 11.1 Hz,
residual electron density: 426/ꢀ460 enmꢀ3
.
rac-7·2THF:
=
=
CH), 25.6 (m, PCH2-CH2-CH2P), 21.5 ppm (m, PCH2-CH2-CH2P);
C53H54O2P2Rh; monoclinic; P21/n; a = 1318.9(2), b = 1889.8(3),
c = 1807.5(3) pm, b = 109.857(4); V= 4.237(1) nm3, Z = 4,
1calcd = 1.392 mgmꢀ3, crystal dimensions: 0.08 0.14 0.27 mm,
diffractometer Bruker AXS SMART APEX with CCD area
detector; MoKa radiation, 180 K, phase transition at temper-
atures beyond 180 K, measurement range: 3.22 < 2V< 56.588,
10510 independent reflections, 31246 reflections F > 4s(F), m =
0.521 mmꢀ1; direct methods; refinement against full matrix
(versus F2) with SHELXTL (Rel. 5.1) and SHELXL-97; 523
parameters, R1 = 0.0570 and wR2 (all data) = 0.1396, max/min
residual electron density: 916/ꢀ625 enmꢀ3. CCDC-229384 (rac-
6·CH2Cl2), CCDC-229383 (meso-6), CCDC-229385 rac-7·2THF
contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK;
fax: (+ 44)1223-336-033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
1
31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D8]THF, 298 K): d = 81.1 ppm (d, JP, Rh
=
179 Hz); 103Rh NMR (12.7 MHz, [D8]THF, 298 K): d = ꢀ681 ppm
(t). meso-8: 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D8]THF, 298 K): d = 88.1 ppm
(br).
rac-7: A solution of sodium-naphthalenide in THF (0.056m,
0.056 mmol, 1 mL) was added to a suspension of rac-6 (50 mg,
0.056 mmol) in THF (2 mL). The deep green solution was filtered.
After removing the solvent from the filtrate under reduced pressure, a
deep green highly air-sensitive powder was obtained, which was
washed several times with hexane (40 mg, 93%). EPR (THF, 298 K):
g
iso = 2.017 [t, Aiso (31P) = 84 MHz].
rac-7/meso-7: A 1:1 mixture of the compounds rac-8 and meso-8
(29 mg, 0.024 mmol) were mixed in THF (2 mL) with a 1:1 mixture of
rac-6 and meso-6 (20 mg, 0.022 mmol). An immediate color change
from red to deep green was observed. After removing the solvent
under reduced pressure, the product was isolated as highly air-
sensitive deep green powder (40 mg, 93%). meso-7: EPR (THF,
298 K): giso = 2.0145 [dd, A1iso (31P) = 81.8 MHz, A2iso (31P) = 51.4 MHz].
[9] Alternatively, the distortion can be described by the deviation of
Ct from the plane running through the P-Rh-P plane: meso-6:
25.1 pm (Ct1), ꢀ66.3 pm (Ct2); rac-6: 81.5 and 78.7 pm (Ct1),
ꢀ95.4 and ꢀ68.2 pm; rac-7: 100.2 pm (Ct1), ꢀ115.3 pm (Ct2).
[10] The redox potentials of the P-bis(cyclohexyl) substituted com-
Received: October 7, 2003
Revised: January 23, 2004 [Z53027]
plex [Rh(troppcyc)2]+/0/ꢀ1 are at E11=2 = ꢀ1.19 V and E21=2
=
ꢀ1.53 V; S. Deblon, Dissertation, ETH Zürich, 2000, No. 13920.
[11] The EPR parameters were obtained by calculating the exper-
imental spectra (least-squares-fittings using EasySpin, see:
Keywords: electrochemistry · phosphane ligands ·
.
redox chemistry · rhodium · stereochemistry
http://www.esr.ethz.ch).
31
ꢀ
[12] A correlation of Aiso( P) with Rh P separations has been clearly
established in [Rh(dppf)2]0[3] where the Rh P bond lengths show
[1] a) S. Kapp, T. P. Keenan, X. Zhang, R. Fikar, J. A. Potenza, H. J.
Schugar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3452 – 3464, and
references therein; b) W. Kaim, J. Rall, Angew. Chem. 1996,
108, 47 – 64; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 43 – 60.
[2] For impressive examples of this strategy see: a) C. O. Dietrich-
Buchecker, J. Guilhem, J.-M. Kern, C. Pascard, J.-P. Sauvage,
Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 3498 – 3502, and references therein; b) C.
Dietrich-Buchecker, J.-P. Sauvage, J.-M. Kern, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 7791 – 7800.
ꢀ
a linear inverse correlation with the hyperfine couplings.
[13] Experiments with the corresponding diastereomers of [M{bis-
(tropp)}] with M = Ir or Pt show the same behavior as reported
here for M = Rh; C. Laporte, Dissertation, ETH Zürich, 2003,
No. 15137.
[3] B. Longato, R. Coppo, G. Pilloni, R. Corvaja, A. Toffoletti, G.
Bandoli, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 637–639, 710 – 718.
[4] S. Deblon, H. Rüegger, H. Schönberg, S. Loss, V. Gramlich, H.
Grützmacher, New J. Chem. 2001, 23, 83 – 92.
[5] H. Schönberg, S. Boulmaâz, M. Wörle, L. Liesum, A. Schweiger,
H. Grützmacher, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1492 – 1494; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1423 – 1426.
2570
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2567 –2570