flavors and fragrances. Also, although several research groups
have synthesized compounds from the valencane family,
none have been able to produce an economically viable
scheme that would be appropriate for large-scale production.
Therefore, it was our purpose to develop an efficient and
economic asymmetric synthesis for (+)-nootkatone and
analogues that could be applied to an industrial setting and
utilized not only for termite (and other arthropods) control
but also as a grapefruit flavor and fragrance additive.
Most synthetic approaches to the valencane skeletal
framework (Figure 1)6 have relied on Robinson annulation
reactions. However, stereospecific establishment of the
vicinal cis-dimethyl substituents and their relative configu-
ration to the isopropenyl group has proven problematic.7
In 1980, Yoshikoshi described a method for the enanti-
oselective synthesis of (+)-nookatone based on the acid-
mediated, tandem, cyclobutane cleavage-aldol cyclization
reaction sequence depicted in Scheme 1. With such an
stereocenter, and the strong steric bias imparted by the gem-
dimethyl bridge allows for highly stereocontrolled access to
the quaternary stereocenter C4a. Controlling the remaining
stereocenter C4, which is exocyclic to the pinene-derived six-
membered ring, has proved problematic, however. In Yoshi-
koshi’s published route, the relevant stereoselective step,
titanium tetrachloride catalyzed conjugate addition of allyl-
trimethylsilane to pinene-derived enone 3, provided an
inseparable diastereomeric mixture of products in a 4:1 ratio,
leaving room for improvement.8
We reasoned that the olefinic precursor B to Yoshikoshi’s
diketone A could be prepared in a stereospecific manner from
alkoxide D by sequential anionic oxy-Cope rearrangement
followed by alkylation with methyl iodide (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Solving the C4 Stereocenter Problem
Scheme 1. Yoshikoshi Route: the C4 Stereocenter Problem
In lieu of nopinone, inexpensive natural product ꢀ-pinene
2, a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) compound, was
chosen as the starting material for economical and environ-
mental reasons. Although the conversion of ꢀ-pinene to
nopinone could be performed via ozonolysis methods, a safer
alternative was preferred. Implementing Lee’s methodology,9
the oxidative cleavage of ꢀ-pinene was performed with mild
reaction conditions and inexpensive reagents to provide
nopinone in excellent yields (Scheme 3).
Following Yoshikoshi’s procedure, nopinone was con-
verted to the mixed aldol product 3.8 The resulting ketone
was then subjected to Grignard reagents to provide the
tertiary alcohol product 4 in excellent yields and selectivity
(>20:1).
The AOC rearrangement of 4 was found to be extremely
sensitive to reaction conditions, and some optimization
was required to obtain acceptable yields (Scheme 4). When
the AOC rearrangement was run at room temperature, an
unusual fragmentation took place leading to the loss of
the allyl or methallyl unit introduced in the previous
Grignard addition step. Although not typical, this frag-
mentation is not without precedent, and has been proposed
to proceed by a retro-ene mechanism.10 Undesired frag-
effective method for construction of the required ring system,
the problem of nootkatone synthesis is reduced to the
stereocontrolled synthesis of the diketone precursor A. Using
(-)-ꢀ-pinene as a starting material directly provides the C6
(4) In the USA, one Formosan subterranean termite colony, comprising
up to 10 million individuals, is capable of consuming a thousand pounds
of wood per year. The estimated nationwide damage reaches an excess of
$1billion dollars. In Louisiana, the damage caused by this species is valued
at $500 million; New Orleans, alone, accounts for $300 million. Henderson,
G.; Laine, R.; Zhu, B.; Ibrahim, S.; Crowe, W.; Sauer, A. Structure ActiVity
of Natural Pharmacophores Against Formosan Subterranean Termites;
American Chemical Society National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March
23-27, 2003.
(5) (a) Zhu, B. C. R.; Henderson, G.; Chen, F.; Maistrello, L.; Laine,
R. A. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 523–531. (b) Zhu, B. C. R.; Henderson, G.;
Sauer, A. M.; Yu, Y.; Crowe, W. E.; Laine, R. A. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29,
2695–2701.
(6) The definition of the valencane skeleton is used in accord with
Marshall, J. A.; Warne, T. M. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 178–183.
(7) (a) Thomas, A. F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1369–1372. (b)
Inokuchi, T.; Asanuma, G.; Torii, S. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4622–4626.
(c) Hiyama, T.; Shinoda, M.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 37, 3529–
3532, references therein. (d) van der Gen, A.; van der Linde, L. M.;
Witteveen, J. G.; Boelens, H. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1971, 90, 1034–
1054. (e) Bessie`re, Y.; Barthe´le´my, M.; Thomas, A. F.; Pickenhagen, W.;
Starkemann, C. NouV. J. Chim 1978, 2, 365–371.
(8) Yoshikoshi, A.; Yanami, T.; Miyashita, M. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
607–612.
(9) Lee, D. G.; Chen, T.; Wang, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2918–
2919.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009
3531