Imine Hydrolysis and Rh(I)-Imine-Amine Complex
(0.0478P)2 + 7.755P], where P ) (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3. All non-H-atoms
were refined anisotropically, and H-atoms were included in fixed
positions.
Table 1. Crystallographic Data for 2b
2b
formula
fw
cryst color, habit
cryst size (mm3)
space group
a (Å)
C63H64F6N2P3Rh
1158.98
orange, plate
0.52 × 0.32 × 0.12
P21/c
Results and Discussion
The Imine-Amine Complex. The room temperature
reaction of either cis,trans,cis-[Rh(H)2(PR3)2(MeOH)2]PF6 (R
) Ph, 1a; p-tolyl, 1b) or cis-[Rh(PR3)2(MeOH)2]PF6 (R )
Ph or p-tolyl)4,7,8 with an excess of the liquid imine
PhCH2NdCHPh (either with imine/Rh ) 4, as in the
synthetic procedure, or with imine/Rh ) 100, as used in
catalytic conditions under 1 atm H2, see below) in MeOH
under Ar generates the Rh(I) complexes cis-[Rh(PR3)2-
(PhCH2NdCHPh)(NH2CH2Ph)]PF6 (R ) Ph, 2a; p-tolyl, 2b),
containing the η1-imine and η1-benzylamine, a hydrolysis
product of the imine. In situ yields of 2a,b are quantitative,
while isolated yields are ∼50%. Benzaldehyde, the coproduct
11.5104(14)
19.986(2)
b (Å)
c (Å)
25.219(4)
99.299(9)
5725.3(13)
0.442
41237
10051
0.0482
683
â (deg)
V (Å3)
µ (mm-1
)
total reflns
unique reflns
Rint
no. variables
R1 (I > 2σ(I))
wR2a
0.0415 (7604 obsd reflns)
0.1096 (all data)
1.016 (all data)
GOF
a w ) 1/[σ2(Fo ) + (0.0478P)2 + 7.755P], where P ) (Fo + 2Fc )/3.
2
2
2
1
of hydrolysis, was detected by GC and H NMR analyses
1
4.69; N, 2.63. H NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 1.13 (t, 1H, NH2,
of the filtrate from the synthetic procedure; H2 was also
detected by 1H NMR (δ 4.15). The hydrolysis is Rh-
promoted, as the neat imines are stable in MeOH; we have
noted elsewhere Ru-promoted11 and Ir-promoted12 hydrolytic
cleavage of such imines.
2
2JHH ) 12), 1.29 (t, 1H, NH2, JHH ) 12), 2.52 (2 td, 2 H, CH2,
3
2
3
2JHH ) 13, JHH ) 3), 2.63 (2 td, 2H, CH2, JHH ) 13, JHH ) 3),
4.40 (d, 1H, CH2, 2JHH ) 13), 5.12 (d, 1H, CH2, 2JHH ) 13), 5.98
(d, 2H, o-C6H5, 3JHH ) 7), 6.95-7.90 (m, 41H, Ar), 8.01 (bs, 1H,
NdCH), 9.70 (d, 2H, o-C6H5, 3JHH ) 7). 31P{1H} NMR (121 MHz,
The structure of 2b (Figure 1a) reveals essentially square-
planar geometry at Rh, while selected structural parameters
are listed in Table 2; the CdN imine bond is some 0.2 Å
shorter than the CsN bond of the amine. There is close
contact between the phenyl o-H atoms of the amine and an
imine Ph (e.g., C(53)‚‚‚H(63) ) 2.65 Å), which causes
restricted rotation of these two moieties in the solid state
structure and also in solution, see below. Furthermore, one
of the o-protons of the imine Ph ring (H(49)) “docks” over,
and is well within van der Waals distance (2.43 Å) with,
the Rh; the implications of this close interaction are also
evident in the solution structure, see below. The solid state
IR spectrum shows νCdN and νNsH of the coordinated imine
and amine, respectively.
2
CD2Cl2): δ 46.94 (dd, JRhP ) 166, JPP ) 49), 50.07 (dd, JRhP
)
180, 2JPP ) 49). IR (KBr pellet): ν ) 1616 (CdN), 3313 (NsH).
R ) p-Tolyl (2b). Yield: 0.047 g (50%). Anal. Calcd for
C63H64N2P3F6Rh: C, 65.29; H, 5.57; N, 2.42. Found: C, 65.26; H,
1
5.61; N, 2.43. H NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 1.13 (t, 1H, NH2,
2
2JHH ) 12), 1.23 (t, 1H, NH2, JHH ) 12), 2.31 (s, 9H, p-CH3),
2.33 (s, 9H, p-CH3), 2.50 (td, 1H, CH2, 2JHH ) 13, 3JHH ) 3), 2.58
(td, 1H, CH2, 2JHH ) 13, 3JHH ) 3), 4.38 (d, 1H, CH2, 2JHH ) 12),
2
3
5.15 (d, 1H, CH2, JHH ) 12), 5.95 (d, 2H, o-C6H5, JHH ) 7),
6.90-7.85 (m, 35H, Ar), 8.03 (bs, 1H, NdCH), 9.76 (d, 2H,
3
o-C6H5, JHH ) 7). 31P{1H} NMR (121 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 45.15
(dd, JRhP ) 166, 2JPP ) 49), 48.20 (dd, JRhP ) 180, 2JPP ) 49). IR
(KBr pellet): ν ) 1601 (CdN), 3307 (NsH). An X-ray quality
crystal of 2b was obtained by slow evaporation at rt of a CD3OD
solution of the complex.
The rt 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of 2b in CD2Cl2 shows
the expected AMX, 8-line pattern due to inequivalence of
the two phosphine ligands, and on the basis of JRhP values,13
the upfield (δ 45.15 dd, JRhP ) 166, 2JPP ) 49) and downfield
(δ 48.20 dd, JRhP ) 180, 2JPP ) 49) resonances are assigned
to the P-atom trans to the imine and amine, respectively.
The 1H NMR data are unusual in that both the benzylic and
NH2 protons of the amine, and also the benzylic protons of
H2-Hydrogenation Studies. These experiments were performed
in a three-neck flask, with one neck connected to the H2-inlet, a
second neck fitted with a rubber septum that served as the sampling
as well as the injection port for the imine, and the third neck used
to charge the flask with solvent (MeOH, 10 mL) and catalyst
precursor [Rh(COD)(PR3)2]PF6 (up to 1.0 mM). After this mixture
was reacted with H2 (1 atm) at 30 °C for 1 h to form [Rh(H)2-
(PR3)2(MeOH)2]PF6 (R ) Ph, 1a; p-tolyl, 1b),4,7,8 excess imine (up
to 100 mM) was injected via a microsyringe, and the stirred reaction
mixture was sampled (5 µL) periodically, with conversions being
monitored by GC analysis. Systems were also monitored by H2-
absorption at 30 °C in a constant-pressure gas-uptake apparatus.9
the imine, are inequivalent. The amine benzylic protons
2
appear as two triplets of doublets (δ 2.50 and 2.58, JHH
)
3
13, JHH ) 3), due to coupling to the NH2 protons and to
each other, and similarly the NH2 resonances, although less
well resolved, appear as two somewhat broadened triplets
X-ray Crystallographic Analysis. Measurements were made at
173(2) K on a Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer with graphite
monochromated Mo KR radiation (0.71073 Å). Some crystal-
lographic data for 2b are shown in Table 1. The final unit-cell
parameters were based on 354 reflections with 1.31° < θ < 24.99°.
The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-
2
(δ 1.13 and 1.23, JHH ) 12). The NH2 protons are
inequivalent because of restricted rotation of the amine;
similar behavior is seen in a Ru system involving again
2
matrix least-squares (SHELXL-97),10 using w ) 1/[σ2(Fo ) +
(11) Fogg, D. E.; James, B. R. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 2557.
(12) Marcazzan, P.; Patrick, B. O.; James, B. R. Russ. Chem. Bull., Int.
Ed. 2003, 52, 2715 (Mark Vol’pin Memorial Volume).
(13) Marcazzan, P. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC, 2002.
(9) James, B. R.; Rempel, G. L. Can. J. Chem. 1966, 44, 233.
(10) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97; Bruker-AXS: Madison, WI, 1997.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 16, 2004 4821