S. J. Shuttleworth et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 3037–3042
3041
removed using a Genevac centrifugal evaporator, and the
residue partitioned between brine and dichloromethane.
The organic phase containing B was isolated, and treated
with piperidine (20% of overall volume); the reaction
mixture was agitated for 1 h at room temperature, and was
then concentrated to dryness. The residue, C, was then
treated with 1 M HCl (aq), and the solution washed with
dichloromethane. The aqueous phase was isolated and
phenylhydrazine (1.0 equiv) was added, together with a
few drops of concentrated HCl, and the reaction mixture
was heated to 85 ꢁC for 2 h. The solution was cooled,
neutralized with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution,
and the product, D, was extracted with dichloromethane.
The overall yields for the synthesis of D typically exceeded
60%. For the final step, stock solutions of the primary
amine D were treated with equal mole quantities of
isocyanate in N,N-dimethylformamide, in the presence of
signed on a conformationally constrained derivative of a
known peptoid-based NMBR antagonist, and were
produced in a matter of weeks using a rapid solution-
based parallel synthesis approach.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Jinqian Liu, Richard Connors,
Malgorzata Waska, Shichang Miao, Wayne Inman, Ji
Ma, Adam Park, and Stephen Young for their contri-
butions to this work, and to Juan Jaen and Tim Hoey
for their comments.
€
Hunig’s base. After 16 h stirring at room temperature,
References and notes
conversions in excess of 90% to the desired ureas E were
determined by HPLC at 220 and 254 nm using an Agilent
1100 LC/MSD VL ESI system. The products were then
purified directly using automated preparative HPLC (see
Ref. 19). Note that for several examples, step 3 involved
the use of 1,4,-dioxane as the solvent to circumvent
problems with poor aqueous solubility of a number of
phenylhydrazines used in the library synthesis.
1. Moody, T.; Jensen, R. T. Drug. Fut. 1998, 23, 1305–1315.
2. Wada, E.; Way, J.; Shapira, H.; Kusano, K.; Lebacq-
Verheyden, A. M.; Coy, D.; Jensen, R.; Battey, J. Neuron
1991, 6, 421–423.
3. Spindel, E. R.; Giladi, E.; Brehm, P.; Goodman, R. H.;
Segerson, T. P. Mol. Endocrinol. 1990, 4, 1956–1963.
4. Fathi, J.; Corjay, M. H.; Shapira, H.; Wada, E.; Benya,
R.; Jensen, R.; Viallet, J.; Sausville, E. A.; Battey, J. F.
J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 5979–5984.
5. Nagalla, S. R.; Barry, B. J.; Creswick, K. C.; Eden, P.;
Taylor, J. T.; Spindel, E. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1995, 92, 6205–6209.
6. Minamino, N.; Kangawa, M.; Matsuo, H. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1983, 114, 541–548.
7. McDonald, T. J.; Jornvall, J.; Nilsson, G. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1979, 90, 227–233.
8. Brown, M. R.; Carver, K.; Fisher, L. A. Ann. N.Y. Acad.
Sci. 1988, 547, 174–182.
9. McCoy, J. G.; Avery, D. D. Peptides 1990, 11, 595–607.
10. Albers, H. E.; Liou, S. Y.; Stopa, E. G.; Zoeller, R. T.
J. Neurosci. 1991, 11, 846–851.
11. DelaFuente, M.; DelRio, M.; Hernanz, A. J. Neuroimmu-
nol. 1993, 48, 143–150.
17. Typical protocol for cytotoxicity assay: HeLa cells were
seeded at 5k/well in a 96 well plate (6 plates-for triplicate 0
and 72 h readings). A three-fold dilution series of each
compound was generated, starting at 10 mM. The solution
was diluted 8 times to prepare 9 concentrations ranging
from 10 mM to 150 nM. Compound was added to cells (1–
100 lL total volume), and the final concentration of
compound was 100 lM to 15 nM. Zero and 72 h time
points were recorded as follows: (a) 10 lL Alamar Blue
reagent was added to the wells, and the samples were
incubated at 37 ꢁC for 3 h; (b) fluorescence intensity was
then recorded on an LJL Analyst. The relative growth was
compared to a DMSO control well for each compound.
18. Synthesis was accomplished using 24-position ‘Green-
house’ and 96-position METZ Heater-Shaker modules
Purification was conducted using a Parallex Flexe HPLC
System purchased from Biotage Inc. (see www.Bio-
12. Tache, Y.; Melchiorri, P.; Negri, L. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.
1988, 517, 1–541.
13. Eden, J. M.; Hall, M. D.; Higginbottom, M.; Horwell, D. C.;
Howson, W.; Hughes, J.; Jordan, R. E.; Lewthwaite, R. A.;
Martin, K.; McKnight, A. T.; O’Toole, J. C.; Pinnock, R. D.;
Pritchard, M. C.; Suman-Chauban, N.; Williams, S. C.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2617–2622.
19. Ashwood, V.; Brownhill, V.; Higginbottom, M.; Horwell,
D. C.; Hughes, J.; Lewthwaite, R. A.; McKnight, A. T.;
Pinnock, R. D.; Pritchard, M. C.; Suma-Chauhan, N.;
Webb, C.; Williams, S. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998,
8, 2589–2594.
14. Horwell, D. C.; Pritchard, M. C. PCT/US97/13871;
WO9807718.
20. Tokita, K.; Hocart, S. J.; Katsuno, T.; Mantey, S.; Coy,
D. H.; Jensen, R. T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 495–504.
21. Resolution of 20 was accomplished using a Waters 600
Tower system equipped with a Chiralpak AD column
15. Protocol for whole cell radioligand binding assay: Human
embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells were stably trans-
fected with expression plasmids encoding hNMBR. Com-
petition binding assays were performed for 1 h at room
temperature in the presence of 150 pM 125I-[D-Tyr0]NMB
(2200 Ci/mmol, Perkin–Elmer Life Sciences) and 1 · 106
transfected cells in Dulbeco’s Modified Eagle Media
(Mediatech, Inc.) in 100 lL in 96 well plates. Bound
ligand was separated from unbound ligand by filtration
using a Filtermate (Packard) and total counts bound
determined on a TopCount NTX reader (Packard).
16. Typical synthetic procedure for 2 and analogues thereof: A
solution of N-Fmoc-amino-4-(ethylene ketal)cyclohexyl-
carboxylic acid, A (1.0 wt) in N,N-dimethylformamide was
treated with amine (1.0 equiv), HBTU (1.2 equiv) and
(Daicel Chemical Industries
#
AD00CJ-DG008,
25 cm · 2 cm). Protocol: a solution of 20 (8.0 mg in
500 mL isopropyl alcohol) was injected and an isocratic
gradient of 8% isopropyl alcohol in hexanes at 20 mL/min
was maintained. The fractions corresponding to the two
enantiomers (30 ¼ 35 min; 31 ¼ 27min) were isolated,
and were concentrated in vacuo to afford 30 (1.96 mg) and
31 (2.23 mg). LCMS analysis17 confirmed the desired
molecular weights (M + 1 ¼ 636.5) of both products, and
purities were determined by analytical HPLC using a
Hewlett Packard series 1050 Tower system with a Daicel
Chemical Industries Chiralpak AD-H column (# AD-
H0CE-DC041, 25 cm · 0.4 cm), employing an isocratic
gradient of 8% IPA in hexanes at 1 mL/min. Both 30
and 31 were determined to have enantiomeric excesses
€
Hunig’s base (1.2 equiv), and the reaction mixture was
agitated at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was