P.J.W. Elder et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 716 (2012) 11e18
13
ε ¼ 19,326 cm2/mol. IR (cmꢁ1): 3732w, 3098w, 2951m, 2926m,
2869m, 1598s, 1584s, 1557m, 1515s, 1465w, 1455w, 1420w, 1404w,
1376s, 1360s, 1337s, 1307s, 1270s, 1254s, 1216m, 1189m, 1151m,
1139s, 1126s, 1102s, 1072m, 984w, 858m, 830m, 795w, 754w, 735w,
725w, 687w, 666w, 637w, 614w, 585w, 563w, 537w, 510w. HRMS
(EI, %): m/z Found: 340.1906 (Mþ, 13) Calculated 340.1899.
1307s,1262s,1233s,1196w,1139s, 1104s,1073m,1024m, 992w,
892w, 869m, 834w, 818m, 798w, 747w, 727w, 691w, 634w,
566w, 539w, 518w. HRMS (EI, %): m/z Found: 466.0866
(Mþ, 65) Calculated: 466.0866.
2.3.5. [(2-Iodo-4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]N,N-dimethylaniline
(C14H13N4O2I) (6)
2.3.3. Mercuration of N-ethyl-4-[(4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl] N-
pentylaniline
The compound was prepared using the above mercuration method
from 4-nitroaniline (1.02 g, 7.39 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaniline
(0.887 g, 7.33 mmol), followed by mercuration of a small amount
of material (0.0317 g, 0.117 mmol) with Hg(CF3CO2)2 (0.120 g,
0.281 mmol) and treatment with iodine (0.203 g, 0.798 mmol),
yielding a dark red powder (0.245 g, 0.906 mmol, 48%). Crystals
suitable for X-ray diffraction were grown by slow evaporation of
a chloroform/toluene solution. Yield ¼ 1.616 g, 4.082 mmol, 56%. 1H
In a typical experiment, 1 (0.064 g, 0.19 mmol) and mercury
trifluoroacetate (0.159 g, 3.72 mmol) were combined with anhy-
drous trifluoroacetic acid (0.13 mL) under nitrogen. The mixture
was heated with stirring for 48 h in an oil bath at 68 ꢂC. A
concentrated solution of sodium chloride (0.055 g, 0.942 mmol)
and sodium acetate (0.190 g, 2.31 mmol) was added to the reaction
flask and the entire sample was treated with ultrasound for 10 min.
The crude material was extracted with dichloromethane, dehy-
drated and used immediately for the iodination step.
NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, 5.32 ppm):
d
¼ 3.13 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 6.78
(d, 2H, H2 H6), 7.66 (d, 2H, H9), 7.94 (d, 2H, H5 H3), 8.22 (dd, 2H, H8),
8.79 (d,1H, H11). 13C-DEPTq NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, 54.0 ppm): 40.6
(s, 2C, N(CH3)2), 99.8 (s, 1C, C7), 112.2 (s, 2C, C2 C6), 117.5 (s, 1C, C8),
124.8 (s,1C, C9),127.4 (s, 2C, C3 C5),135.4 (s,1C, C11),145.2 (s,1C, C4),
148.4 (s, 1C, C12), 154.5 (s, 1C, C1), 156.0 (s, 1C, C10). UV (CH2Cl2):
lmax ¼ 502 nm, ε ¼ 25,294cm2/mol. IR (cmꢁ1): 3732w, 3087w, 2901w,
2854w, 2816w, 1610s, 1571m, 1553m, 1518s, 1506s, 1441w, 1416m,
1409m, 1357s, 1327s, 1306s, 1258m, 1238m, 1196w, 1139s, 1105s,
1064m, 1028w, 995w, 940w, 899w, 886w, 832w, 820m, 747w, 725w,
699w, 690w, 634w, 549w, 537w, 520w, 511w. HRMS (EI, %):
m/z Found: 396.0094 (Mþ, 100) Calculated: 396.0083.
2.3.4. Iodination of the mercuriated azodye
Iodine (0.202 g, 0.80 mmol) was added to the crude product of
mercuration in chloroform. This solution was then stirred for 48 h
and washed with concentrated sodium bicarbonate. Aqueous
sodium thiosulfate was added to the mixture with stirring. After
5 min, the organic layer was separated and dehydrated with
sodium sulfate then evaporated to dryness. The dark residue was
treated with a mixture of acetonitrileewater (86% v/v) and sepa-
rated by semi-preparative HPLC in 100 mL portions. The method
employed an 8 mL/min flow rate with a stepwise elution profile
that began isocratic 86% v/v for 14 min, and was followed by a linear
gradient to 100% acetonitrile over 1 min. The two major fractions
were collected, which were in order of elution:
2.4. Timed experiments
In a typical experiment, compound 1 (0.064 g, 0.19 mmol) and
mercury trifluoroacetate (0.159 g, 3.72 mmol) were combined with
anhydrous trifluoroacetic acid (0.13 mL) in each of six reaction
tubes of a parallel synthesis reactor (Argonaut FirstMateÔ). The
samples were maintained at 68 ꢂC with vigorous stirring under
nitrogen. Each mixture was quenched at a prescribed time by
addition of 2 mL of a solution of sodium chloride (0.47 M) and
sodium acetate (1.16 M). Each sample was treated with ultrasound
for 10 min, washed repeatedly with aqueous sodium bicarbonate,
centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed by pipette. The
solid residue was treated with a solution of iodine in chloroform
for 48 h. After removing the solvent, the solid samples were
washed with aqueous sodium thiosulfate and water to remove
residual iodine.
(i) N-ethyl-4-[(2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl] N-pentyla-
niline (C19H22N4O2I2) (5). tr ¼ 12.4 min 1H NMR (CD2Cl2):
d
¼ 0.94 (t, 3H, HC19), 1.25 (t, 3H, HC14), 1.39 (m, 4H, HC17 HC18),
1.69 (q, 2H, HC16), 3.41 (t, 2H, HC15), 3.51 (q, 2H, HC13), 6.68 (d,
2H, HC2 HC6), 7.91 (d, 2H, HC3 HC5), 8.76 (s, 2H, HC9 HC11).
13C-DEPTq NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, 54.0 ppm):
d
¼ 12.6 (s, 1C,
C14), 14.2 (s, 1C, C19), 23.0 (s, 1C, C18), 27.7 (s, 1C, C16), 29.9 (s,
1C, C17), 46.1 (s, 1C, C13), 51.4 (s, 1C, C15), 87.8 (s, 2C, C8 C12),
111.8 (s, 2C, C2 C6), 127.2 (s, 2C, C3 C5), 135.9 (s, 2C, C9 C11),
145.7 (s, 1C, C4), 147.0 (s, 1C, C7), 152.9 (s, 1C, C1), 159.4 (s, 1C,
C10). UV (CH2Cl2): lmax ¼ 460 nm, ε ¼ 13,080 cm2/mol. IR
(cmꢁ1): 3732w, 3363w, 3186w, 3088w, 3071w, 2957m, 2923s,
2852m, 1733w, 1646w, 1632w, 1605m, 1570w, 1556w, 1524w,
1508w, 1462w, 1410w, 1371w, 1333m, 1311w, 1275w, 1260w,
1216w, 1196w, 1184w, 1137m, 1114w, 1073w, 1043w, 995w,
946w, 914w, 893w, 879w, 822w, 795w, 749w, 739w, 720w,
703w, 525w, 503w. HRMS (EI, %): m/z Found: 591.9828
(Mþ, 100) Calculated: 591.9832.
2.5. X-ray crystallography
A single crystal of 7 was mounted on a Siemens P4 four-cycle
diffractometer with a Bruker 1000 CCD detector and a rotating
ꢀ
(ii) N-ethyl-4-[(2-iodo-4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl] N-pentylani-
anode utilizing Mo-K
a
radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 A, graphite mono-
line (C19H23N4O2I) (4). tr ¼ 14.2 min 1H NMR (CD2Cl2):
d
¼ 0.94
chromator) equipped with an OXFORD cryosystem. A hemisphere
(t, 3H, HC19), 1.25 (t, 3H, HC14), 1.39 (m, 4H, HC17 HC18), 1.69
(q, 2H, HC16), 3.41 (t, 2H, HC15), 3.51 (q, 2H, HC13), 6.82 (d, 2H,
HC2 HC6), 7.68 (d, 1H, HC12), 7.94 (d, 2H, HC3 HC5), 8.24 (dd, 1H,
HC11), 8.81 (d, 1H, HC9). 13C-DEPTq NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2,
of reciprocal lattice was scanned in 0.36ꢂ steps in
u
with a crystal-
to-detector distance of 4.97 cm. Preliminary orientation matrices
were obtained from the first frames using SMART [32]. The
collected frames were integrated using preliminary orientation
matrices which were updated every 100 frames. Final unit cell
parameters were obtained by the refinement of the position of
54.0 ppm):
d
¼ 12.7 (s, 1C, C14), 14.4 (s, 1C, C19), 23.1 (s, 1C,
C18), 27.8 (s, 1C, C16), 29.8 (s, 1C, C17), 46.1 (s, 1C, C13), 51.4
(s, 1C, C15), 100.0 (s, 1C, C12), 112.0 (s, 2C, C2 C6), 117.5 (s, 1C,
C8),124.8 (s,1C, C9),127.7 (s, 2C, C5 C3),135.4 (s,1C, C11),144.0
(s, 1C, C4), 147.7 (s, 1C, C7), 153.7 (s, 1C, C1), 156.3 (s, 1C, C10).
UV (CH2Cl2): lmax ¼ 520 nm, ε ¼ 27,310 cm2/mol. IR (cmꢁ1):
3186w, 3086w, 2953m, 2921s, 2851m, 1734w, 1645w, 1600s,
1570m, 1555m, 1515s, 1436w, 1400m, 1357m, 1325s, 1314s,
reflections with I > 10s(I) after integration of all data using SAINT
[32]. The data sets were empirically corrected for absorption and
other effects using SADABS [33]. The structure was solved by direct
methods and refined by the full-matrix least squares method on all
F2 data using SHELXTL [34]. All non-H atoms were refined aniso-
tropically; H atoms were constrained to idealized positions using