362
significant prevalence of a given conformation. In fact, conformers
1, 3 and 7 (Fig. 3) are the main contributors for the conformational
isomerism between diaxial (1 and 3) and diequatorial (7) forms for
this compound (see calculated relative energies in Table 1). Pop-
ulation of the diequatorial conformer increases by increasing the
alkoxy chain, giving ethoxy and isopropoxy derivatives (76 and
77% of diequatorial conformer, respectively). These results indi-
cate that syn-1,3-diaxial repulsions are more destabilizing than the
steric hindrance between bromine and the alkoxy groups. How-
ever, the figure changes for the tert-butoxy derivative, in which the
diaxial conformer is more stable than the diequatorial one and is
populated by 56% in the equilibrium. Opposite to ethoxy and iso-
propoxy derivatives, which may direct the alkoxy group far from
the bromine atom in the diequatorial conformer (e.g. conformers 8
and 6 (Fig. 3) of the ethoxy and isopropoxy derivatives, respec-
tively), the tert-butoxy compound cannot avoid the interaction
between bromine and methyl groups in the diequatorial conformer,
even with the ˛ dihedral angle making the O–C(CH3)3 bond being
directed in the opposite side in relation to the bromine atom,
since in the diaxial conformation, the t-butoxy group is completely
pointed back toward the cyclohexane ring.
and RR), and FAPEMIG and FAPESP for the studentships (to JMS,
RAC and FPS).
References
[1] C.J. Duarte, M.P. Freitas, J. Mol. Struct. 930 (2009) 135.
[2] M.P. Freitas, C.F. Tormena, R. Rittner, R.J. Abraham, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 16 (2003)
27.
[3] R.J. Abraham, T.A.D. Smith, W.A. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1996)
1949.
[4] A. Kovács, V. Izvekov, G. Keresztury, C.J. Nielsen, P. Klæboe, Chem. Phys. 335
(2007) 205.
[5] H. Bodot, D.D. Dicko, Y. Gounelle, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1967) 870.
[6] M.P. Freitas, C.F. Tormena, R. Rittner, R.J. Abraham, Spectrochim. Acta A 59
(2003) 1783.
[7] J.V. Coelho, M.P. Freitas, T.C. Ramalho, C.R. Martins, M. Bitencourt, R.A. Cor-
manich, C.F. Tormena, R. Rittner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 494 (2010) 26.
[8] M.P. Freitas, C.F. Tormena, R. Rittner, Spectrochim. Acta A 59 (2003) 1177.
[9] P. Pukhan, P. Chakraborty, D. Kataki, J. Org. Chem. 71 (2006) 7533.
[10] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheese-
man, J.A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S.
Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A.
Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa,
M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, H.P.
Hratchian, J.B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Strat-
mann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K.
Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich,
A.D. Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari,
J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Ste-
fanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith,
M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. John-
son, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J.A. Pople, Gaussian 03, Revision D.02,
Gaussian, Pittsburgh, 2004.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank FAPEMIG and FAPESP for the financial support of
this research, as well as CNPq for the fellowships (to MPF, TCR, CFT