Antioxidant and Hepatoprotector Activity of Water-soluble 4-Propylphenols
179
PhO· + ROO· ® QP
The LDLPs were purified from residual KBr by chromatog-
raphy on a Sephadex G25 column. The protein content in
LDLPs was determined by the Lowry method. The isolated
LDLPs were oxidized at 37°C in the presence of CuSO4
(5 mM) or FeSO4 (25 mM) [9]. The antioxidant concentra-
tions were 1, 10, or 100 mM. Accumulation of the lipid
peroxidation (LPO) product (MDA) capable of interacting
with thiobarbituric acid was monitored by fluorescence spec-
troscopy (Hitachi Model P3000 spectrofluorimeter) [10]. The
antioxidant properties of the synthesized compounds were
evaluated by their effective concentrations producing a 50%
inhibition (ID50) of the MDA accumulation during a 30-min
incubation of LDLPs in the presence of metal ions.
Because of certain features of the spin density distribu-
tion and spatial hindrances with respect to ortho position, the
phenoxy radicals of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-alkylphenols attach
ROO× so as to form predominantly the para isomers of QP:
OOR
O
·O
R'
·
+ ROO
R'
The experimental toxic hepatitis in (C57Bl/6XCBA)F1
mice was induced by intraperitoneal injections of a 10%
tetrachloromethane solution in olive oil (0.2 ml per animal
weighing 25 g). The synthesized compounds were dissolved
in physiological solution and introduced intraperitoneally 2 h
before tetrachloromethane. The phenolic compounds were
used in the concentrations of 5 ´ 10 – 5 and 1 ´ 10 – 4 M/kg,
which corresponds to 20 and 40 mg/kg of glutoxime. The
degree of liver damage was evaluated by the
alanineaminotransferase (ALT) activity in the blood serum
[11] determined 24 h after tetrachloromethane introduction.
The ALT activity was estimated by an UV technique using a
Biocon reagent kit [12] and expressed in units of enzyme ac-
tivity per liter blood serum (U/liter). The experimental data
were statistically processed in terms of the classical Student’s
criterion.
Apparently, the large volume and considerable polarity
of the ionogenic fragment R¢ = CH2CH2CH2X hinder the at-
tack of the hydroperoxide radical of methyl oleate at the para
position of phenol ring. This leads to a decrease in the reac-
tion rate constant k7 and, hence, in the inhibition coefficient f.
The values of k7 for 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-alkylphenols are
usually close to the rate constants for analogous compounds
not substituted at the ortho position [13]. However, com-
pounds V – VIII virtually do not inhibit the AIBN-initiated
oxidation of methyl oleate. This is probably explained by the
low stability of the phenoxy radicals formed by these com-
pounds.
Derivatives of the spatially-hindered phenols I – IV ex-
hibit a pronounced inhibition of the LPO of LDLPs, signifi-
cantly exceeding in this respect the ortho-unsubstituted
analogs V – VIII. Characterized by a lower antiradical activ-
ity than ionol, compounds II – IV are nevertheless compara-
ble with ionol in the ability to inhibit the LPO of LDLPs. The
difference between the antiradical and antioxidant activity of
these phenols can be related to the antioxidant properties of
ionogenic fragments – thiosulfonate, isothiuronium, and
alkylammonium. These groups probably account for the anti-
oxidant properties of the ortho-unsubstituted phenols
VI – VIII. Note that sulfonate V virtually does not affect the
oxidation of LDLPs.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Experimental data on the antioxidant activity of the syn-
thesized compounds are presented in Table 1. As can be seen,
all the water-soluble 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-alkylphenols (I – IV)
exhibit similar k7 values, close to the corresponding reaction
rate constant for ionol. This result is quite natural, since the
ionogenic fragments separated from the aromatic nucleus by
a hydrocarbon chain cannot significantly influence the reac-
tivity of the phenolic OH group or the stability of the
phenoxy radical. At the same time, compounds I – IV and
potassium phenosane are inferior to ionol with respect to the
inhibition coefficient f .
With respect to the ability of reducing ALT activity on
the toxic hepatitis model, the compounds studied can be ar-
ranged in the following order: alkylammonium
IV » isothiuronium III > thiosulfonate II > sulfonate I > po-
tassium phenosane » alkylammonium VIII > isothiuronium
VII > thiosulfonate VI > glutoxime (Fig. 2).
As is known [13], the antioxidant activity of phenolic
compounds is based on the reaction of PhOH with a
hydroperoxide radical:
Thus, the results of our investigation indicate that wa-
ter-soluble 2,6-di-(tert-butyl)-4-(n-propyl)phenol deriva-
tives, containing thiosulfonate, isothiuronium, and alkylam-
monium groups (compounds II – IV) as hydrophilic frag-
ments, can effectively inhibit oxidation of LDLPs in vitro
and produce a hepatoprotector effect in vivo. Therefore, these
substances are worthy of further preclinical investigation as
hepatoprotector drugs.
PhOH + ROO· ® PhO· + ROOH.
Under the conditions of initiated oxidation, the main
pathway of decomposition of the phenoxy radicals PhO× is
the formation of quinoid peroxides QP via the reaction