However, the recent report describing the structure of the
20S proteosome inhibitor TMC-95A (5) (and congeners),2
with its C(3) oxidized oxindole core, simulated a reinvestiga-
tion of this dormant area of tryptophan chemistry. One
approach to the synthesis of this microbial metabolite might
pass through the spirocyclic butyrolactone oxindole construct
6 as part of the fragment coupling strategy summarized in
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3. Model for Diastereoselective Cyclization of
Tryptophan Derivatives Bearing an Ether Substituent at the
Indolic Position
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic Analysis for TMC-95A
The initial attempt to probe this strategy for introducing
stereoselectivity into tryptophan oxidative cyclizations relied
on the normally dependable brominative cyclization pro-
cedure1a,b,g,i to convert a C(â)-oxidized tryptophan derivative
into the desired oxindole, Scheme 4. Construction of the
Scheme 4. Model Brominative Cyclizations
The synthesis sub-goal 6 bears a C(7) ether moiety (TMC-
95A numbering) that may be the missing stereochemical
determinant in tryptophan oxidative cyclizations. Two di-
astereotopic transition states can be envisioned, 7a and 7b,
for the cyclization of a C(7) functionalized tryptophan
derivative (Scheme 3). In these models, a generic C(3) sp2-
hybridized electrophile is indicated since the mechanistic
uncertainty described with Scheme 1 makes further refine-
ment impossible. In particular, a burgeoning steric interaction
(cf. 7b) between the C(7) ether substituent and the peri-
positioned hydrogen Hp might serve to steer the cyclization
of 7 down an alternate pathway favoring formation of the
diastereomer 8a. Transition state construct 7a also may enjoy
an additional energetic benefit via Felkin-Ahn-type LUMO-
LUMO mixing between σ*C-O and the p orbital of the
electrophile, an advantage that is not available in the
diastereomeric species 7b. On the basis of the results with
the simple tryptophan derivatives highlighted in Scheme 1,
the influence of the R-stereogenic (NHR) center is not
expected to overwhelm any of these putative control ele-
ments. The test of this hypothesis is described below.
C(R)-(S)/C(â)-(S) diastereomer 10 followed from known
enoate 93 by application of a protocol developed by Boger
et al.4 The Sharpless bishydroxylation5 of indole derivative
9 provided a diol product in g99% ee (HPLC, OJ-H column).
The low yield for this sequence can be attributed to a
problematical azide reduction/acylation step, but a disap-
pointing cyclization outcome provided little reason to pursue
optimization studies. Treatment of tryptophan derivative 10
under a variety of bromonium ion initiated oxidative cy-
clization procedures afforded varying amounts of a single
cyclization product. Under the most favorable conditions
(NBS, NaHCO3), yields as high as 67% could be obtained.
Spectroscopic analysis (e.g., IR 1764 cm-1; compare 1800
cm-1 for structures of the type 4)1g of this diastereomerically
pure tricycle led to the conclusion that incorporation of the
(2) Isolation: (a) Kohno, J.; Koguchi, Y.; Nishio, M.; Nakao, K.; Kuroda,
M.; Shimizu, R.; Ohnuki, T.; Komatsubara, S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
990-995. Total synthesis. (b) Lin, S.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 512-515. (c) Albrecht, B. K.; Williams, R. M. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 197-200. (d) Inoue, M.; Sakazaki, H.; Furuyama, H.; Hirama,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2654-2657. Synthesis studies: (e)
Ma, D.; Wu, Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9089-9093. (f) Ma, D.; Wu,
Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5279-5281. (g) Kaiser, M.; Siciliano, C.;
Assfalg-Machleidt, I.; Groll, M.; Milbradt, A. G.; Moroder, L. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 3435-3437. (h) Berthelot, A.; Piguel, S.; Le Dour, G.; Vidal, J.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9835-9838. (i) Yang, Z.-Q.; Kwok, B. H. B.;
Lin, S.; Koldobskiy, M. A.; Crews, C. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. ChemBioChem
2003, 4, 508-513. (j) Lin, S.; Yang, Z.-Q,; Kwok, B. H. B.; Koldobskiy,
M.; Crews, C. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6347-
6355.
(3) Bran˜a, M. F.; Garranzo, M.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; Pe´rez-Castells,
J.; Torres, M. R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4825-4836.
(4) Boger, D. L.: Patane, M. A.; Zhou, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
8544-8556.
(5) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
1994, 94, 2483-2547.
2850
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 17, 2004