L. Banfi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 6637–6640
6639
Table 1. Ugi reaction of pyrrolines 4
Entrya
R1
R2–CO2H
R3
Products
Yield% (2+3)
Dr (2:3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Bn
Bn
n-C3H7–CO2H
n-C3H7–CO2H
Ph–CO2H
SiMe2t-Bu
Trityl
2, 3a
2, 3b
2, 3c
2, 3d
2, 3e
2, 3f
2, 3g
2, 3h
2, 3i
45
68:32b
53:47c
53:47e,f
64:36b
63:37b
68:32e
64:36e
65:35e
66:34e
70
CH2CO2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
SiMe2t-Bu
62d
44d
46d
60
n-Bu
t-Bu
Bn
Ph–CO2H
Ph–CO2H
CH2@CH(CH2)2–CO2H
Fmoc-L-Ala
Bn
Bn
80
69
Fmoc-D-Ala
Boc-L-Asp(OBn)
Bn
85
a All the reactions were carried out in MeOH (0.30M) at rt for 1–2h.
b By GC–MS.
c By weight.
d Yield from 9a.
e By HPLC.
f Determined after SiMe2t-Bu removal (n-Bu4NF, THF, rt, 69%).
1001–1004; Belvisi, L.; Caporale, A.; Colombo, M.;
Manzoni, L.; Potenza, D.; Pisano, C. Helv. Chim. Acta
2002, 85, 4353–4368.
6. All new compounds were fully characterized by 1H and
13C NMR, IR, GC–MS (when possible) and [a]D.
7. Mulzer, J.; Meier, A.; Buschmann, J.; Luger, P. Synthesis,
1996, 123–132.
8. Xia, Q.; Ganem, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1597–1598.
9. Larcheveque, M.; Lalande, J. Tetrahedron 1984, 40,
1061–1065; Gringore, O. H.; Rouessac, F. P. Org. Synth.
1985, 63, 121–126.
10. In our case the displacement, promoted by sodium azide
on the mesylate, worked well, contrary to a previous
report on similar compounds,7 and we obtained a com-
plete conversion of 7a,b into 8a,b in excellent yields.
Moreover this two-step sequence is safer than the one-step
Mitsunobu reaction involving hydrazoic acid used by the
same authors to overcome the decomposition of the
mesylate.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) HF, CH3CN, 0°C; (b) (i) H2,
Pd/C, EtOH, rt; (ii) PyBOP, Et3N, CH2Cl2 2mM, reflux.
tidomimetics. Studies in these fields are still under inves-
tigation in our group and will be reported in due course.
11. This was proved by NMR analysis of both diastereomeric
MosherÕs esters of 7a.
12. Ugi, I.; Steinbruckner, C. Angew. Chem. 1960, 72,
¨
267–268; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21,
810–819; Do¨mling, A.; Ugi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 3168–3210.
Acknowledgements
´
13. Flanagan, D. M.; Joullie, M. M. Synth. Commun. 1989,
19, 1–12; Bowers, M. M.; Carroll, P.; Joullie, M. M. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1989, 857–865.
14. Hatam, M.; Tehranfar, D.; Martens, J. Synthesis 1994,
619–623; Gro¨ger, H.; Hatam, M.; Martens, J. Tetrahedron
The authors gratefully thank the University of Genova
and M.I.U.R. (COFIN 02) for financial support, Mr.
Claudio Repetto for his collaboration, Drs. Delia Ber-
toia and Valeria Rocca for performing HPLC analysis
and Prof. Emanuele Magi for HPLC–MS experiments.
´
1995, 51, 7173–7180; Maison, W.; Lutzen, A.; Kosten, M.;
¨
Schlemminger, I.; Westerhoff, O.; Martens, J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1999, 3515–3525; Maison, W.;
Lutzen, A.; Kosten, M.; Schlemminger, I.; Westerhoff,
¨
References and notes
O.; Saak, W.; Martens, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1
2000, 1867–1871; Schlemminger, I.; Janknecht, H.-H.;
Maison, W.; Saak, W.; Martens, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 7289–7292.
1. Hanessian, S.; McNaughton-Smith, G.; Lombart, H.-G.;
Lubell, W. D. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 12789–12854.
2. Gottschalk, K.-E.; Kessler, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 3767–3774; Haubner, R.; Finsinger, D.; Kessler,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 1375–1389.
3. Golebiowski, A.; Jozwik, J.; Klopfenstein, S. R.; Colson,
A. O.; Grieb, A. L.; Russel, A. F.; Rastogi, V. L.; Diven,
C. F.; Portlock, D. E.; Chen, J. J. J. Comb. Chem. 2002, 4,
584–590.
15. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 2, 3,
registered at room temperature in d6-DMSO, show the
presence of two rotamers, deriving from restricted rotation
around the N(ring)–CO bond. When registered at 100°C,
the 13C spectra gave only a single set of signals. At the
1
same temperature, the H spectra show usually collapsed
4. Banfi, L.; Basso, A.; Guanti, G.; Riva, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 7655–7658.
5. Belvisi, L.; Bernardi, A.; Checchia, A.; Manzoni, L.;
Potenza, D.; Scolastico, C.; Castorina, M.; Cupelli, A.;
Giannini, G.; Carminati, P.; Pisano, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
signals as well, but they were rather broad. Interestingly in
the trans adducts, the NH proton of the major conformer
was always downfield (with a typical difference of 0.3–
0.6ppm and a regular rotamer ratio around 2:1), while in
the cis compounds it fell upfield [with a typical difference