Diels-Alder Cycloadditions of 2(H)-1,4-Oxazin-2-ones
A Comparison between the Cycloadditions of
2(H)-1,4-Oxazin-2-ones and 2(H)-Pyran-2-ones. It is
clear from these observations that the reactivity, as well
as regio and stereoselectivity of the cycloadditions of 2(H)-
1,4-oxazin-2-ones does parallel closely those of 2(H)-
pyran-2-ones. In particular, the favored cycloadduct in
the cycloadditions of 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones has the cor-
responding configuration to those obtained in the cy-
cloadditions of 2(H)-pyran-2-ones. Therefore, in a broad
sense, 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones can be considered 2-azadi-
ene analogues of 2(H)-pyran-2-one dienes. As such, highly
advantageous synthetic methodologies based on cycload-
ditions of 2(H)-pyran-2-ones which afford highly substi-
tuted six-membered carbocycles can be translated to
analogous methodologies based on cycloadditions of 2(H)-
1,4-oxazin-2-ones to afford highly substituted piperidine
rings. Indeed, both Hoornaert and we have shown the
value of this methodolgy in target synthesis.24
However, the cycloaddition chemistry of 2(H)-1,4-
oxazin-2-ones is clearly more subtle than that of 2(H)-
pyran-2-ones both in the scope of dienophiles they react
with, and in the role of ring substituents on the control
of the electron demand of the cycloaddition. Since in
cycloadditions of 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones a wider range of
substituents are tolerated both on the diene and dieno-
phile, this is a more versatile synthetic method and can
afford a more diverse range of heavily substituted six-
membered rings. 2(H)-1,4-Oxazin-2-ones are also more
reactive than 2(H)-pyran-2-ones in the sense that they
react with dienophiles regardless of their electronic
demand, and sometimes even with their electronically
mismatched dienophiles. This results in less stereose-
lectivity in cycloadditions, although it is possible to
control the regiochemistry of cycloadditions by matching
the electron demand between oxazinone diene and di-
enophiles.
ether and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether.12 The partnering of
electron-deficient 3,5-dichloro-6-methyl-1,4-oxazin-2-one,
1, with methyl vinyl ether (MVE) represents a matching
of electron demands between the diene and dienophile,
whereas partnering of this 1,4-oxazin-2-one with methyl
acrylate (MA) represents a “mismatch”.
Calculations were performed using Gaussian 01.25 All
transition structures were initially optimized with AM126,27
and then reoptimized using B3LYP/6-31G*.28 Frequency
calculations were carried out at all computed B3LYP/
6-31G* transition structures. Each was shown to have
only one vibrational mode with an imaginary frequency.
These were animated to confirm that they were transition
structures for the reactions being investigated. This DFT
method (model chemistry) has been previously shown by
Houk to be a reliable method for predicting the regio-
and stereoselectivity of the cycloaddition of Danishefsky’s
diene with acrylonitrile29 and by us to be a reliable
method for predicting the regio- and stereoselectivity of
the cycloadditions of halogen-substituted 2(H)-pyran-2-
ones.12
The calculated relative energies of transition states
leading to the four possible cycloadducts from the reaction
of each of the oxazin-2-ones with methyl acrylate (MA)
and methyl vinyl ether (MVE), along with the yields of
each cycloadduct obtained experimentally, are shown in
Table 4 (yields of cycloaddition with butyl vinyl ether
were used in place of that for methyl vinyl ether). Table
4 also contains information on the distance between the
bond-forming atoms in diene and dienophile in each case.
This information indicates the degree of asynchronicity
in the bond formation during the Diels-Alder cycload-
dition and is further evidence in support of the lack of
significant change in electron demand of the cycloaddi-
tions.
The computational data can be used to proximately
predict the ratio of the cycloadducts obtained in these
reactions. We can expect that of the four transition states,
the ones with the lower energy are likely to be favored
and cycloadducts resulting from them will be observed
in larger proportion in the final product mixture. There-
fore, one expects a correlation between the calculated
energy of the four transition states and the yield of the
four cycloadducts.
Computational Results and Discussion
As discussed earlier, 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones undergo
cycloaddition with dienophiles regardless of their elec-
tronic demand. In this sense, 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones
appear to be 2-azadiene analogues of the well-established
halo substituted 2(H)-pyran-2-ones. We had previously
shown that the regio- and stereochemical outcome of the
cycloadditions of 2(H)-pyran-2-one can be predicted com-
putationally.12 We decided to carry out a similar inves-
tigation of 2(H)-1,4-oxazin-2-ones in order to understand
and predict the regio and stereoselectivity in their
cycloadditions. Hence, we carried out a range of calcula-
tions on the four transition states (TS) leading to the four
possible stereoisomers, namely the 8-endo, the 7-endo,
the 8-exo, and the 7-exo cycloadducts, in the cycloaddi-
tions of 3,5-dichloro-6-methyl-1,4-oxazin-2-one, 1, and
5-chloro-3-methoxy-6-methyl-1,4-oxazin-2-one, 15, with
methyl acrylate (MA) and methyl vinyl ether (MVE).
Methyl vinyl ether was chosen as a typical electron-rich
dienophile for computations. Although this was not one
of the dienophiles used in the cycloaddition experiments,
we are confident that the results obtained computation-
ally for MVE can be used for comparison with results
obtained experimentally for closely related butyl vinyl
As can be seen from the tables, the theory is partially
successful in its predictions. For the cycloadditions of the
(25) Gaussian 01, Development Version (Revision B.01): Frisch, M.
J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Kudin,
K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Stratmann, R. E.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Iyengar,
S.; Petersson, G. A.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Nakatsuji, H.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J.; Ayala, P. Y.;
Morokuma, K.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels,
A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.;
Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.;
Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian,
Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
(26) Dewar, M. J. S., Zoebisch, E. G. THEOCHEM 1988, 41, 1.
(27) Dewar, M. J. S., Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart J. J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902.
(28) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(29) Ujaque, G.; Norton, J. E.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
7179.
(24) Afarinkia, K.; Bahar A.; Neuss, J. Synlett 2003, 2341.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 23, 2005 9535