Table 1. Reduction of [(S)R]-â-ketosulfoxide 2 with Hydrides
Table 2. Reactions of 8a, 10, 7a, and 9 with AlMe3
entry
enoate
product
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
8a (X ) : ; R1 ) H)
10 (X ) O; R1 ) H)
7a (X ) : ; R1 ) TBS)
9 (X ) O; R1dTBS)
11
12
13
14
90
98
96
98
entry
hydride
3a :3b
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ZnCl2/DIBALHa
ZnBr2/DIBALHa
ZnI2/DIBALHa
LiAlH4
NaBH4
Bu4NBH4
Yb(OTf)3/DIBALHa
50:50
67:33
50:50
24:76
36:64
38:72
8:92
62
65
60
41
99
99
96
a A 2 M solution in heptanes (4 equiv) was added to a 0.2 M solution of
enoate 8a, 10, 7a, or 9 in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C.
â-ketosulfoxides reported, a noticeable difference in the
nonequivalence of the methylene hydrogens R to the sul-
foxide for the [R,(S)R]- and [S,(S)R]-epimers has been
observed. For the [R,(S)R]-configuration, the ∆ν value
between these two hydrogens is smaller {∆ν ) 26 Hz in
[R,(S)R]-3b} than in the [S,(S)R]-diastereomer {∆ν ) 81
Hz in [S,(S)R]-3a}.
a DIBALH (1 M in heptane); dr was determined by H NMR from the
crude reaction mixture.
1
[2R,(S)R]-3b by the DIBALH/ZnX2 (X ) Cl, Br, I)3
reduction of â-ketosulfoxide 2 were poorly stereoselective
and led to an almost equimolecular mixture of (2R)- and
(2S)-diastereomers 3a and 3b, respectively (Table 1, entries
1-3).14 The presence of an oxygenated function at C-1 of
the â-keto sulfoxide 2, which could compete with the sulfinyl
oxygen in the chelation with the Zn atom, could be in the
origin of this lack of selectivity.
To improve these results, we checked other hydrides such
as LiAlH4 (Table 1, entry 4), NaBH4 (Table 1, entry 5), and
Bu4NBH4 (Table 1, entry 6). In all cases, the major formation
of [2R,(S)R]-3b was observed, but the diasteromeric ratio
was not in the range of utility. Finally, the treatment of
Compound 3b was transformed into 7b and 8b (Scheme
2) following a reaction sequence similar to that used for the
epimers 7a and 8a shown in Scheme 1. Compound 7b was
obtained diastereomerically pure by chromatographic puri-
fication of the crude resulting from the olefination reaction.
With the desired enoates in hand, we began the study of
their reactions with organometallic reagents in order to
determine the preference of the different reagents for 1,2-
and 1,4-additions. We first tried the reaction of 8a with
BrMgMe (4 equiv in ether) and observed the formation of a
(50:50) mixture of distereomeric 1,4-addition products at 0
°C and a mixture of 1,2- and 1,4-addition products at room
temperature. Surprisingly, when a CH2Cl2 solution of 8a was
added over a 2 M solution of AlMe3 in heptane (4 equiv),
the clean formation of the tertiary carbinol [3E,5S,(S)R]-11
(90% isolated yield) (Table 2, entry 1), resulting from a
double addition on the ester group, was observed. The
hydroxy sulfone 10 behaves similarly under the same
conditions. The tertiary carbinol 12, resulting from the
exclusive addition of the AlMe3 to the ester groups, was
isolated in a 98% yield.
To know if the free OH had an essential role in these
reactions, the TBS-protected sulfoxide 7a and sulfone 9 were
submitted to reaction with AlMe3. Again, the corresponding
tertiary carbinols 13 and 14 were formed in 96 and 98%
yield, respectively. The reactivity shown by the aluminum
reagent with the ester groups was rather surprising due to
the inertness of such a functional group to these organome-
tallic derivatives. The (4R)-epimeric enoate [2E,4R,(S)R]-
8b did not react under the conditions where 8a evolved in
17 h. Previous work had shown that ordinary esters are inert
to AlMe3 and reaction occurred only with AlMe3/DMEDA
complex in refluxing toluene.17 The reactivity of the ester
15
â-ketosulfoxide 2 with Yb(OTf)3 and DIBALH (Table 1,
entry 7) afforded a mixture of [2R,(S)R]-3b and its epimer
in a 3b/3a ratio of 92:8. The epimers could not be separated
at this stage since the mixture was isolated in a 96% yield
by flash column chromatography.
The absolute configuration at the hydroxylic carbons of
epimeric carbinols 3 could be deduced not only from the
mechanism already proposed for the reduction of such
â-ketosulfoxides3,16 but also from the H NMR spectra of
1
the products. From the numerous examples of reduction of
(11) Recent reviews: Na´jera, C.; Sansano, J. M. Rec. Res. DeV. Org.
Chem. 1998, 2, Part 2, 637-683.
(12) Solladie´, G.; Hutt, J.; Girardin, A. Synthesis 1987, 173.
(13) [(S)S]-Enantiomer had been synthesized from (-)-[(S)S]-methyl-
p-tolylsulfoxide: Solladie´, G.; Adamy, M.; Colobert, F. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 4369-4373.
1
(14) Determined by H NMR from the crude reaction mixture.
(15) (a) Solladie´, G.; Colobert, F.; Samny, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 1227-1228. (b) Solladie´, G.; Hanquet, G.; Izzo, I.; Crumbie, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3071-3074. (c) Solladie´, G.; Hanquet, G.;
Rolland, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5847-5850.
(16) (a) Solladie´, G.; Demailly, G.; Greck, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985,
26, 435-438. (b) Solladie´, G.; Demailly, G.; Greck, C. J. Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 1552-1554. (c) Solladie´, G.; Frechou, C.; Demailly, G.; Greck, C. J.
Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1912-1914. (d) Solladie´-Cavallo, A.; Suffert, J.;
Adib, A.; Solladie´, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6649-6652. (e) Solladie´,
G.; Rubio, A.; Carren˜o, M. C.; Garc´ıa-Ruano, J. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1990, 1, 187-198.
(17) Chung, E. A.; Cho, C.-W.; Ahn, K. H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
7590-7591.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 20, 2004
3539