efficiency in heterogeneous alkyne activation. Thus, we
found that Au/TiO2 catalyzes the cycloisomerization of
aryl propargyl ethers into (2H)-chromenes.8 Byproducts
from oxidative dimerization promoted by molecular oxy-
gen were also formed. It was postulated that formation
of (2H)-chromenes is catalyzed by positively charged Au
species, whereas dimeric 2H,20H-3,30-bichromenes derive
via a redox AuIIIꢀAuI catalytic cycle. Although Au/CeO2
have reported to be inactive against 1,6-enyne cyclization,9
we were prompted to test Au/TiO2 as a catalyst for
such a purpose and develop the first heterogeneous gold-
catalyzed approach in this well-studied under homoge-
neous conditions reaction.
revealed by GC-MS analysis. Diene 5a is produced in the
PtCl2-catalyzed cyclization of 5.15 Under homogeneous
Au(I)-conditions 5a was seen only if the reaction solvent is
polar DMSO,11 while in DCM 5b (a minor product under
our reaction conditions) is exclusively formed.
Scheme 1. Cyclization of Enynes 1ꢀ5a Catalyzed by Au/TiO2
b,c
To our delight, gold nanoparticles (1.2% mol in overall
Au content) catalyze in high yields the cyclization of a
series of 1,6-enynes in refluxing DCE, which provides once
more proof for the existence of ionic gold species on
Au/TiO2 as the potent catalytic sites. However, on many
occasions the observed product selectivity differs signifi-
cantly from that under homogeneous Au(I) conditions.
The initial examples using 1,6-enynes bearing a simple
propargylmoietyarepresentedinScheme1.Parentenyne1
provides exclusively the five-membered ring carbocycle 1a
in 94% isolated yield. This selectivity resembles its Pd(II)-,
Pt(II)-, Ir(I)-, In(III)-, or Ru(II)-catalyzed cyclization10
in contradiction to homogeneous Au(I)-catalysis,11 which
provides primarily a six-membered ring cyclization prod-
uct, with 1a being a minor one. For the case of 2, diene 2a
is formed as occurs under homogeneous conditions,12
accompanied by ∼5% of 2b. Crotyl-substituted 3 (E/Z =
3/1) not only led primarily to product 3a11 (E/Z ≈ 3/1)
but also formed a minor amount (12%) of the six-
membered 3b (Z/E ≈ 3/1). Product 3b had been reported
as a minor one in the In-catalyzed cyclization of 310d and
as major in the Ru-catalyzed13 cyclization. Cinnamyl-
substituted 4 decomposes under the reaction conditions
suffering oxidative cleavage of the double bond. Enyne 5
mainly affords the nonconjugated diene 5a (65% relative
yield), conjugated diene 5b (5%), a minor fraction of
two six-membered ring isomers 5c and 5d (total 23%),
oxidative dimerization product 5e14 (5%) as an equimolar
mixture of diastereomers (meso and dl), and a small
fraction (∼2%) of two other dimers (isomeric to 5e) as
a Z = C(COOMe)2. b1.2 mol % of catalyst. cDCE, 70 °C.
For further exploration we examined the cyclization of
internal enynes 6ꢀ11 (Scheme 2). Generally, their reaction
rates are lower; however with one exception high yields
were obtained. The cyclization of 6 provides a striking
difference among homogeneous and heterogeneous gold
catalysis. In the presence of Au/TiO2, diene 6a (single
cleavage product) is exclusively formed, in contrast to
homogeneous Au(I)-conditions, where the isomeric (E)-
3a is formed via a double cleavage rearrangement
mechanism.16 An identical cyclization mode was found
in the case of 7 which selectively provides the acid-sensitive
carbocycle 7a in 75% yield. Enyne 8 affords primarily a
mixture of five-membered ring allene 8a (major), the six-
membered nonconjugated diene 8b (minor), and a mixture
of three dimeric products (GC-MS) in an approximately
6% relative ratio, which could not be separated and
characterized properly. The formation of allenes in the
gold-catalyzed cyclization of some benzyl-substituted
(8) Efe, C.; Lykakis, I. N.; Stratakis, M. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47,
803.
(9) Garcia-Mota, M.; Cabello, N.; Maseras, F.; Echavarren, A. M.;
Perez-Ramirez, J.; Lopez, N. ChemPhysChem. 2008, 9, 1624.
(10) (a) Trost, B. M.; Tanoury, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
1636. (b) Chatani, N.; Furukawa, N.; Sakurai, H.; Murai, S. Organo-
metallics 1996, 15, 901. (c) Chatani, N.; Inoue, H.; Morimoto, T.; Muto,
T.; Murai, S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4433. (d) Miyanohana, Y.; Chatani,
N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2155. (e) Chatani, N.; Morimoto, T.; Muto, T.;
Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6049.
(11) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Paz Munoz, M.; Lopez, S.; Jimenez-
Nunez, E.; Nevado, C.; Herrero-Gomez, E.; Raducan, M.; Echavarren,
A. M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1677.
(12) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Paz Munoz, M.; Bunuel, E.; Nevado, C.;
Cardenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
2402.
(15) Mendez, M.; Paz Munoz, M.; Nevado, C.; Cardenas, D. J.;
Echavarren, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10511.
(16) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Lopez, S.; Paz Munoz, M.; Cardenas,
D. J.; Bunuel, E.; Nevado, C.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 6146.
(13) Faller, J. W.; Fontaine, P. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691,
1912.
(14) Porcel, S.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
2672.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012
2957