5740
R. D. Hubbard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5738–5740
Table 2
oral exposure (DNAUC = 61 ng h/mL/mg/kg) to complement its
Comparison of enzyme and cellular potency
potency. Secondary carbamates were also explored. The dimethyl
amino carbamate 15h demonstrated potent inhibition in the en-
zyme and cell assays, displayed reduced covalent modification as
compared with 7 or 15g, and also showed good oral exposure in
the mouse (DNAUC = 93 ng h/mL/kg). However, the morpholine
analog 15i showed somewhat reduced potency compared with
15g, particularly on the EGFR enzyme and the HN5 (EGFR over-
expressing) cell line. The amine attached sulfonamide and carba-
mate, 15j and 15k, respectively, were also found to be potent in
the primary assays and were more reactive in the covalent mod-
ification assay than many of the other C4-substituted analogs.
In conclusion, we describe novel acetylenic pyrrolidine thie-
no[3,2-d]pyrimidines that are potent, selective dual EGFR/ErbB-2
enzyme inhibitors with good anti-proliferative activity against
EGFR and ErbB-2 overexpressing tumor lines. In addition, we have
presented our SAR findings around both the pyrrolidine nitrogen
and the C4-substituent. The C4-carbamoyl analog 15g was found
to have desirable enzyme and cell potency while displaying good
mouse oral PK. In addition, the secondary carbamate 15h was
found to be among the most potent molecules in the series and
also demonstrated exposure from an oral dose in the mouse. On
the basis of these encouraging results, the SAR of C4-carbamates
has been further developed and the pre-clinical developability of
these compounds has been probed. The results will be disclosed
in a future communication.
a,b,c
a
Analog
R=
Enzyme IC50
EGFRc
(nM)
Cellular IC50 (nM)
ErbB-2
HN5
BT474
15a
15b
15c
–OH
–OEt
–OSO2CH3
14 (ND)d
115 (21%)
81 (ND)
11
98
40
160
99
380
39
45
86
O
15d
15e
63 (0%)
90
52
18
34
CH3
Et
O
O
141 (0%)
135
200
O
O
O
15f
15g
15h
15i
15j
50 (17%)
32 (24%)
28 (11%)
65 (5%)
20
43
68
84
58
95
28
30
30
30
CH3
O
N
H
O
O
Et
O
O
N
H
CH3
100
160
N
CH3
O
O
O
N
O
References and notes
60 (41%)
50 (26%)
78
87
113
127
40
42
Et
N
H
O
1. Seymour, L. K. Curr. Drug Targets 2001, 2, 117.
2. Yarden, Y. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37, S3.
3. Rowinsky, E. K. Annu. Rev. Med. 2004, 55, 433.
4. Dumas, J. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2001, 4, 378.
5. Baker, A. J.; Gibson, K. H.; Grudy, W.; Godfrey, A. A.; Barlow, J. J.; Healy, M. P.;
Woodburn, J. R.; Ashton, S. E.; Curry, B. J.; Scarlett, L.; Henthorn, L.; Richards, L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1191.
6. Bonomi, P. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2003, 3, 367.
7. Rusnak, D. W.; Lackey, K. E.; Wood, E. R.; Alligood, K. J.; Rhodes, N.; Knight, W.
B.; Gilmer, T. M. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2001, 1, 85–94.
15k
–NHSO2Et
Average values P2.
a
b
c
Number in parentheses is % covalent modification of EGFR after 3 h.
See footnote b in Table 1.
d
ND, not determined.
8. Wood, E. R.; Trusdale, A. T.; McDonald, O. B.; Yuan, D.; Hassell, A.; Dickerson, S.
H.; Ellis, B.; Pennisi, C.; Horne, E.; Lackey, K.; Alligood, K. J.; Rusnak, D. W.;
Gilmer, T. M.; Shewchuk, L. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6652.
9. Allen, L. F.; Eiseman, I. A.; Fry, D. W.; Lenehan, P. F. Semin. Oncol. 2003, 30,
65.
10. In addition to canertinib, related irreversible agents, have also been disclosed;
see (a) Rabindran, S. K.; Discafani, C. M.; Rosfjord, E. C.; Baxter, M.; Floyd, M. B.;
Golas, J.; Hallett, W. A.; Johnson, B. D.; Nilakantan, R.; Overbeek, E.; Reich, M. F.;
Shen, R.; Shi, X.; Tsou, H.-R.; Wang, Y.-F.; Wissner, A. Cancer Res. 2004, 64,
3958; (b) Erlichman, C.; Hidalgo, M.; Boni, J. P.; Martins, P.; Quinn, S. E.;
Zacharchuk, C.; Amorusi, P.; Adjei, A. A.; Rowinsky, E. K. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24,
2252.
priate alkyl halide provided 14b. Mesylation of 14a with MsCl and
Et3N afforded sulfonate 14c. The hydroxyl moiety was also function-
alized with either acid chlorides or chloroformates affording alkynes
14d and 14e, respectively. Heating 14a with an isocyanate in pres-
ence of DMAP yielded carbamates 14f–i. In addition to oxygen-
based functional groups, we also explored other substituents at C4
of the pyrrolidine. Mesylation of the 4R antipode of 14a19 with MsCl
and Et3N afforded mesylate 17, and subsequent reaction with NaN3
followed by a Staudinger reduction provided a crude aminopyrrol-
idine. This aminopyrrolidine was treated with an isocyanate to give
carbamate 14j, or with methanesulfonyl chloride to yield the sulfon-
amide 14k. The individual functionalized pyrrolidine alkynes 14a–k
were then coupled under Sonogashira reaction conditions with bro-
mide 4. Deprotection of the BOC-group with TFA afforded the de-
sired analogs (15a–15k).
The initial lead for this SAR endeavor, 15a (R = (R)-OH), was
quite potent relative to 7 on both the enzyme and on trans-
formed cell lines, particularly the ErbB-2 overexpressing BT474
line (Table 2); unfortunately, the murine oral exposure was quite
low (DNAUC = 9 ng h/mL/mg/kg). A simple alkyl ether 15b man-
aged to retain cellular activity, but also suffered from poor oral
exposure. A survey of other functionalities such as sulfonate
(15c), ester (15d), or carbonate (15e), also provided analogs with
generally comparable cellular activity to 15a. Carbamate 15f re-
tained enzyme and cell activity but possessed only marginally
better oral exposure (DNAUC = 18 ng h/mL/mg/kg). In contrast,
the ethyl carbamate 15g provided significantly increased mouse
11. Fry, D. W. Anticancer Drug Des. 2000, 15, 3.
12. Wood, E. R.; Shewchuk, L. M.; Ellis, B.; Brignola, P.; Brashear, R. L.; Caferro, T. R.;
Dickerson, S. D.; Dickson, H. D.; Donaldson, K. H.; Gaul, M.; Griffin, R. J.; Hassell,
A. M.; Keith, B.; Mullin, R.; Petrov, K. G.; Reno, M. J.; Rusnak, D. W.; Tadepalli, S.
M.; Ulrich, J. C.; Wagner, C. D.; Vanderwall, D. E.; Waterson, A. G.; Williams, J.
D.; White, W. L.; Uehling, D. E. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 2773.
13. Trybulski, E. J.; Kramss, R. H.; Mangano, R. M.; Rusinko, A. J. Med. Chem. 1990,
33, 3190.
14. Caferro, T.R.; Chamberlain, S.D.; Donaldson, K.H.; Harris, P.A.; Gaul, M.D.;
Uehling, D.E.; Vanderwall, D.E. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2003053446 A1; 2003.
15. The modification data was acquired using EGFR only using methods described
in Ref. 12.
reactivity.
These analogs have not been assayed versus ErbB-2 for potential
16. Furthermore, these thienopyrimidine-based analogs (7–12, 15a–15k) were
found to be selective for the transformed cell lines versus a control human
foreskin fibroblast cell line (>1
Ref. 7.
lM IC50). Methods of testing are described in
17. Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561.
18. Dickson, H. D.; Smith, S. C.; Hinkle, K. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5597.
19. Hydroxyl pyrrolidine 16 was constructed using similar methods used for the
conversion of 13–14a, simply starting with the commercially available N-BOC-
trans-4-hydroxy-D-proline methyl ester. A full examination of the possible
diastereomers and the associated synthetic details will be disclosed in a future
communication.