organocuprates to alkynes,8 asymmetric addition of aryl
boronic acids to unsaturated esters,9 and Heck coupling of
aryl halides with acrylates.10 The alkyne substrates can be
difficult to prepare, and both other methods provide access
to only the (E)-isomer.
Although it was known that the selectivity of â-keto ester
enolization could be controlled by the choice of base and/or
solvent,11,12 to our knowledge there are no reports of the
selective enolization of γ-amino â-keto esters.13 It was
uncertain what effect, if any, an adjacent NH group would
have on the selectivity of the enolization step. Herein, we
describe the stereoselective formation of both the (Z)- and
(E)-γ-amino R,â-unsaturated esters in three steps from
N-protected glycine derivatives. In this letter, we also
highlight the use of enol tosylates as a practical alternative
to enol triflates.
research groups have circumvented stability issues of triflates
by preparing the nonaflate equivalents; however, these
compounds were used in cross-coupling reactions with
organozinc reagents17 or under Stille coupling conditions.13
We desired a process that did not require a separate
transmetalation step or involve the use of tin reagents.
Therefore, we turned our attention toward the stereoselective
preparation of enol tosylates and their potential use as cross-
coupling partners with readily available aryl boronic acids.
While cross-coupling reactions of enol tosylates are much
less developed and under-utilized relative to enol triflates,
there has been much recent interest in the transition metal-
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of aryl and vinyl tosy-
lates.18
Although the (Z)-enol tosylate 3 is selectively formed
under kinetic conditions and Ts2O is much less reactive than
Tf2O, treatment of 1b with LHMDS followed by Ts2O
addition afforded ∼20:1 ratio of the (Z)-:(E)-isomers and a
67% assay yield.19 An optimization study identified LDA
as the ideal base for deprotonation of 1b, while n-BuLi is
optimal for 1a (20:1, 80% assay yield). Use of NaHMDS
degrades the selectivity for formation of (Z)-isomer, while
KHMDS reverses the selectivity, resulting in the formation
of the (E)-isomer as the major product (Table 1). If KHMDS
Scheme 1
Table 1. Examination of Various Bases on the Formation of
Enol Tosylates from â-Keto Ester 1b
The requisite â-keto esters were prepared from N-protected
glycine derivatives via a Masamune homologation protocol
in good yield.2,14 Our initial focus was on the development
of an enolization process for the stereoselective preparation
of enol triflates and the subsequent cross-coupling of these
substrates to aryl boronic acids. The selective formation of
the (Z)-enol triflate15 from the â-keto ester was achieved in
86% isolated yield with 1.1 equiv of n-BuLi in MTBE at
-60 °C. Investigation of the subsequent Suzuki-Miyaura
coupling step indicated that the enol triflate was unstable to
the reaction conditions. Substrate decomposition was reduced
in the presence of LiBr and LiCl,16 but the yields were
typically less than 50% and difficult to reproduce. Other
base
solvent
3b:4b
% assay yielda
LHMDSb
LHMDSb
n-BuLib
LDAb
NaHMDSb
KHMDSb
KHMDSb,c
Et3Nd
THF
24:1
7:1
30:1
12:1
2:1
1:7
16:1
1:25
63
23
65
93
52
72
46
83
THF/30 mol % DMF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
CH2Cl2
(6) Song, Y.; Clizbe, L.; Bhakta, C.; Teng, W.; Li, W.; Wu, Y.; Jia, Z.
J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, L. Doughan, B.; Su, T.; Kanter, J.; Woolfrey, J.; Wong,
P.; Huang, B.; Tran, K.; Sinha, U.; Park, G.; Reed, A.; Malinowski, J.;
Hollenbach, S.; Scarborough, R. M.; Zhu, B. Bio. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002,
12, 1511-1515.
a Assay yield determined by HPLC analysis of the reaction mixture with
comparison to a purified standard. b Reaction conditions: keto ester 1b (200
mg, 0.85 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of THF cooled to -50 °C; the
reaction was aged for 3 h after base (1.1 equiv) addition, and then Ts2O
(1.1 equiv) was added and the reaction allowed to warm to room
temperature. c LiBr (1 equiv) was added. d Reaction conditions: keto ester
1b (7.88 g, 32.1 mmol) and Ts2O (1.02 equiv) in 100 mL CH2Cl2 at 0 °C
were added followed by Et3N, and the reaction was allowed to warm to
room temperature.
(7) Thakur, V. V.; Nikalje, M. D.; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 581-586.
(8) Dieter, R. K.; Lu, K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 847-855. Dieter, R.
K.; Lu, K.; Velu, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8715-8724.
(9) Meyer, O.; Becht, J.; Helmchen, G. Synlett 2003, 10, 1539-1541.
(10) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6989-7000.
(11) Harris, F. L.; Weiler, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1333-1336.
Gebauer, O.; Bru¨ckner, R. Synthesis 2000, 4, 588-602.
(12) Shao, Y.; Eummer, J. T.; Gibbs, R. A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 627-
630.
(13) Example of selective enolization of a trisubstituted amino keto
ester: Bo¨sche, U.; Nubbemeyer, U. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6883-6904.
(14) Jones, R. C. F.; Bhalay, G.; Carter, P. A.; Duller, K. A. M.; Dunn,
S. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 7, 765-776.
(15) Geometry was assigned on the basis of NOE studies, and the (E)-
isomer was not observed by HPLC in the reaction mixture.
is used as the base in the presence of 1 equiv of LiBr, good
selectivity for the formation of the (Z)-isomer is maintained,
but the yield is diminished. These results are consistent with
a substantial counterion effect on the reaction. We were also
interested in preparing the (E)-enol tosylate isomer. Although
literature reports describe the use of a strong base in polar
216
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005