tig olefination followed by reduction.2 Herein we report that
alternative routes to the same synthetic intermediates de-
signed around a hydrocarbon oxidation approach involving
DMSO/Pd(OAc)2/BQ allylic oxidation are uniformly more
efficient on the basis of number of FGMs, overall number
of steps, and overall yield (when available).
A representative example of the general strategy used to
access functionalized linear (E)-allylic alcohols is the
reported synthesis of key (E)-allylic alcohol intermediate
(+)-4 of the miyakolide C6-C13 fragment (Scheme 2).3a The
aldol methodology (Scheme 2).3b After reductive auxiliary
cleavage and acetonide formation, the (E)-allylic alcohol unit
was deprotected to yield the targeted intermediate (+)-4. This
route required a total of 11 steps, 7 of which can be attributed
to FGMs. An alternative approach to (+)-4 was made
possible by our allylic oxidation methodology. Monooxy-
genated substrate 5 was converted into the corresponding
aldehyde and then transformed into the desired acetonide 7
using the aforementioned aldol sequence. The hydrocarbon
appendage of 7 was directly transformed into the requisite
linear (E)-allylic alcohol unit via DMSO/Pd(OAc)2/BQ allylic
oxidation (Scheme 2). Deacetylation generated (+)-4 in a
total of six steps, only two of which are FGMs, and 26%
overall yield. Notably, the acid-labile acetonide functionality
was tolerant of our mildly acidic allylic oxidation conditions.
Key to the relative brevity of our route was the ability to
use a hydrocarbon appendage, as opposed to an oxygenated
one, as a direct precursor to the target oxygenated func-
tionality.
Scheme 2. Hydrocarbon Oxidation Route vs C-C
Bond-Forming Route to (E)-Allylic Alcohol Intermediate (+)-4
of Miyakolide C6-C13 Fragment
In a similar vein, the reported synthesis of macrocycliza-
tion substrate 104 began with bis-oxygenated precursor 1,3-
propanediol 8. Multiple protective group and oxidation state
manipulations were used to enable installation of the (E)-
allylic acetate via a HWE/reduction sequence followed by
the sensitive â-sulfonyl acetate functionality via esterification.
This route proceeds in eight steps and 21% overall yield.
Four of these steps involve FGMs. By way of contrast,
starting from a monooxygenated precursor, 4-penten-1-ol 11,
we installed the â-sulfonyl acetate ester first and directly
converted the hydrocarbon appendage to the requisite (E)-
allylic acetate in three steps with no FGMs and in 57%
overall yield (Scheme 3). It is significant to note the
Scheme 3. Hydrocarbon Oxidation Route vs C-C
Bond-Forming Route to (E)-Allylic Acetate Intermediate 10 of a
Macrolide Precursor
a Conditions: Propionic acid (1R,2S)-2-[N-benzyl-N-(mesit-
ylenesulfonyl)-amino]-1-phenyl-1-propyl ester (1.2 equiv), Cy2BOTf
(2.3 equiv), NEt3 (2.8 equiv), -78 °C, 3 h; 5-hexenal, -78 °C for
b
3 h f 0 °C for 1 h, 71% (two steps). BQ ) Benzoquinone.
two ends of a symmetric, bis-oxygenated starting material,
1,4-butanediol 1, were differentially functionalized via a
series of reactions involving monoprotection, oxidation,
HWE olefination, reduction, and orthogonal protection to
generate the requisite (E)-allylic alcohol unit. The initially
protected hydroxyl was unmasked and oxidized to aldehyde
3, enabling the implementation of Masamune’s anti-selective
(2) (a) The Wittig-type reactions of aliphatic aldehydes proceed with
similar E/Z selectivities: Kelly, S. E. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 1, p 729.
(b) Cross-metathesis reactions of R-olefins with allylic alcohol equivalents
proceed with moderate stereoselectivities (∼4.5:1 E/Z). Chatterjee, A. K.;
Choi, T. L.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
11360.
(3) (a) Yoshimitsu, T.; Song, J. J.; Wang, G.-Q.; Masamune, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 8978. (b) Personal communication with Professor Takehiko
Yoshimitsu.
compatibility of the sensitive â-sulfonyl acetate ester func-
tionality with our allylic oxidation methodology in contrast
(4) Trost, B. M.; Verhoeven, T. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4743.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005
224