3
Niu et al. Sci China Chem
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions
a)
bar was charged with 4-alkyl DHP 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.),
alkene 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv., if solid) and transferred to
glovebox to add LiOtBu (64.0 mg, 0.8 mmol, 4.0 equiv.).
The tube was then evacuated and back-filled with CO2 for
three times. Subsequently, 2 (if liquid) and dimethyl sulf-
oxide (DMSO) (3.0 mL) were added under CO2 atmosphere.
The reaction was stirred in water bath and irradiated with a
30 W blue light-emitting diode (LED) lamp (3 cm away,
with a cooling fan to keep the reaction temperature at
25–30 °C) for 12 h. The resulting mixture was quenched by
2 mL of 2N HCl (aq.), 4 mL of H2O and diluted with 4 mL of
EtOAc and then stirred for 10 min and extracted by EtOAc
for 4 times and the combined organic phases were con-
centrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel
flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2 as eluent) to give the
pure desired alkylative carboxylation product 3.
b)
c)
Entry
1
Alteration from standard conditions
Yield
56%
NaOtBu (2.5 equiv.) instead of LiOtBu,
NMP instead of DMSO
d)
2
3
No change
KOtBu instead of LiOtBu
NaOtBu instead of LiOtBu
CsF instead of LiOtBu
88% (96%)
79%
4
70%
5
82%
6
0.5 mol% of fac-Ir(ppy)3 as additive
0.5 mol% of 4CzIPN as additive
LiOtBu (3 equiv.) instead of (4 equiv.)
LiOtBu (2 equiv.) instead of (4 equiv.)
LiOtBu (1 equiv.) instead of (4 equiv.)
No light
89%
7
92%
d)
8
(90%)
d)
9
(89%)
d)
10
11
12
13
(55%)
3 Results and discussion
e)
n.d.
No LiOtBu
n.d.
As the cyclohexyl-carboxylative product was isolated along
with the formation of hydrocyclohexylation product in 33%
NMR yield (Eq. (1)), we tried to optimize the reaction effi-
ciency. We initiated the study by employing the reaction with
4-Cy-DHP 1a and 4-vinyl-1,1′-biphenyl 2a as model sub-
strates under atmospheric pressure of CO2 by using NaOtBu
as base. An isolated yield of 56% was achieved (Table 1,
entry 1). After systematic investigation (Please see more
to get the desired product 3aa in 88% yield in the presence of
4 equiv. of LiOtBu as the base and DMSO as solvent (entry
2). LiOtBu might not only serve as a base but also a reagent
for CO2 enrichment in reaction mixture [50,51]. The for-
mation of hydrocyclohexylation product 3aa′ (7% isolated
yield) was obviously suppressed. Other bases, such as KO
N2 instead of CO2
n.d.
a) Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), LiOtBu
(0.8 mmol), DMSO (3.0 mL), 1 atm of CO2, 30 W blue LEDs, room
temperature (rt), 12 h. b) DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide, NMP=1-methylpyr-
rolidin-2-one, ppy=2-phenylpyridine. c) Yields were isolated yields. d)
Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) yields were given in
parentheses with 100 μL anisole as an internal standard. e) n.d.=not de-
tected. Diethyl 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate 4 was observed as
byproduct.
could also be subject to this reaction system, affording the
corresponding products (3ea, 3fa) in excellent yields. To our
delight, when testing tertiary alkyl-DHPs, we successfully
isolated the difunctionalizing products (3ga–3ha) in good
yields. Importantly, in spite of the instability of primary alkyl
radical, 32% yield of product 3ia could also be isolated when
tBu, NaOtBu and CsF, were also examined to give lower
n
testing Pr-DHPs as radical precursor. These interesting re-
yields (Table 1, entries 3–5). External photocatalysts, such as
sults are also a supplement for our recently reported alky-
lative carboxylation of alkenes via CO2 recycling [31], in
which unstablized secondary alkyl radical precursors per-
formed in a mediocre manner.
fac-Ir(ppy)3
and
2,4,5,6-tetra(9H-carbazol-9-yl)iso-
phthalonitrile (4CzIPN) slightly promoted this reaction
(Table 1, entries 6 and 7). Besides, when we decreased the
amount of LiOtBu, a slightly lower yields for product 3aa
were obtained. Therefore, although we used 4 equiv. of
LiOtBu to achieve the best yields, it is also fine to use less
LiOtBu in applications (Table 1, entries 8–10). A series of
control experiments revealed that CO2, visible light, and base
all were essential for this transformation (Table 1, entries 11–
13).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we investigated the
alkyl-DHPs with secondary or tertiary alkyl groups were
compatible in this reaction system. Several secondary alkyl-
DHPs gave the corresponding products in excellent yields
(3aa–3da). N-Cbz protected α-amino-DHP and α-oxo-DHP
To extend the scope of this reaction, we further evaluated
various alkenes for the reaction with Cy-DHPs under 1 atm
bearing EWGs (e.g., 3ab–3ae) at para position showed
better reactivity than those with electron-neutral (e.g., 3af–
3ag) or electron-donating groups (EDGs, e.g., 3ah–3aj).
This phenomenon might arise from the balance of stereo-
electronic effect at the benzylic position, allowing facile al-
kyl radical addition to alkenes and SET reduction of benzyl
radicals to the benzylic carbanions. Notably, styrenes bearing
C–Cl bond (3af, 3al) were also amenable to this reaction for
the generation of chlorinated products, which was of po-
tential for application in coupling reactions. Steric hindrance