TABLE 2. Synthesis of 3-Substituted 4-Fluorobenzoic
Acidsa,b
SCHEME 2
entry
Add
EX/E
products (%)
1
2
N
R
N
R
N
N
R
R
R
R
I2/I
I2/I
Me2S2/MeS
Me2S2/MeS
D2O/Dc
CO2/CO2H
C2Cl6/Cl
C2Br2Cl4/Br
PhCHO/PhCH(OH)
Me3SiCl/Me3Sid
39 [9], 47 (20*) [17]
83 (56*) [9], 13 [17]
41 [10], 42 (10*) [18]
89 (56*) [10], 8 [18]
86 [11]
3
4
5
6
68* [12]
7
80* [13]
8
65* [14]
9
59* [15]
10
25 (10*) [16]
a Isolated yields (recrystallized or chromatographed) are fol-
lowed by an asterisk (*). b Characterization was done by 1H and
13C NMR and IR spectroscopy and by matching melting points with
those of authentic samples. See the Supporting Information. c The
extent of deuteration was determined by 1H NMR. d In situ quench
technique. LTMP (2.2 equiv) and Me3SiCl (3 equiv) were premixed
prior to addition of 4-fluorobenzoic acid (1a).
addition, entries 2 and 4),15 we hoped to minimize
formation of the species 17 and 18. Indeed, we discovered
that their formation was reduced to 13% and 8%,
respectively, under these conditions.
Compared to 1a, the acidity of the protons adjacent to
chlorine and bromine is weaker. The deprotonation
requires temperatures (∼-50 °C) for which the dianions
3Li-1b and 3Li-1c are not stable.18 LiX is rapidly ejected
forming the transient lithium benzyne-4-carboxylate (6)
which is readily attacked by tetramethylpiperidine
(HTMP) both in the C-3 and C-4 position affording the
anilinium chlorides 7 and 8.3 Compounds 7 and 8 were
isolated from the aqueous layer by chromatography after
acidic workup (HCl, 4 M) (entries 15 and 16). From the
fact that both amino acids 7 and 8 arise from the dianions
3Li-1b,c, it can be deduced that the lithiation of 1b,c is
not site selective.
The established thermodynamic metalation conditions
found in run 13 (Table 1) led to the development of a
synthetically useful reaction. As summarized in Table 2,
treatment of 1a using 6 equiv of LTMP at -50 °C
followed by addition of a variety of electrophiles provided
a direct access to the acids 9-16. Elemental iodine and
dimethyl disulfide quenches (6 equiv) proceeded smoothly,
leading, respectively, to 4-fluoro-3-(iodo/methylthio)ben-
zoic acids 9 and 10 in 39% and 41% yield (entries 1 and
3), along with 4-fluoro-3,5-bis(iodo/methylthio)benzoic
acids 17 (47%) and 18 (42%).
Next we attempted deuteration (D2O) and carboxyla-
tion (CO2) of 1a. In the event, this resulted in the
formation of only the d3 isotopomer 3-deuterio-4-fluo-
robenzoic acid (11) and 4-fluorobenzene-1,3-dioic acid (12)
with no detectable 3,5-bisdeutero-4-fluorobenzoic acid
and 2-fluorobenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (entries 5
and 6, normal addition). Likewise, reaction with hexachlo-
roethane, dibromotetrachloroethane, and benzaldehyde
afforded the monosubstituted products 13-15 exclusively
in good recrystallized yields by reverse addition (entries
7-9). The in situ quench technique,21 in which 4-fluo-
robenzoic acid (1a) was added to a solution containing
LTMP (2.2 equiv) and chlorotrimethylsilane (3 equiv),
gave 4-fluoro-3-(trimethylsilyl)benzoic acid (16) in low
yield. The accompanying degradation products presum-
ably arise from deprotonation of the trimethylsilyl group
of 16 by LTMP.22
The seeming incompatibility of the results obtained can
be resolved through a sequential mechanism involving,
in the case of I2 and Me2S2, the intermediate species 9
and 10, Li salts (Scheme 2). The mechanism would
require that (1) just prior to the addition of I2/Me2S2, the
reaction mixture contains 3Li-1a and four addition
These results suggest the formation of 3Li-1a and 3Li,-
5Li-1a as intermediates (Scheme 2). Unlike aliphatic
dimetalation which has been used extensively in organic
synthesis,19 dimetalation of aromatic compounds has
remained relatively understudied and underutilized.20 By
changing the mode of deprotonation to addition of the
mixture (formed by treatment of 1a with LTMP at -50
°C) to a THF solution of the electrophile (reverse, R,
(19) Review: Thompson, C. M. Dianion Chemistry in Organic
Synthesis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1994.
(20) (a) Wilson, W. D.; Tanious, F. A.; Watson, R. A.; Baron, H. J.;
Strekowska, A.; Harden, D. B.; Srekowski, L. Biochemistry 1989, 28,
1984. (b) Feringa, B. L.; Hulst, R.; Rikers, R.; Brandsma, L. Synthesis
1988, 316. (c) Cabiddu, S.; Contini, L.; Fattuoni, C.; Floris, C.; Gelli,
G. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 9279. (d) Liu, W.; Wise, D. S.; Townsend, L.
B. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4783. (e) Barchrach, S. M.; Chamberlin, A.
C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2111.
(21) (a) Krizan, T. D.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
6155. (b) Marsais, F.; Laperdrix, B.; Gu¨ngo¨r, T.; Mallet, M.; Que´guiner,
G. J. Chem. Res., Miniprint 1982, 2863. (c) Wada, A.; Kanatomo, S.;
Nagai, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 1016.
(22) (a) Brought, P. A.; Fisher, S.; Zhao, B.; Thomas, R. C.; Snieckus,
V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2915. (b) Macdonald, J. E.; Poindexter,
G. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 1851.
(17) (a) Eberson, L. Acta Chem. Scand. 1984, B38, 439. (b) Feeder,
N.; Lawson, Y. G.; Raithby, P. R.; Rawson, J. M.; Steiner, A.; Wood, J.
A.; Woods, A. D.; Wright, D. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4145.
(18) Caster, K. C.; Keck, C. G.; Walls, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
2932.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2005 1503