Davlieva et al.
TABLE 2. Transient UV-Vis Spectra Attendant upon
the Addition of Various Acylium Cations to Different
Aromatic Donors in Dichloromethane Solution
to elucidate the three critical stages (I-III described
above in the Introduction) for Friedel-Crafts acylation.
Stage I: Activation of Acid Chlorides by Lewis
Acids. The preferential and facile coordination at the
carbonyl-oxygen center of acid chlorides by all of the
different Lewis acids, including antimony pentachloride,
gallium trichloride, titanium, and zirconium tetrachlo-
rides used in this study, is established by the consistent
set of X-ray structures presented in Figures 1-3 and
Table 1, independent of whether monomeric or dimeric
Lewis acid moieties are involved.
absorption, λmax (nm)
acylium
CH3CO+
HMB
HEB
PMB
405a
405b
405c
400d
397
no band
no band
(CH3)3CCH2CO+
4-FC6H4CO+
no band
e
no band
400
no band
no band
2,4,6-(CH3)3C6H2CO+
4-CH3C6H4CO+
2,6-F2C6H3CO+
404
The mechanism of the Lewis acid effect on acid chloride
can be gleaned from the scrutiny of the small structural
changes that is allowed by the X-ray structural param-
eters in Table 1 obtained at low (-150 °C) temperatures.24a
Thus upon Lewis acid coordination, all the acid chlorides
suffer significant elongation of the CdO bond from 1.18
to 1.22 Å (av) and shortening of the C-Cl bond from 1.80
to 1.72 Å, together with a slight contraction of the C-C
bond to the aliphatic or aromatic group.24b Such trends
when evaluated on the basis of Pauling’s bond-length/
bond-order relationship25 indicate the increased electron
deficiency that is induced at the carbonyl center by the
Lewis acid coordination is compensated by π-electron
donation from chlorine, resulting in the strengthening of
the C-Cl bond (as well as increased conjugation of the
alkyl/aryl group). This important step leading to the
extensive electron polarization of the acid chloride must
either be separate from or lie prior to the activation of
the C-Cl bond. However, the singular absence of any
crystallographic evidence for the formation of structures
involving Lewis acid coordination to the chlorine center
indicates that the concentration of such an isomeric
adduct is not likely to be mechanistically significant, and
thus relegated to a weak intermediate or a transition-
state structure. This dilemma can be circumvented if the
predominant acyl-chloride complex undergoes a facile
intramolecular (direct) chlorine transfer to the complexed
Lewis acid moiety, e.g.,
400
395
a In dichloromethane at -70 °C, with acylium carbocations
taken as hexafluoroantimonate salts, unless otherwise noted. b In
-
AcCl solution. c In PrNO2 solution. d CH3CO+SbCl6 salt. e Very
weak band appeared at ∼410 nm.
pentamethylbenzene or durene was added under the
same (low-temperature) conditions.21 Such a spectral
behavior accompanying the exposure of different acyl
cations to hexamethylbenzene is strongly reminiscent of
the formation of σ-adducts as benzenium cations with
other cationic electrophiles such as E+ ) H+, CH3+, NO2
,
+
and Br+ summarized recently,22 i.e.,
Although this characteristic absorption band experiences
a noticeable red shift with strong electrophiles such as
E+ ) NO2 and Br+, it will be rather invariant among
+
the HMB adducts of the family of carbon-centered cations
such as E+ ) CH3+, ClCH2+, CH3C+dO, and PhC+dO,
which are unlikely to exert appreciably different pertur-
bations of the cyclohexadienyl chromophore (especially
at its nodal position) owing to their essential carbo-
cationic character.23
Discussion
The successful isolation of reactive intermediates in
crystalline form for X-ray analysis must be reconciled
with the mechanism of the prototypical electrophilic
substitution of aromatic donors. As such, let us discuss
how the availability of (static) X-ray structures coupled
with transient (UV-vis) spectral analysis can be used
Indeed, this concerted rearrangement is consistent with
the competition between the formation of acylium cation
and the [1:1] complex in eq 5, as shown by its sensitivity
to the acid-chloride structure. For example, the minor
replacement of benzoyl chloride with the slightly more
electron-rich methyl-substituted analogue is sufficient to
lead from the isolation of the crystalline [1:1] complex of
(19) (a) Iverson, D. J.; Hunter, G.; Blount, J. F.; Damewood, J. R.,
Jr.; Mislow, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6073. (b) Hunter, G.;
Iverson, D. J.; Mislow, K.; Blount, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
5942. (c) Hunter, G.; Weakley, T. J. R.; Mislow, K.; Wong, M. G. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1986, 577.
(24) (a) The precision/accuracy of the earlier X-ray diffraction data
collected at room temperature10,12 was limited to 1-1.5 pm (largely
owing to thermal motion) in contrast to 0.3-0.5 pm from our low-
temperature data.11 (b) The bond lengths for CdO and C-Cl of 1.181
and 1.804 Å that were determined in hydrocinnamoyl chloride at -150
°C generally fall in the range (1.16-1.21 and 1.75-1.83 Å) of those in
other acid chlorides typically reported by: Leser, J.; Rabinovich, D.
Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 2253, 2257, 2260, 2264. Fukushima, S.;
Ito, Y.; Hosomi, H.; Ohba, S. Acta Crystallogr. 1998, B54, 895. Sandor,
R. B.; Foxman, B. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6805.
(20) Rathore, R.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9393.
(21) (a) The corresponding arenium cations with E+ ) H+ also have
similar absorptions in this region but are generally blue-shifted by
about 5-10 nm. (b) Mamatyuk, V. I.; Rezvukhin, A. I.; Detsina, A. V.;
Buraev, V. I.; Isaev, I. S.; Koptyug, V. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1973, 9, 2429.
(c) Koptyug, V. A. Top. Curr. Chem. 1984, 122, 1.
(22) Hubig, S. M.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6807.
(23) (a) The relative acceptor properties of the carbocations can be
judged by differences in their reduction potentials.23d See: (b) Wayner,
D. D. M.; McPhee, D. J.; Griller, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 132.
(c) Lund, T.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Jonsson, M.; Larsen, A. G.; Daasbjerg,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12590 and references therein. (d)
See: Mulliken, R. S.; Person, W. B. Molecular Complexes; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 1969.
(25) (a) Pauling, L. Nature of the Chemical Bond; Cornell University
Press: Ithaca, NY, 1960; p 239. (b) According to Pauling, the bond
order (n) is related to the bond distance ri by the following relation-
ship: ni ) exp[2.303(r1 - ri)/K], where r1 is the single-bond distance,
ri is the observed distance, and K is an empirical constant. For the
carbonyl bond, r1 ) 1.43 Å and K ) 0.75. For the bond to alkyl, r1
)
1.48 Å and Κ ) 0.50, which includes the correction for the change in
covalent radius with hybridization.
4018 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 10, 2005