C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Application to the Synthesis of Complex Polypropionates
allenylmetal reagents to formal pentenyl dianion equivalents through
a process that establishes three new stereogenic centers and one
stereodefined trisubstituted olefin. Our preliminary studies have
defined: (1) the stereochemical flexibility of propargylation (5 f
6), (2) a reductive coupling process with chiral aldehydes that is
tolerant of free hydroxylssa factor which is projected to lead to
increased efficiency in polypropionate synthesis, (3) highly regio-
selective reductive coupling reactions of internal alkynes that allow
for convergent assembly of polypropionates, and (4) defined the
levels of diastereoselection in these coupling processes based on
substrate control. Our successes in these areas have provided
impetus for future studies aimed at enhancing levels of diastereo-
selection in this highly regioselective reductive coupling process.
Finally, we have observed that the stereochemical relationship
between the aldehyde and the homopropargylic alcohol influences
levels of regioselection in these complex reductive coupling
reactions. This unusual manifestation of double asymmetric control6
is a facet of these processes that will be explored in more detail in
future studies. Overall, this formal pentenyl dianion-based strategy
is anticipated to expand flexibility in the design of convergent
approaches toward the synthesis of complex polyketide-derived
targets. Progress along these lines will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial support
of this work by Yale University and Eli Lilly & Co. We also thank
Novartis for a graduate fellowship to A.B.B.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
tabulated spectroscopic data for new compounds. This material is
References
(1) Otera, J., Ed. Modern Carbonyl Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
(2) Selected examples of convergent synthesis of polypropionates: (a) Evans,
D. A.; Dart, M. J.; Duffy, J. L.; Rieger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 9073. (b) Gustin, D. J.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Roush, W. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3447. (c) Bode, J. W.; Fraefel, N.; Muri, D.;
Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2082; for reviews see
ref 1.
(3) For a convergent approach to ene-1,5-diols centered about a disubstituted
olefin, see: Flamme, E. M.; Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
13644 and references therein.
(4) Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1841.
(5) Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1307.
(6) Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Petersen, J. S.; Sita, L. R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1.
a Yield reported for major regioisomer. b Regioselectivity determined by
1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. c Major diastereomer is depicted.
d Addition of RCHO at -100 °C. e Deprotonation step not performed.
f Selectivity determined after isolation.
(7) (a) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J.; Kwasigroch, C. A. J. Org. Chem. 1986,
51, 3870. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Masxon, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 630.
See also: (c) Marshall, J. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 31.
(8) Buckle, M. J. C.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2383.
(9) See: Marshall, J. A.; Adams, N. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3812.
(10) Harada, K.; Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3203. See
also: Buchwald, S. L.; Nielsen, R. B. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1047.
(11) (a) Epstein, O. L.; Kulinkovich, O. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1823.
(b) Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7329. For reviews
see. (c) Kulinkovich, O. G.; Meijere, A. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2789. (d)
Sato, F.; Urabe, H.; Okamoto, S. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2835. (e) Marek,
I., Ed. Titanium and Zirconium in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2002.
(12) No products were observed that indicated epimerization of the aldehyde.
(13) For an interesting discussion of regioselectivity in allylic alkylation
reactions based on diastereomeric π-allyl complexes, see: Trost, B. M.;
Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4545.
(14) For examples of directed regioselective reductive coupling reactions with
nickel complexes, see: (a) Mahandru, G. M.; Liu, G.; Montgomery, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3698. (b) Miller, K. M.; Lauanphaisarnnont,
T.; Molinaro, C.; Jamison, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4130. (c)
Miller, K. M.; Jamison, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15342.
(15) Reductive coupling reactions of the homopropargylic alcohol 12 with
aldehydes lacking R- or â-branching were also regioselective (5:1 to 3:1).
See Supporting Information.
the Felkin products (generally g2:1).12 Interestingly, leVels of
regioselectiVity were obserVed to be a function of both the relatiVe
stereochemistry of the homopropargylic alcohol and the absolute
stereochemistry of the aldehyde.13 Whereas high regioselectivity
was observed in most cases, highest levels of regioselection for
coupling of each homopropargylic alcohol were observed in the
formation of coupled products bearing a 1,5-anti stereochemical
relationship between the allylic and homoallylic methyl substituents
(entries 1, 3, 5, and 7). Finally, to probe the significance of the
homopropropargylic alkoxide in these regioselective coupling
reactions we examined the union of the methyl ether 27 with
aldehyde 18 (entry 9). Similarly, high regioselectivity was observed
in this case, thereby indicating that the presence of a neighboring
alkoxide is not required for high levels of regioselection.14,15
Overall, we have defined a two-step procedure that enables
convergent assembly of 1,5-diols and extends the utility of
JA050039+
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 11, 2005 3695