C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 4. Oxacyclizations of Disubstituted Epoxide Substratesa
of polyepoxides. We note the reaction yields for oxacyclization of
substrates 21 and 22, 20% and 25% respectively, are similar to
that of the geranylgeraniol-derived tetraepoxide substrate previously
reported (27% yield3b). We have further demonstrated the utility
of 2,3-epoxysilanes (8, 11, 12) to serve as a regioselectivity-
directing surrogate in this tandem oxacyclization reaction, which
can be efficiently removed. These findings greatly expand the scope
of biomimetic oxacyclization methodology so that naturally oc-
curring, non-terpene-derived polycyclic ethers can now be ef-
ficiently prepared by our approach.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the National
Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE-9982400). We also acknowl-
edge the use of shared instrumentation (NMR spectroscopy, X-ray
diffractometry, polarimetry) provided by grants from the National
Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the Georgia
Research Alliance, and the University Research Committee of
Emory University. We thank Dr. Shaoxiong Wu of the Emory
University NMR facility for his assistance with NOESY spectros-
copy experiments. J.C.V. also acknowledges a GAANN fellowship
(2000-2002) and ARCS Foundation fellowship (2004-2005).
a Conditions: (a) BF3-OEt2, CH2Cl2, -40 °C. (b) Ac2O, pyridine.
tion of substrates 21 and 2210 bearing two “internal” disubstituted
epoxides also resulted in the formation of trans,syn,trans-fused
tetracyclic product 23.12
The general endo-regioselectivity of substrates 18, 19, 21, and
22 is consistent with the idea of nucleophile-driven regiochemical
control (Figure 2)3 where the nature of the nucleophile (i.e., epoxide
vs carbonyl) drives the regioselectivity of oxacyclization with
disubstituted epoxide electrophiles. In the case of the 2,3-epoxide
nucleophile addition to either C6 or C7 of epoxonium ion 24, endo-
cyclization is observed due to formation of fused bicyclo[4.1.0]
intermediate 25 rather than bicyclo[3.1.0] 26 which would have
arisen from exo addition. We speculate that 25 is favored due to
minimization of ring strain in formation of [4.1.0] epoxonium ion
25 relative to 26.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic data for the preparation of all polyepoxide substrates and
their cyclization products; thermal ellipsoid figures and essential data
for crystal structures of a derivative of compound 9, and compound
20. X-ray crystallographic data in CIF format. This material is available
References
(1) Marine Toxins: Origin, Structure and Molecular Pharmacology; Hall, S.,
Strichartz, G., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 418; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1990.
(2) (a) Inoue, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1811. (b) Marmsa¨ter, F. P.;
West, F. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4347. (c) Evans, P. A.; Delouvrie´, B.
Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery 2002, 5, 986.
(3) (a) McDonald, F. E.; Wang, X.; Do, B.; Hardcastle, K. I. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 2917. (b) McDonald, F. E.; Bravo, F.; Wang, X.; Wei, X.; Toganoh,
M.; Rodriguez, J. R.; Do, B.; Neiwert, W. A.; Hardcastle, K. I. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 2515. (c) Bravo, F.; McDonald, F. E.; Neiwert, W. A.;
Hardcastle, K. I. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4487.
(4) (a) Bravo, F.; McDonald, F. E.; Neiwert, W. A.; Do, B.; Hardcastle, K.
I. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2123. For other tandem cyclization syntheses of
fused polycyclic ethers, see: (b) Tokiwano, T.; Fujiwara, K.; Murai, A.
Synlett 2000, 335. (c) Fujiwara, K.; Hayashi, N.; Tokiwano, T.; Murai,
A. Heterocycles 1999, 50, 561. (d) Zakarian, A.; Batch, A.; Holton, R.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7822.
(5) (a) Janda, K. D.; Shevlin, C. G.; Lerner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 2659. (b) Coxon, J. M.; Thorpe, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
10955 and references therein.
Figure 2. Rationale for regioselectivity directed by epoxide nucleophile.
With carbonyl nucleophiles (i.e., tert-butyl carbonate and N,N-
dimethylcarbamate) there is little ring strain associated with either
intermediate 29 or 30,3a,b and the kinetically anticipated exo product
arising from 28 (H at C-3) predominates in substrates with 2,3-
disubstituted epoxide electrophiles. To achieve the endo-oxa-
cyclization to 29 via 27 in the terminal cyclization, either an alkyl
substituent (R′ ) Me) or removable surrogate such as R′ ) SiMe3
is essential (Figure 3).
(6) See Supporting Information for experimental details.
(7) Lead reference for construction of polyene: (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Bulow,
G.; Fernandez-Lazaro, F.; Kim, S.-K.; Lowe, R.; Mollard, P.; Stevens,
K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11664. (b) For regio- and
stereoselective introduction of silicon, see: Kim, K. D.; Magriotis, P. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6137. Lead references for asymmetric
epoxidations: (c) Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder J. M.; Ko, S. Y.;
Masamune, H.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765. (d)
Wang, Z.; Tu, Y.; Frohn, M.; Zhang, J.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 11224.
In conclusion, we have discovered that “internal” disubstituted
epoxides are viable substrates in Lewis acid-initiated oxacyclization
(8) (a) For an excellent review of R,â-epoxysilane chemistry: Hudrlik, P.
F.; Hudrlik, A. M. R,â-Epoxysilanes. In AdVances in Silicon Chemistry;
Larson, G. L., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1993; Vol. 2, pp 1-89.
For conceptually similar oxacyclizations of R,â-epoxysilanes: (b) Adiwid-
jaja, G.; Flo¨rke, H.; Kirschning, A.; Schaumann, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 8771. (c) Heffron, T. P.; Jamison, T. F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2339.
(9) Compound 9 also undergoes efficient protiodesilylation (Supporting
Information). Careful studies of the protiodesilylation of 9 and 13 reveal
that carbonate opening precedes protiodesilylation. The liberated primary
alcohol then assists in protiodesilylation via Brook-type silicon migration.
(10) The polyalkene precursors were generated by iterative ortho ester Claisen
rearrangement: Johnson, W. S.; Werthemann, L.; Bartlett, W. R.;
Brocksom, T. J.; Li, T.; Faulkner, D. J.; Petersen, M. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1970, 92, 741.
(11) The structure of compound 20 was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
analysis.
(12) The structure of compound 23 was confirmed by NOESY spectroscopy.
Figure 3. Rationale for regioselectivity in terminal cyclization step.
JA050013I
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 13, 2005 4587