H.-Y. Jang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 2433–2436
2435
(sample/CHCl3), close to the calculated one (4415.4) for
3.
The energy-minimized structure10 of 3 presents three
topologically discrete subcavities11 resulting from zig-
zag folding. Each of them contains four conversing
NH groups capable of forming hydrogen bonds with
an appropriate dicarbonyl guest such as N,N,N0,N0-
tetramethylterephthalamide (G). The binding property
of 3 with G was first revealed with ESI-mass spectrom-
etry. The mass spectrum was taken with a mixture of 3
and excess G (ꢁ10 equiv) in 50% CH3CN/CHCl3 and
gave a characteristic, intense peak at m/z 1542 which is
attributed to the fragment [3ÆG3-3CF3SO3]3+ of the 1:3
complex. In addition, the fragments corresponding to
the 1:2 complex 3ÆG2 and the 1:1 complex 3ÆG1 are also
seen with reasonably strong intensities as summarized in
Table 1. This result implies that metallocycle 3 can bind
three molecules of the guest G in the gas phase. It should
be noted that the observed isotopic distributions for all
the fragments shown in Table 1, regardless of stoichio-
metries of the complexes, are in accordance with the theo-
retical ones calculated on the basis of metallocycle 3.
(see Supplementary Material).
Figure 1. 1H NMR titration curves plotting NH chemical shift changes
of 3 by increasing [G] and Jobplot (inset) showing the maximum
complexation at ꢁ0.34 mol fraction of 3.
hand, the chemical shift changes of the inner cavity
NHc are too small (Dd = 0.15 ppm) to determine reliably
the association constant (Ka < 20 Mꢀ1).
In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that the self-
assembly based on coordination bonds is highly efficient
for the preparation of a giant metallocycle with multiple
polar binding sites. The binding studies have proved
that the metallocycle binds up to three molecule of a di-
amide guest, one to each cavity, by hydrogen-bonding
interactions.
The binding properties in solution between 3 and G were
investigated in the 1H NMR spectroscopy. In metallocy-
cle 3, two cavities at both ends are identical but one in
the middle is different. As a result, 3 shows three differ-
ent 1H NMR signals for amide protons, NHa, NHb and
NHc. Addition of G to a CDCl3 solution of 3 induced all
three NH signals downfield shifted, but magnitudes of
the chemical shift changes were different. For example,
when G (5 mM) was added in a small portion to a solu-
tion of 3 (0.5 mM) at 25 °C, the NHa and NHb signals in
the outer cavities were gradually shifted from 9.00 and
8.73 ppm to 10.32 and 10.18 ppm, respectively (see
Fig. 1). Under the same conditions, the chemical shift
change in the inner cavity NHc was much smaller, from
8.88 to 9.03 ppm, implying that G binds much more
weakly to the inner cavity than to the outer cavities.
The reduced binding affinity of the inner cavity may
be attributed to two factors, steric effects and hydrogen
donor ability. That is, the inner cavity is surrounded by
four bulky isopropyl groups and thus sterically more
hindered, compared to the outer cavities bearing two
methyl and two isopropyl substituents. Furthermore,
the transition metal coordination on the terminal pyri-
dines increases the hydrogen donor ability of the amide
NHa protons in the outer cavities.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Korea Insti-
tute of the Center for Bioactive Molecular Hybrids
(CBMH) and Science & Technology Evaluation and
Planning (M10213030001- 02B1503-00310).
Supplementary data
Synthesis, binding studies, VPO and ESI-mass experi-
ments of metallocycle 3. Supplementary data associated
with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
1. For reviews, see: (a) Leininger, S.; Olenyuk, B.; Stang, P.
J. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 853–908; (b) Fujita, M.;
Umemoto, K.; Yoshizawa, M.; Fujita, N.; Kusukawa,
T.; Biradha, K. Chem. Commun. 2001, 509–518; (c) Sun,
S.-S.; Lees, A. J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 230, 171–192;
(d) Swiegers, G. F.; Malefetse, T. J. Coord. Chem. Rev.
2002, 225, 91–121.
The association constants for two outer cavities were
determined by nonlinear curve fitting methods using
the HOSTEST program developed by Wilcox,12 and
were found to be 2300 300 and 1200 200 Mꢀ1 for
K1 (=[3ÆG1]/[3][G]) and K2 (=[3ÆG2]/[3ÆG1][G]), respec-
tively. Considering the relationship of K2 = 1/4K1 for
non-cooperative binding, these values reflect slightly po-
sitive cooperativity, which was confirmed by the Hill
coefficient h = 1.3.13 In addition, Jobꢀs plots13 also sup-
port a 1:2 (3/G) binding mode, showing the highest con-
centration of the complex at approximately 0.33 mol
fraction of 3 in CDCl3 (see Fig. 1, inset). On the other
2. For a review, see: Wurthner, F.; You, C.-C.; Saha-Mo¨ller,
¨
C. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 133–146.
3. (a) Jeong, K.-S.; Cho, Y. L.; Song, J. U.; Chang, H.-Y.;
Choi, M.-G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10982–10983;
(b) Jeong, K.-S.; Cho, Y. L.; Chang, S.-Y.; Park, T.-Y.;
Song, J. U. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9459–9466.
4. (a) Chang, S.-Y.; Um, M.-C.; Uh, H.; Jang, H.-Y.; Jeong,
K.-S. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2026–2027; (b) Chang, S.-Y.;
Jang, H.-Y.; Jeong, K.-S. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4358–
4366.