resolution12 by using Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation13 to
furnish a mixture of epoxy alcohol 17 and the remaining
allylic alcohol (S)-16. The ee of (S)-16, obtained in 43%
yield based on rac-16 after chromatography, was >99% by
1H NMR spectroscopy of the derived MTPA ester. Bromi-
nation of (S)-16 with Br2 at -78 °C took place without
injuring the TBDPS group, and subsequent treatment of the
bromine adduct with Bu4NF at -78 °C afforded cis bromide
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Known Intermediate 19
1
8 with complete stereoselection as judged by H NMR and
13C NMR spectroscopy.
Nickel-catalyzed coupling of 6 and 8 (Scheme 2) was
executed by addition of MeLi (1.1 equiv) to a mixture of
boronate ester 6 (1 equiv) and NiCl2(dppf) (0.067 equiv) in
THF followed by reaction with cis bromide 8 (0.67 equiv)
at room temperature for 14 h to furnish dienyl alcohol 2 in
76% yield based on 8. Noteworthy here is that the hydroxyl
group present in 8 did not quench the anionic borate 7, and
thus the molar ratio of the boronate ester 6 could be reduced
to less than 2 equiv of the bromide 8.
Epoxidation of dienyl alcohol 2, the first step of the key
transformation (Scheme 1), proceeded with m-CPBA (1.3
equiv) in a completely stereoselective manner, and subse-
quent palladium-catalyzed reaction of epoxide 3 with AcOH
(2 equiv) furnished 4 in 68% yield from 2. Neither the
regioisomer nor the C(7) diastereomer (structure not shown)
was detected by NMR spectroscopy and TLC analysis. The
two chiral centers, thus created, should have the configura-
tions depicted in 4 on the basis of the literature precedents
for the respective steps.14,15 This speculation was later
confirmed to be correct by transformation to the known
compounds (see the next paragraph).
In the previous synthesis,2 macrolactonization of seco acid
5a was achieved by using the Corey-Nicolaou reagent
((2-PyS)2, PPh3, AgClO4) to produce lactone 20 in 33% yield,
whereas the Keck reagent (DCC, DMAP, H+) and the
Yamaguchi reagent (Cl3C6H2COCl, DMAP) did not afford
the lactone (Scheme 6). To improve the yield, lactonization
Scheme 6. Macrolactonization of Acetonide Seco Acid 5a
The remaining tasks toward completion of the synthesis
were functional group manipulation and macrolactonization.
First, 4 was converted into the Andrus acetonide 192 by a
sequence of reactions depicted in Scheme 5 in good overall
1
yield. The H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of synthetic 19
were all consistent with the data reported.2 A formal synthesis
of decarestrictine D (1) was thus achieved. In addition, the
chiral centers at C(4) and C(7) of 4 constructed by the key
transformation were thus established.
of the same seco acid 5a, derived from the above aldehyde
19 by the literature procedure (NaClO2 then DDQ), was
studied with the Yamaguchi reagent,16 since we were familiar
with this reagent through the syntheses of other macrolides.17
Under slightly modified conditions, the cyclization was
accomplished but furnished 20 only in 17% yield. One reason
we speculated for the failure reported by Andrus (0%) and
the low yield described above (17%) is that the two reac-
tion sites (CO2H and OH) are projected into opposite direc-
tions of the acetonide plane, thus rendering the unfavorable
10-membered lactonization18 even more difficult.
(10) Paquette, L. A.; Barriault, L.; Pissarnitski, D.; Johnston, J. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 619-631.
(11) Kamabuchi, A.; Moriya, T.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Synth.
Commun. 1993, 23, 2851-2859.
(12) Kinetic resolution of γ-silylallylic alcohols: Kitano, Y.; Matsumoto,
T.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 4073-4086.
(13) (a) Martin, V. S.; Woodard, S. S.; Katsuki, T.; Yamada, Y.; Ikeda,
M.; Sharpless, K. B.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6237-6240. (b) Gao,
Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.; Sharpless,
K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765-5780.
(14) Epoxidation of cis allylic alcohols: (a) Rossiter, B. E.; Verhoeven,
T. R.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 4733-4736. (b) Narula, A.
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2017-2020. (c) Tomioka, H.; Suzuki, T.;
Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3387-3390. (d) Adam,
W.; Kumar, R.; Reddy, T. I.; Renz, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996,
35, 880-882.
(15) (a) Trost, B. M.; Molander, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
5969-5972. (b) Tsuji, J.; Kataoka, H.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 2575-2578. (c) Deardorff, D. R.; Myles, D. C.; MacFerrin, K.
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5615-5618. (d) Deardorff, D. R.; Sham-
bayati, S.; Linde II, R. G.; Dunn, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 189-
191. (e) Echavarren, A. M.; Tueting, D. R.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 4039-4041. (f) White, J. D.; Jensen, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 6224-6233.
(16) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989-1993.
(17) (a) Kobayashi, Y.; Nakano, M.; Kumar, G. B.; Kishihara, K. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 7505-7515. (b) Kobayashi, Y.; Okui, H. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 612-615. (c) Kobayashi, Y.; Matsuumi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 7221-7224. (d) Kobayashi, Y.; Kumar, G. B.; Kurachi, T.; Acharya,
H. P.; Yamazaki, T.; Kitazume, T. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2011-2018.
(e) Kobayashi, Y.; Wang, Y.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4381-4384.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 8, 2005
1535