optimal protecting groups for the synthesis of epoxides cis-2
or trans-2.
(and should be avoided in synthesis), and of the sulfon-
amides investigated, a p-NO2C6H4SO2 gave the highest cis
selectivity (Table 1, entry 4). The best compromise of high
cis-selectivity and ease of protecting group introduction/
removal involved the use of either a p-NO2C6H4SO2 or
trichloroactamide N-protecting group for the epoxidation of
cyclohexene-derived allylic amines.
Initially, a wide range of mono-N-protected cyclic allylic
amines 3a-j were prepared using standard methods. The
key synthetic intermediates were trichloroacetamide 3h
(prepared by Overman rearrangement6) and 2-cyclohexen-
1-ylamine (formed by hydrolysis7 of 3h and isolated as the
hydrochloride salt8). N-Protection of 2-cyclohexen-1-ylamine
gave sulfonamides 3a-d, carbamates 3e-g, and amides 3i,j
(see the Supporting Information). The epoxidation of alkenes
3a-j was carried out under standard conditions (0.5 mmol
scale): 2 equiv of m-CPBA/NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, rt, 19 h
followed by workup with aq Na2SO3 (Table 1). In each case,
Next, we prepared five di-N-protected cyclic allylic amines
5a-e. Alkenes 5a, 5b, and 5e were prepared by protection
of N-(cyclohex-2-enyl)-4-methoxybenzylamine,9 whereas a
Mitsunobu approach was used for the synthesis of alkenes
5c and 5d (see the Supporting Information).10 The epoxida-
tion results with 5a-e are shown in Table 2. With di-N-
protected allylic amines, trans-epoxides were obtained as the
major products and this was established as follows. Reaction
of the 90:10 mixture of epoxides cis- and trans-4b (of known
relative stereochemistry5) with p-methoxybenzyl chloride
(K2CO3, MeCN, reflux) gave a major product which, by
Table 1. Stereoselective Epoxidation of Mono-N-protected
Alkenes 3a-j
1
comparison of H NMR spectra, was clearly the minor
product (epoxide cis-6a) from the epoxidation of alkene 5a.
Epoxide 6b was assigned in the same way. In addition,
separate Boc-protection of the 90:10 mixtures of cis- and
trans-4b and -4c identified trans-6c and -6d, respectively.
Proof of stereochemistry in epoxides trans-6c-e was pro-
vided by their rearrangement to oxazolidinones 7a-c (via
participation of the Boc carbonyl group and subsequent loss
of the tert-butyl group3e,4) under acidic conditions (e.g., silica
gel/MeOH, TFA/CH2Cl2) or even under the epoxidation
conditions for trans-6c or trans-6e (Scheme 2). Indeed, a
reduced epoxidation time for alkene 5c was required to
prevent any rearrangement occurring during the reaction. In
contrast, we could not stop rearrangement with epoxide trans-
6e, and oxazolidinone 7c was isolated as the only product
(93% yield) after chromatography.
entry
R
alkene
epoxidea
cis/transb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ms
Ts
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
90:10
90:10
90:10
>95:5
90:10
90:10
85:15
95:5
o-Nsc
p-Nsd
CO2Me
CO2Bn
t
CO2 Bu
Cl3CC(O)
PhC(O)
tBuC(O)
>98:2
>98:2
10
3j
4j
a Epoxidation conditions: m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, rt, 19 h. b Ratio
determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy on the crude product mixture.
c o-NO2C6H4SO2-. d p-NO2C6H4SO2-.
Scheme 2
quantitative crude yields of mixtures of epoxides cis- and
trans-4a-j were obtained, and the ratio of epoxides was
determined from the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude product
mixture. The major products were identified as epoxides cis-
4a-j by analogy with the known stereochemistry of cis-
4b,5 cis-4f,3d and cis-4i.3e
All these epoxidations were cis selective but our results
show that amides are the best cis directors for the m-CPBA-
mediated epoxidation of mono-N-protected cyclohexene-
derived allylic amines (Table 1, entries 8-10). Notably, a
Boc group gave the worst cis selectivity (Table 1, entry 7)
The results in Table 2 indicate that very high levels of
trans stereoselectivity are obtained from the epoxidation of
di-N-protected cyclic allylic amines containing a Boc group
and either a sulfonamide or p-methoxybenzyl group (Table
2, entries 3-5). The stereoselectivity is governed by steric
factors. If the epoxide product is required from N-Boc-
protected allylic amines 5c-e, the reaction time of the
(4) For a systematic study of N-protecting group in some acyclic allylic
amines, see: Roush, W. R.; Straub, J. A.; Brown, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 5127.
(5) Ba¨ckvall, J.-E.; Oshima, K.; Palermo, R. E.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org.
Chem. 1979, 44, 1953.
(6) (a) Overman, L. E.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2901. (b) Nishikawa,
T.; Asai, M.; Ohyabu, N.; Isobe, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 188.
(7) Demay, S.; Kotschy, A. Knochel, P. Synthesis 2001, 863.
(8) (a) Tsushima, S.; Yamada, Y. Onami, T.; Oshima, K.; Chaney, M.
O.; Jones, N. D.; Swartzendruben, J. K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 1989, 62,
1167. (b) Murahashi, S.-I.; Taniguchi, Y.; Imada, Y.; Tanigawa, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 3292.
(9) Ikeda, M.; Hamada, M.; Yamashita, T.; Matsui, K.; Sato, T.; Ishibashi,
H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1949.
(10) (a) Henry, J. R.; Marcin, L. R.; McIntosh, M. C.; Scola, P. M.;
Harris, G. D.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5709. (b)
Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.-K.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6373.
4956
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 26, 2003