chromatography and could be stored at -20 °C for several
months without any sign of isomerization to 10 ob-
served.
The Diels-Alder reaction of enedione 4 with 1-(tert-
butyldimethylsiloxy)-1,3-butadiene (3) was examined using
several different solvent and temperature conditions. Optimal
conditions reacted enedione 4 with 1.5 equiv of diene 3 in
dichloromethane at 40 °C for 3 days to afford a single (>95:
5) crystalline (mp 185-187°) cycloadduct in 60-68% yield.
The stereochemistry of this adduct was unambiguously
assigned by single-crystal X-ray analysis and much to our
surprise proved to be the unanticipated diastereomer 6
(Scheme 2). It was later determined that microwave irradia-
Figure 2. Stereochemical analysis of Diels-Alder reaction between
3 and 4.
Scheme 1
cycloaddition between 3 and 4 may proceed by way of four
different transition state structures, two endo and two exo
structures. Initially, we considered only the endo approach
to be viable, and our rationale leading to the prediction that
diastereomer 2 would be the major reaction product was as
follows. First, on the basis of considerations of frontier
molecular orbitals, we anticipated that the transition-state
structure leading to the cycloaddition product would be
asynchronous with bond a further developed relative to bond
b (cf. 5).6 Next, we anticipated, on the basis of stereoelec-
tronic considerations, that the first formed bond (bond a)
would favor a pseudoaxial approach, leading us to predict
formation of the desired cycloadduct (2) instead of the
diastereomeric product 6.7 A second major concern was the
questionable stability of diketone 4 since tautomerization
could readily lead to the corresponding, thermodynamically
more stable dihydroquinone.8
tion (100 W) of a neat mixture of enedione 4 and siloxydiene
3 (4 equiv) heated to 70 °C reduced the reaction time to 10
h and increased the chemical yield to 84%.12
Following the procedure of Fu¨rstner and co-workers, we
converted dimethyl tartrate (-)-7 to diol 8 starting with a
one-pot reduction/vinyl Grignard addition to afford diol 8
in 77% yield.9 As reported earlier, diol 8 underwent a ring-
closing metathesis reaction mediated by Grubbs second-
generation catalyst to afford cyclohexene 9 in 90-95% yield.
Next, we examined the oxidation of 9 to enedione 4 under
Swern oxidation conditions.10 In this case, we were disap-
pointed to observe exclusive production of hydroquinone 10
(45% yield). Fortunately, oxidation of 9 with Dess-Martin
periodinane proceeded smoothly to give enedione 4 in 84%
yield.11 Enedione 4 proved to be stable to silica gel
Scheme 2
The [4 + 2] cycloaddition of diene 3 and dienophile 4
proceeded with anticipated endo selectivity; however, the
observed facial selectivity was the reverse of that anticipated
on the basis of our earlier discussion of stereoelectronic
control (Figure 2) and required for the synthesis of the AB/
GH ring system of the hibarimicins. We therefore elected to
examine alternate diol protecting groups in hope of altering
the course of the facial selectivity of the Diels-Alder
reaction. Toward this end, we prepared dienophiles 11 and
14,13 where the diol was protected as a bis-TBS ether and
(4) Trost, B. M.; Chupak, L. S.; Lubbers, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
736-736.
(5) For an earlier approach to this ring system, see: Kim, K.; Maharoof,
U. S. M.; Raushel, J.; Sulikowski, G. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2777-2780.
(6) Dewar, M. J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 209-215.
(7) (a) Capaccio, C. A. I.; Varela, O. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7839-
7846. (b) Primeau, J. L.; Anderson, R. C.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 5874-5879.
(8) Guo, Z. X., Haines, A. H.; Pyke, S. M.; Pyke, S. G.; Taylor, R. J. K
Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 264, 147-153.
(9) (a) Ackermann, L.; El Tom, D.; Fu¨rstner, A. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
2195-2202. (b) Conrad, R. M.; Grogan, M. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 1359-1361.
(10) Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1981, 165-185.
(11) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4156.
(b) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-7287.
(12) Kappe, C. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250-6284.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 9, 2005
1688